1 / 32

Evidence based local conditions as key success factors in oral implantology

Evidence based local conditions as key success factors in oral implantology. 3rd Prof. Yalda Congress Tehran - November 2012. EAO Consensus Conference Statement 2009 Local conditions for implant treatment.

Download Presentation

Evidence based local conditions as key success factors in oral implantology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evidence based local conditions as key success factors in oral implantology 3rd Prof. Yalda Congress Tehran - November 2012 www.implant-op.com

  2. EAO Consensus Conference Statement 2009Local conditions for implant treatment • Documentation due to controled oral hygiene, absence of any form of periodontal disease or finished periodontal treatment • Obligation to integrate the patient in a periodontal recall system Bornstein et al 2008, Martin et al 2009, Salvi et al 2009 www.implantat-op.de

  3. EAO Consensus Conference Recommendation 2009Local conditions for implant treatment • Documentation due to abcence of any form of dental cavity • Documentation due to absence of endodontic infections Bornstein et al 2008, Martin et al 2009, Salvi et al 2009 www.implantat-op.de

  4. Consequences of insufficient oral hygiene and periodontitis prior to implant treatment 1. Increasing diversity and concentration of periimplantitis relevant patogens 2. Increasing risk for pimary infections during wound healing phase 3. Increasing risk for long term periimplant infections and implant loss Schwarz et al 2007, Renvert et al 2008, Sanz et al, 2009 Sculean et al 2010 www.implant-op.com

  5. Implantology todaybetween scientific standards and reality www.implantat-op.de

  6. Oral hygiene status, Perio status, Restorative status, Endo status www.implant-op.com

  7. Case report – Preoperative status www.implant-op.com

  8. www.implant-op.com

  9. Clinical Chart www.implant-op.com

  10. Periodontal Chart www.implant-op.com

  11. Radiographic Chart www.implantat-op.de

  12. Situation after oral hygiene, temporary restorative, perio, mucogingival surgery, extractions, sp, micro sinuslift, implants and exposure of implants – 14 months later www.implant-op.com

  13. www.implant-op.com

  14. www.implant-op.com

  15. www.implant-op.com

  16. Clinical situation after prostho – 17 months later www.implant-op.com

  17. www.implant-op.com

  18. www.implant-op.com

  19. www.implant-op.com

  20. www.implant-op.com

  21. Periodontal Chart – 18 months later www.implant-op.com

  22. Case report 2 www.implant-op.com

  23. www.implant-op.com

  24. www.implant-op.com

  25. www.implant-op.com

  26. Complications 1 www.implantat-op.de

  27. Reason for Failur ? Treatment plan ? Conditions ? www.implantat-op.de

  28. Complivations 2 www.implant-op.com

  29. www.implant-op.com

  30. Reason for Failur ? Treatment plan ? Conditions ? www.implant-op.com

  31. Conclusion Professionaloral hygiene and plaque control performed by dental hygienistisone of scientificallyprovedkeyfactors for success in implant treatment Implant patients should be integrated in a perioprosthetic recall system www.implant-op.com

  32. Thank you for your kind attention www.implantat-op.de

More Related