1 / 38

Klausur

Klausur. Wann: Freitag 16. Februar 2007 Start: 10:00 Uhr Dauer: 120 Minuten Ort: Magnushörsaal Ihr braucht: Stift(e), Lichtbildausweis, Studentenausweis!. Semantic Web. Tolle. ?. ?. ?. ?. ?. Die Situation im Internet. Möglichkeiten heutiger Internetsuchmaschinen sind begrenzt.

triage
Download Presentation

Klausur

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Klausur • Wann: Freitag 16. Februar 2007 • Start: 10:00 Uhr • Dauer: 120 Minuten • Ort: Magnushörsaal • Ihr braucht: Stift(e), Lichtbildausweis, Studentenausweis!

  2. Semantic Web

  3. Tolle ? ? ? ? ? Die Situation im Internet • Möglichkeiten heutiger Internetsuchmaschinen sind begrenzt.

  4.  führte bei Google zu mehr als 143.000 Treffern ???? Ende 2005 Die Situation im Internet • Mögliche Suchanfrage:Tolle Universität Jan. 2007: 1.210.000 Treffer

  5. Die Situation im Internet • Keine Vernetzung der Informationen! arbeitet an ist Vater von

  6. predicate subject object Die Situation mit dem Semantischen Web • Vernetzung der Informationen! + arbeitet an URI für „Karsten Tolle“ + ist Vater von

  7. Semantic Web • "The Semantic Web is an extension of the current web in which information is given well-defined meaning, better enabling computers and people to work in cooperation." -- Tim Berners-Lee, James Hendler, Ora Lassila, The Semantic Web, Scientific American, May 2001

  8. Maschinenverständliche Informationen • Nicht durch KI • Möglichkeit: Maschinen sollen fähig sein ein definiertes Problem mit definierten Operationen auf existierenden, definierten Daten zu lösen! • Voraussetzung: von maschinenlesbaren Daten zu maschinenverständlichen Daten • Nutzung von Metadaten (Daten über Daten)

  9. RDF als Grundlage • RDF – Resource Description Framework Framework zur Beschreibung von (Web) Ressourcen, bietet einheitliche Konventionen für: • Syntax • Struktur • Semantik

  10. zeitliche Entwicklung

  11. Repräsentationsformen • Graph – zum Lesen durch den Menschen • Triple – skalierbare Darstellung, einfach zu speichern • RDF/XML – für den Datenaustausch Bemerkung: es gibt eine 1-1 Abbildung zwischen diesen Repräsentationsformen!

  12. Ziele bei der Entwicklung von RDF • Independence (Unabhängigkeit). It should be possible for anyone to define its own schemas and use and/or reuse them in a specific semantic way. • Interchange (Austauschbarkeit). It should be easy to transport and storage the metadata described by RDF. • Scalability (Skalierbarkeit). Even for a huge set of metadata it should be easy to handle and process them.

  13. RDF Datenmodell • RDF Data Model is based on the notions of resource, property, literal and statement • resource  everything is a resource! • property specific characteristics of a resource; properties are resources! • literal constant value represented by character strings • statement a specific resource together with a property and a value (either a resource or a literal), respectively called subject, predicate and object • Bemerkung: Früher waren Literale und Resourcen getrennt!

  14. Grafische Darstellung von RDF-Aussagen

  15. Tripeldarstellung: [ http://www.dbis.cs.uni-frankfurt.de/~tolle/RDF/index.html http://www.my.de/vok#creator „Karsten Tolle“ ] Graf: RDF/XML: <?xml version="1.0"?> <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:my="http://www.myns.de/vok#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.dbis.cs.uni-frankfurt.de/~tolle/RDF/index.html"> <my:creator>Karsten Tolle</my:creator> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

  16. Tripeldarstellung: [ http://www.dbis.cs.uni-frankfurt.de/~tolle/RDF/index.html my:creator _:1 ] [ _:1 rdf:type my:Person ] [ _:1 my:name “Karsten Tolle” ] Graf: RDF/XML: <?xml version="1.0"?> <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:my="http://mytestnamespace#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.dbis.cs.uni-frankfurt.de/~tolle/RDF/index.html"> <my:creator> <my:Person> <my:name>Karsten Tolle</my:name> </my:Person> </my:creator> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

  17. RDF/XML <?xml version="1.0" ?> <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:ex="http://example.org/stuff/1.0/"> <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.dbis.informati.uni-frankfurt.de/~tolle/RDF/index.html"dc:title="Semantic Web and the Resource Description Framework (RDF) at DBIS"> <ex:editor> <rdf:Description ex:fullName="Karsten Tolle"> <ex:homePagerdf:resource="http://www.dbis.informati.uni-frankfurt.de/~tolle/"/> </rdf:Description> </ex:editor> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

  18. Graph RepresentationIsaViz

  19. RDF Schema mechanism • Based on the basic notation of using statements, RDF defines a schema mechanism that introduces the basic constructs that can be used in the definition of RDF schemas (or vocabularies) • An RDF schema can define for a given application or domain • resources • classes • properties along with some constraints • hierarchies for classes and properties • collections or containers • annotations to the defined vocabulary

  20. War in der 1999 Spezifikation anders! Geloescht Geloescht superclass of RDF Schema mechanism (classes) • There are two namespaces defined for RDF that can be viewed as the core vocabulary. We abbreviate them by the prefix: rdf = "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" rdfs = "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"

  21. RDF Schema mechanism (core properties) • rdf:type – instantiates a resource into a class • rdfs:subClassOf – used to define a class hierarchy • rdfs:subPropertyOf – used to define a property hierarchy • rdfs:domain – constraints defines a property to be used with subject-resources of a specified class • rdfs:range – constraints defines a property to be used with object of a specified class • ...

  22. RDF/XML Schema A part of rdfs (http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema): ... <rdf:Property rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type"> <rdfs:isDefinedByrdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" /> <rdfs:label>type</rdfs:label> <rdfs:comment>The subject is an instance of a class.</rdfs:comment> <rdfs:rangerdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#Class" /> <rdfs:domainrdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#Resource" /> </rdf:Property> <rdfs:Class rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#Class"> <rdfs:isDefinedByrdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" /> <rdfs:label>Class</rdfs:label> <rdfs:comment>The class of classes.</rdfs:comment> <rdfs:subClassOfrdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#Resource" /> </rdfs:Class> ...

  23. Reified Statements-Aussagen über Aussagen

  24. Reified Statements Vassilis says: ”Karsten is the creator of the resource http://www.ics.forth.gr/proj/isst/RDF.”

  25. Container Three types: • rdf:Bag – a unordered set {a, b, c, d} • rdf:Seq – an ordered set [a, b, a, c] • rdf:Alt – an alternative (rdf:_1 is default)

  26. Container

  27. Collection

  28. Container vs Collection • With a collection you can ensure (when using correct structure) that all elements are contained. • Containers have a semantic, collections not. Problem: The creator of an RDF file needs to choose between these two constructs.

  29. page Karsten creator RDF vs XML How to represent this information in XML? <document> <uri>page</uri> <creator>Karsten</creator> </document> <creator ID="Karsten"> <document uri="page"/> </creator> <uri ID="page" type="document"> <creator ID="Karsten"/> </uri> <document uri="page" creator="Karsten" />

  30. RDF vs XML <a> <b attr1="344"> <c>ttttttt</c> <d>uuuuu</d> </b> <e attr2="vvvvvvv"/> </a> Without knowing the schema you only have the structure!

  31. RDF vs XML XML Schemas ... Model RDFSchema

  32. RDF vs XML • In XML you have • A many to one mapping. • You need to know the schema. • Limited to a tree. • No inference defined. • No default constructs like in RDF like classes and hierarchies, containers, ...) • ...

  33. RDF Limitations • No equivalence • needed to resolve synonymy • No distinction between schemas and data • anyone can add to schema definitions • Weak schema versioning mechanism • schemas will evolve over time

  34. Extensions for RDF • OWL – Web Ontology Language • OWL lite • OWL DL (description logics) • OWL full • Namespace: xmlns:owl ="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"

  35. OWL Lite (some examples) (In)Equality: • equivalentClass • equivalentProperty • sameAs • differentFrom • allDifferent Property Characteristics: • inverseOf • TransitiveProperty • SymmetricProperty • FunctionalProperty • InverseFunctionalProperty

More Related