100 likes | 288 Views
EPNoSL Period 3 Kick Off Meeting Management and Administrative Issues (9:00-9:45, 27.03.2014 ). Brussels, Belgium - March 26-27, 2013 By Kathy Kikis-Papadakis kathy@schoolleadersip.eu. A. Management Groups. PMC
E N D
EPNoSL Period 3 Kick Off MeetingManagement and Administrative Issues (9:00-9:45, 27.03.2014) Brussels, Belgium - March 26-27, 2013 By Kathy Kikis-Papadakis kathy@schoolleadersip.eu
A. Management Groups • PMC • Members: FORTH (P1), NQL Hildesheim(P4), TPF (P10), ESHA (P24), ULHT (P26), IBE (P35) and NEC (P36) • Advisory Board • Members: GTC Scotland – Coordinator (P14), EFEE (P15), ETUCE (P25), OND Vlaanderen (P29), MEC PT (P31), EPA (P30) and MIUR (P42) • Scientific Advisory Group • Members: Michael Schratz (P8), Olof Johansson (P11), Lejf Moos (P16), Philip Woods (P22) and representative of the Slovenian Ministry of Education, Science and Sport
B. Management Guide (internal space) • Upgraded version by May 11th, 2014 • Financial Reporting (reference to an contractual obligations) • Partnership Agreements • Obligations of the Coordinator and of the Partners (Financial Reporting) • Evaluation Requirements • Work Plan Execution • Reporting • Interim: 13/6/2014 (to be submitted 11/7/2014) • Final: 17/07/2015 (workplan related) and 24/07/2015 (Financial statement and reporting) – to be submitted 11/8/2015
C. Financial Reporting • 24/7/2015 by partners • as per requirements already communicated
D. Partnership Agreements(as per list PA) • We have approx. 50% • Kathy returns these to partners
E. Roles of partners and coordinator E1. The role of the partners • Summary of tasks and budget info (handout) • CD: Containing info on Project related issues, Contract related materials and Second Period’s Outputs (all alike, Kathy hand out to partners) E2. Coordinator’s Role • As per WP1 and Contractual Obligations
F. Evaluation Requirements(see Reflection tool #A7 of CD) • Internal Project Evaluation • Impact Evaluation (Gerry works with Advisory Group) • Coherence between the State of the Art and the EPNoSL approach (Jacky works with Scientific Group)
G. Reporting • All dels and other contents to FORTH. Evaluation Group Assesses before submission
H.EPNoSL Response to EC questions(Feb 19th meeting related) • Reflections on EC’s clarification requirements on EPNoSL 2014 Work Programme\ • Q.A. (to include RISK ASSESSMENT) • How do we enlarge the Network (geographical + profiles of stakeholders + how they get involved) • Meaning of toolbox (WP2) • Testing of resources / tools (how and why) • Profiles of webinars participants (representatives of institutions?) (WP3) • Planning of Networking events (Number / country / profiles) • Meaning of structuring and culturing (WP4) • Elaboration on Action Plans (Regional Learning Traditions vs Generic Action Plans) (WP4) • How will the Ministries involvement be secured(WP5) • How is the PMC organized (Ministries involvement) • Sustainability EC, National, and other levels
I.Evaluation Concerns and Proposals The floor to Jacky and Gerry