410 likes | 548 Views
Two years of solar observation with PROBA2/LYRA: An overview I. E. Dammasch , M. Dominique, M. Kretzschmar (ROB/SIDC),. XII th Hvar Astrophysical Colloquium Hvar, Croatia, 03-07 Sep 2012. Contents. Introduction What is PROBA2 ? What is LYRA ? What data products are delivered ?
E N D
Two years of solar observation with PROBA2/LYRA: An overview I. E. Dammasch, M. Dominique, M. Kretzschmar (ROB/SIDC), XIIth Hvar Astrophysical Colloquium Hvar, Croatia, 03-07 Sep 2012
Contents • Introduction • What is PROBA2 ? • What is LYRA ? • What data products are delivered ? • Results (selected examples) • Quasi-periodic pulsations in flares • Lyman-alpha signatures of flares • Degradation, and what to do about it • Long-term irradiance development • Thermal evolution of flares
PROBA2 • ESA’s “PRoject for On-Board Autonomy” • Belgian microsatellite in Sun-synchronous orbit • 725 km altitude • Launched 02 Nov 2009 • Nominal operations since March 2010 • Technology and science mission • 4 innovative instruments and 17 technological experiments for in-orbit demonstration • Among them the EUV imager SWAP and the radiometer LYRA
LYRA • Large-Yield RAdiometer • 3 instrument units (redundancy) • 4 spectral channels per head • 3 types of detectors, • Silicon + 2 types of • diamond detectors (MSM, PIN): • - radiation resistant • - insensitive to visible light • compared to Si detectors • High cadence up to 100 Hz
LYRA design • Royal Observatory of Belgium (Brussels, B) • Principal Investigator, overall design, onboard software specification, science operations • PMOD/WRC (Davos, CH) • Lead Co-Investigator, overall design and manufacturing • Centre Spatial de Liège (B) • Lead institute, project management, filters • IMOMEC (Hasselt, B) • Diamond detectors • Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung (Lindau, D) • calibration • science Co-Is: BISA (Brussels, B), LPC2E (Orléans, F)…
LYRA filter-detector combinations • Spectral channels covering a wide emission temperature range • Redundancy with different types of detectors • Rad-hard, solar-blind diamond UV sensors (PIN and MSM) • AXUV Si photodiodes • 2 calibration LEDs per detector (λ = 465 nm and 390 nm) • Quasi-continuous acquisition during mission lifetime
SWAP and LYRA spectral intervals for solar flares, space weather, and aeronomy LYRA channel 1: the H I 121.6 nm Lyman-alpha line (120-123 nm) LYRA channel 2: the 200-220 nm Herzberg continuum range (now 190-222 nm) LYRA channel 3: the 17-80 nm Aluminium filter range incl the He II 30.4 nm line (+ <5nm X-ray) LYRA channel 4: the 6-20 nm Zirconium filter range with highest solar variablility (+ <2nm X-ray) SWAP: the range around 17.4 nm including coronal lines like Fe IX and Fe X
LYRA data products • Daily FITS file (uncalibrated, full resolution): “Lev1” • Daily FITS file (calibrated, full resolution): “Lev2” • Daily FITS file (calibrated, 1-minute averages): “Lev3” • Daily overview graphic • Daily flare list • Daily GOES proxy • 3-day overview graphic • Monthly overview graphic • SSA service (“Space Situational Awareness”, with SWAP) • … all updated several times per day, after downlink http://proba2.sidc.be
LYRA data products: Flare list LYRA data products: Flare List
Example X2.2 flare 15 Feb 2011 01:56 UTC
Results (1) L. Dolla et al.: “Time delays in quasi-periodic pulsations observed during the X2.2 solar flare on 2011 February 15” Astrophysical Journal Letters 749:L16 (2012) • QPP observed simultaneously in several wavebands • Focus on fluctuations on timescale 1-30 s • Different time lags between different wavebands • During impulsive phase approx 9 s between first and last (RHESSI, Nobeyama, SDO/ESP, LYRA, GOES) • Possible emission mechanisms discussed
Results (2) M. Kretzschmar et al.: “Sun-as-a-star observation of flares in Lyman-alpha by the PROBA2/LYRA radiometer” Solar Physics (subm.) • Flare signatures in H I 121.5nm • 9 in early phase (before degradation), 2 later (spare unit campaign) • Flux increases approx 0.6% • Profile peak compared in different wavelengths (PROBA2, GOES, SOHO/SEM, Suzaku, Kanzelhoehe, GONG)
LYRA degradation Temporal response loss of (nominal) unit 2, and estimation of future trends
Results (3) A. BenMoussa et al.: “Lessons learned from on-orbit degradation of solar instruments” (in prep) • ROB workshop to start discussion about degradation • Sun-observing instruments exposed to space environment • Examples from SOHO, Hinode, STEREO, ISS, PROBA2, SDO, PICARD • Recommendations to reduce or correct degradation, for future and ongoing missions • Cleanliness control, calibration stability, redundancy concepts, necessary technical developments
Quasi-continuous 06 Jan 2010 – 05 Feb 2010 Campaigns 06 Jan 2010 – 15 Mar 2012 Comparison of the first 375 hours of LYRA unit 2 and unit 3
Spectral degradation Normalized instrument response loss as experienced by LYRA (2010/11) and SOVA (1992/93) after 200 days of open covers, vs. spectral ranges of their individual channels
LYRA data products: Long-term irradiance Development of daily minimum, i.e. without flares, Sep 2011 – Aug 2012
Results (4) M. Kretzschmar et al.: “Extreme ultraviolet solar irradiance during the rising phase of solar cycle 24 observed by PROBA2/LYRA” Journal of Space Weather an Space Climate 2, A14 (2012) • LYRA channels 3 (Al) and 4 (Zr) in good agreement with TIMED/SEE and SDO/EVE • Channel 3 with reduced variability due to degradation above 19nm, which can be corrected • Channel 3 (corrected) and channel 4 irradiance increased approx. by a factor 2 between Feb 2010 and Nov 2011
Results (5) “Thermal evolution of flares” • Using LYRA and GOES curves, flare profiles can be separated into components • These components correspond to different temperature domains • They can be compared to SDO/EVE spectral data • Shapes look similar, radiometric calibration still TBD • Consequences for Earth atmosphere ? • Consequences for instrument design ?
Flare components ch2-3 = SXR+EUV • “SXR”: emission with log(T)>7 • “EUV residual”: emission with 6<log(T)<7 • “little bump”: emission with log(T)<6 • Compare with SDO/EVE:
Thermal evolution plot • based on: • solar spectra observed by SDO/EVE • contribution functions from the CHIANTI atomic database • (Chamberlin, Milligan & Woods, Solar Physics 279, 23-42, 2012)
M6.7 thermal evolution with LYRA unit 3 • Unit 3 has degraded less than unit 2 • Slightly different residuals for Al and Zr channels • “Cool” component peaks 6 or 5 minutes later than “hot” component
LYRA-GOES vs. SDO/EVE (M6.7) Again, corresponding temporal structures can be observed at various temperature levels.
Thank you for your attention ! • Each year SWAP and LYRA offer a “Guest Investigator Program” • More info, a PROBA2 publication list, and all data products can be found here: http://proba2.sidc.be
Example:M1.1 flare, 28 Feb 2011 • start to rise at same time • parallel in impulsive phase • GOES peaks earlier • LYRA decreases slower • linear factor in pure flare • irradiance
Lyman-alpha signal • LYRA in early 2010 • signal peaks in rising phase • log(T)<6
SOHO/SUMER 0.03 MK 0.7 MK 1.4 MK 3.7 MK 7.7 MK
Problem: LYRA degradationnominal unit 2 (days), spare unit 3 (hours)
Spectral degradation after 200 days in space Experience from SOVA (1992/93) and LYRA (2010/11) combined (“molecular contamination on the first optical surface … caused by UV-induced polymerization”)
C8.7 thermal evolution with LYRA unit 2 • Unit 2 has degraded more than unit 3 • Identical residuals for Al and Zr channels • “Cool” component peaks 19 minutes later than “hot” component
Reminder: LYRA spectral response • channel 2-3: Aluminium filter, nominally 17-80nm • channel 2-4: Zirconium filter, nominally 6-20nm • pre-launch calibration at BESSY • additional SXR components <5 nm, <2 nm • for comparison: GOES 0.1-0.8 nm
C8.7 thermal evolution with LYRA unit 3 • Unit 3 has degraded less than unit 2 • Slightly different residuals for Al and Zr channels • “Cool” component peaks 22 or 19 minutes later than “hot” component
LYRA-GOES vs. SDO/EVE (C8.7) Corresponding temporal structures can be observed at various temperature levels..
M6.7 thermal evolution with LYRA unit 2 • Unit 2 has degraded more than unit 3 • Identical residuals for Al and Zr channels • “Cool” component peaks 5 minutes later than “hot” component
Conclusions • Not the right person to tell you what this means as consequences for the thermosphere, the ionosphere, the geosphere. • Eventually, LYRA and GOES together may be able to tell you something about the thermal evolution of flares… • … with high temporal resolution, and without being full-blown spectrographs. • Or, for future missions: How to get max information with min suitable components? • Of course, we are still working on the radiometric calibration, together with our colleagues from SDO/EVE. • So far, the shapes look similar, but we still have to attach the correct mW/m² to the curves. • See you next time around