Impact of Recent Fair Value Accounting Rules on Governmental Pension Plans

1. Impact of Recent Fair Value Accounting Rules on Governmental Pension Plans Presented by Tom Heseltine, Partner

2. Course Objective • Discuss recent accounting guidance and their impact on alternative investments • Discuss how current economic conditions are impacting valuation of alternative investments and potentially the financial reporting of your System • Your responsibility in evaluating the valuation internal controls and processes of your alternative investments

3. Fair value is the price that would be received or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Fair Value Definition

4. Why Fair Value? Limited Partners in alternative investment funds need consistent, transparent information to exercise their fiduciary duty. Fair value provides such information. An arbitrary reporting basis such as cost does not allow apple to apple comparisons.

5. The Fair Value Objective The FASB believes that, in order to be useful, accounting information should be both relevant and reliable Relevance Reliability Fair Value Historical Cost

6. Alternative Investments Valuation Obstacles • Valuing alternative investments is difficult because these investments are not publicly traded. • Performance is derived from estimates of market prices, instead of true market price data. • Estimates are created from various approaches such as book value, appraisal of the investment etc.

7. FAS 157 • Defines fair value for financial reporting • Establishes a framework to measure fair value under GAAP • Expands disclosures on fair value measurements • Provisions are not applicable for governmental pension systems but has impacted public pension systems

8. The Fair Value Hierarchy • Observable Inputs • Based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity • Unobservable Inputs • Reflect reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use

9. Fair Value Hierarchy – Input Quality • Level 1 • Direct (unadjusted) quoted price form an active market for identical assets • Level 2 • Quoted prices for similar assets • Other observable inputs (interest rates, yield curves, etc.) • Level 3 • Unobservable inputs not derived from the market

10. Common Level 3 Inputs • Cash flow forecasts for private companies • Default probabilities and loss severities for private placement debt or asset-backed securities • Growth expectations (revenue, earnings, etc.) • Required returns on illiquid investments • Anticipated holding periods for illiquid investments

11. What Are Common Level 3 Assets? • Mortgage and asset backed securities • Private placement corporate debt • Equity investments in private companies • Forward contracts, commitments and guarantees • Other derivative contracts

12. Disclosure Requirements For all assets measured under SFAS 157: • The level within the fair value hierarchy in which fair value measurements in their entirety fall • The valuation techniques used to measure fair value

13. Disclosure Requirements (Cont’d) For measurements using significant Level 3 inputs: • Beginning balance • Total gains or losses (both realized and unrealized) • Purchases and sales of assets • Transfers in and/or out of Level 3

14. Active vs. Inactive Markets An active market will generally: • Provide reliable pricing • Provide reasonably narrow observable ranges within bid ask spreads • Be supported by actual market transactions that are typically daily • Be provided by sources actively involved in the relevant market • Enable a participant to corroborate pricing on a historical basis

15. Valuation of Illiquid Alternative Investments • FAS 157 contemplated an orderly transaction between market participants not a distressed market with no or limited activity • FAS 157-e was issued to clarify how a reporting entity determines fair value when the market for financial assets that historically had been active and is now inactive and how to handle value an investment when the last price is not current.

16. Valuation of Illiquid Alternative Investments • FAS 157-e established a two step process: 1) Determine whether a market is inactive by identifying how many transactions have occurred and if few what does that mean, assessing whether price quotes are current or not and determining if quotes vary dramatically from broker to broker and there are abnormally wide bid/ask prices. If these conditions exist then we go to step 2.

17. Valuation of Illiquid Alternative Investments 2) If considered inactive the fund itself is now responsible for pricing that security. This leads to several challenges. • Does the fund have the resources and ability to properly perform this function • Should be considered a higher risk and should be further scrutinized by their auditors and should be a higher risk to your plan

18. Valuation of Alternative Investments Examples of inputs used when estimating fair value include: • Net Asset Value (NAV) • Transactions in principal to principal or brokered markets • Features of the alternative investment • Expected future cash flows appropriately discounted

19. Valuation of Alternative Investments (Cont’d) A reasonable assumption is that the net asset value (NAV) of the fund and the nature and duration of the restrictions on redemption, would be significant inputs to any estimation of fair value.

20. Valuation of Alternative Investments (Cont’d) In situations where there are no recent redemptions it is less clear that NAV is an appropriate measure because no transactions exist to indicate investors willingness to relinquish their investments in the fund.

21. Valuation of Alternative Investments (Cont’d) Historically industry practice generally had been to carry interests at the NAV most recently reported by the investee fund manager with little or no further review of the amounts reported by the investee fund.

22. Valuation of Alternative Investments (Cont’d) Recent guidance clarified this practice and requires the investor entity to undertake a robust review and understand and evaluate the NAV reported by the investee fund manager. The “exit price” concept under FASB 157 further challenges an investor entity’s decision to continue to value such investments at NAV.

23. Valuation of Alternative Investments (Cont’d) Therefore the task of estimating fair value is twofold: • The reporting entity would evaluate whether the reported NAV has been appropriately determined and therefore represents a good starting point in estimating fair value • Then the entity would evaluate all relevant factors and attributes of the interest in the alternative investment and determine whether the reported NAV represents fair value or whether the NAV should be adjusted to fair value.

24. Valuation of Alternative Investments (Cont’d) To assist in assessing the reliability of the NAV reported the investor entity should develop the following controls: • Initial due diligence • Ongoing monitoring procedures • Financial reporting controls

25. Valuation of Alternative Investments (Cont’d) Some factors to consider: • The investee fund’s fair value estimation process and control environment and any changes to those processes or the control environment • The investee fund’s policies and procedures for estimating fair value of the underlying investments and any changes to those policies and procedures

26. Valuation of Alternative Investments (Cont’d) • The use of independent third party valuation experts to argument and validate the investee fund’s procedures for estimating fair value • The portion of the underlying securities held by the investee fund that are traded on active markets • The professional reputation and standing of the investee fund’s auditor • Qualifications if any of the auditor’s report on the investee fund’s financial statements

27. Valuation of Alternative Investments (Cont’d) • Evidence that the reported NAV is based on application of FASB 157 • Whether there is a history of significant adjustments to the NAV reported by the investee fund manager as a result of the annual financial statement audit • Findings in the investee fund’s advisor or administrator’s SAS 70 report if any

28. Valuation of Alternative Investments (Cont’d) Factors to consider when assessing whether NAV should be adjusted: • Significant time has elapsed between the calculation date and the investor’s reporting date. • The investor entity has become aware of changes in the value of the underlying investments since the calculation date of the reported NAV

29. Valuation of Alternative Investments (Cont’d) • Market changes or other economic conditions have changed to favorably or unfavorably affect the value of the investee’s portfolio after the calculation date of the reported NAV • Significant changes have occurred in the composition of the underlying investment portfolio after the calculation date of the reported NAV

30. Valuation of Alternative Investments (Cont’d) • Significant balance sheet items not carried at fair value • Features of the investor entity’s agreement that may affect its fair value but which are not captured in the NAV • Redemption restrictions (lock-up terms, etc) • Early withdrawal fees • Suspended withdrawals • Fund closed to new investors

31. Accounting and Auditing Standards • FASB Statement No. 157 Fair Value Measurements and 157-e Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for that Asset is Not Active • Proposed amendment FAS 157-g Estimating the Fair Value of Investments in Investment Companies • FAS 159 The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

32. Accounting and Auditing Standards • FSP FAS 157-4 Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That are Nor Orderly • AICPA Industry Audit and Accounting Guides including “Auditing Investments in Securities Where a Readily Determinable Fair Value Does Not Exist”

33. Additional Implementation Guidance and Other Resources • AICPA Alternative Investments – Audit Considerations • SEC Sample Letter Sent to Public Companies on MD&A Disclosure Regarding the Application of SFAS 157 • AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide – Investment Companies http://www.aicpa.org/download/members/div/auditstd/Alternative_Investments_Practice_Aid.pdf • Center For Audit Quality – Measurements of Fair Value in Illiquid (or less liquid) Markets

34. Additional Implementation Guidance and Other Resources • PCAOB • FASB, ISB • National Council of Real Estate Investment Fiduciaries (NCREIF) Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Implementation Guidance for Real Estate Investments • Private Equity Industry Guidelines Group (PEIGG) and Updated US Private Equity Valuation Guidelines • Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS) • Alternative Investment Management Association Guide to Sound Practices for Hedge Fund Valuation

35. Impact of Current Economic Conditions • Audits related to valuation of alternative investments for the period 12/31/08 were the most difficult in recent history and resulted in significant adjustments • Valuation for the period ending 12/31/09 will continue to difficult due to the continuing struggle of the current economy and the impact on the underlying investments • Preliminary amounts reported to the Systems for the period ended 12/31/09 may be materially different than the final amounts reported • Use of “quarter” or “6 month lags” in reporting may not be reasonable in today’s environment. • Requires additional oversight by governmental pension systems to verify the reliability of interim and preliminary valuation by the alternative investment manager or general partner

36. Investor Management’s Responsibility for the Valuation Process and Related Internal Control Management is responsible for making the fair value measurements and disclosures included in the financial statements. As part of fulfilling its responsibility, management needs to establish an accounting and financial reporting process for determining the fair value measurements and disclosures, select appropriate valuation methods, identify and adequately support any significant assumptions used, prepare the valuation, and ensure that the presentation and disclosure of the fair value measurements are in accordance with GAAP. AU Section 328.04

37. Management’s Responsibility (Cont’d) At a minimum, management should have sufficient understanding of: • The nature of the underlying investments held by the alternative investment fund; • The portfolio strategy of the alternative investment fund and the method and significant assumptions used by the fund manager to value underlying investments.

38. Internal Control and Monitoring of Alternative Investments • Initial due diligence before investing in the fund. Controls might include face to face meeting with the fund’s management, on-site visits, reference checks and inspection of legal documents. • Ongoing monitoring after investing in the fund. Period meetings with fund management, on-site visits, review of SAS 70 reports (if available), review of fund reports and monitoring of fund performance

39. Internal Control and Monitoring Duties (Cont’d) • Maintenance of an investment policy, formation of investment committee, and review of audited financial statements for alternative investment funds. • Benchmarking results to relevant indexes

40. Internal Control and Monitoring Duties (Cont’d) Use of Investment Consultant – monitors the investments through analyzing investment performance, attending all advisory board meetings, attending annual meetings, ongoing communications with the partnerships and ongoing communications with other limited partners.

41. The Valuation Policy • The valuation policy should be a priority • The policy should be well documented • The valuation process should be open and transparent • The policy is a working document • A sound valuation policy is critical and it pays dividends

42. Best Practices • Recognize that valuation matters (it will really matter when something has gone awry) • Disclose the valuation process and conclusion (potential investors/creditors take comfort in transparency) • Transform “compliance” work into a competitive advantage • Designate a member of senior management to be responsible for oversight of valuation process

43. Best Practices (Cont’d) Document valuation procedures • “If it has not been documented, it has not been done.” Create contemporaneous and consistent documentation of valuation rationale and conclusions • After the fact valuations will invariably be perceived as self-serving whether they are or not

44. REMEMBER THIS… “Fair value is an art, not a science.”

45. Questions?

46. Contact Tom Heseltine, CPA, Partner Clifton Gunderson LLP 9515 Deereco Road, Suite 500 Timonium, Maryland 21093 410-453-0900 Tom.Heseltine@cliftoncpa.com