150 likes | 236 Views
One more look into ERL-ring LHeC Vladimir N. Litvinenko, Frank Zimmermann , Rogelio Tomas. Key ingredients: CW ERL low β * ~ 10 cm c rossing angle to avoid synchrotron radiation in the detector using low electron beam current and coherent electron cooling
E N D
One more look into ERL-ring LHeCVladimir N. Litvinenko, Frank Zimmermann, Rogelio Tomas Key ingredients: • CW ERL • low β* ~ 10 cm • crossing angle to avoid synchrotron radiation in the detector • using low electron beam current and coherent electron cooling • power consumption < 100 MW • Luminosity > 1E34 cm-2sec-1
Selecting key parametersfor 60 GeV ERL BNL type 700 MHz cavity He 2K refrigerator: ~700 W at RT per 1 Watt at 2K
Coherent-electron-Cooling would provide following for linac-ring LHeC • Smaller proton beam emittance down to 0.2 mm mrad • Can provide shorted bunches down to 1 cm (if needed) • Allows to reduce electron beam current 20-fold to achieve of e-p luminosity above 1034 level with 60 GeV electrons and 7 TeV protons
Layout for ERL based LHC 10 GeV linac • Energy of the ERL - 60 GeV • Polarized electron beam current - 8 mA • Number of passes – 3 • AC power consumption – 100 MW R=700m R=700m 10 GeV linac Dump Gun 0.5 GeV ERL-injector
Sample of CeC for LHeC We are using here conservative 0.8 hrs cooling time
V.N. Litvinenko, ABP Forum, CERN, April 9, 2010 Evolution of beam in LHC at 7 TeV with IBS and CeC (assuming nominal LHC bunch intensity 1.15e11 p/bunch and 40% of CeC cooling capability) J.LeDuff, "Single and Multiple Touschek effects", Proceedings of CERN Accelerator School, Rhodes, Greece, 20 September - 1 October, 1993, Editor: S.Turner, CERN 95-06, 22 November 1995, Vol. II, p. 573 IBS rates in LHC from Table 2.2 Stationary solution for τCeC= 0.8 hrs