800 likes | 1.01k Views
Advanced Buffer Overflow Technique. Greg Hoglund. Attack Theory. Formalize the Attack Method Re-Use of Attack Code Separate the Deployment from the Payload Payloads can be chosen for desired effect Details and Restraints of both Payload and Deployment code. Exploits. A “BUG” in Software
E N D
Advanced Buffer Overflow Technique Greg Hoglund
Attack Theory • Formalize the Attack Method • Re-Use of Attack Code • Separate the Deployment from the Payload • Payloads can be chosen for desired effect • Details and Restraints of both Payload and Deployment code
Exploits • A “BUG” in Software • New bugs reported every day • “Exploit” is code that takes advantage of a bug in order to cause an effect
What can happen? • Machine Crash • Application Crash (most common) • Recoverable Exception • Mobile Code (deadly) • File Access • Denial of Service
Exploits can be grouped • Some bugs are all the same • Some bugs keep coming back • improper filtering • bounds checking • bad authentication • impersonation
Entry -vs- Effect • The attack payload is not the same as the entry point • Missle -vs- Warhead analogy • sometimes called “Egg -vs- Shell”
Exploits come in 2 parts • Injection Vector (deployment) • the actual entry-point, usually tied explicity with the bug itself • Payload (deployed) • usually not tied to bug at all - limited only by imagination. Some restraints.
Injection Vector • Target Dependant • OS Dependant • Application Version Dependant • Protocol Dependant • Encoding Dependant
Payload • Independent of Injection Vector • Still Depends on Machine, Processor, etc. • Like a Virus • Once established, can spread by any means
Payload • Denial of Service • Remote Shell (common) • Worm/Virus • Rootkit (common)
Injector/Payload Pairs • One injector works on ‘n qualified hosts’ • Example - IIS Injector works on ~20% of Web Hosts. • Payload • Remote Shell for control • Shutdown Machine • Shutdown ALL Machines on subnet
Types of Injection • Content Based • characters inserted into a data stream that result in the remote process doing something it shouldn’t. Process is still in control. • Buffer Overflow • poor programming practice subverts architecture of code execution. Process loses control.
Types of Injection • Trust Based • Boot virus/ Floppy/ CD • MACRO virus • Email Attachments • Web Browsing
Who writes Injector Code? • 1995 US Defense Intelligence Agency Report • Cuban Military targets US w/ custom virii • University of Havana, team of less than 20 computer experts • Russian KGB • prior to 1991 coup attempt, KGB has virii intended to shut down US computers in times of war
How hard can it hit? • 1995 E&Y report • 67% of companies hit bit virus • 1996 E&Y report • 63% of companies hit by virus • 1996 UK Information Security Breaches Survey • 51% of companies hit by virus
How hard can it hit? • NCSA 1997 report • 33% of all machines infected with virus • average cost of recovery ~$8000 US dollars • November 1988 Morris Worm • strikes ~6,000 computers (10% of Internet at time) within hours • spreads via Buffer Overflow in fingerd • spreads via Sendmail exploit
How hard can it hit? • 1989, “WANK” Worm • Hits NASA Goddard Space Center • spreads to US DOE High Energy Physics network (HEPNET) • 2 weeks to clean all systems • 1998 ADM-W0RM • buffer overflow in Linux DNS server
Buffer Overflow Injection • Overflow the Stack • Overflow the Heap • Must control the value of the instruction pointer (processor specific) • Goal: Get the Instruction Pointer to point to a user-controlled buffer.
Challenges • Injector/Payload size restrictions • tight coding requirements • Injector and Payload in same buffer • cannot step on each other • Guessing Address Values • sometimes called ‘offsets’ • NULL characters • use encoding and stack tricks
Stack Injection • Stack is used for execution housekeeping as well as buffer storage. • Stack-based buffer must be filled in direction of housekeeping data. • Must overwrite the housekeeping data
IP Address Housekeeping A IP B DI code C SI D FLAG SP BP heap stack
Stack Overflow 00 40 20 08 00 40 20 0C 00 40 20 10 00 40 20 14 00 40 20 18 00 40 20 1C
STOPS The Problem with NULL 00 40 20 08 00 40 20 0C 00 40 20 10 00 40 20 14 00 40 20 18 00 40 20 1C
OK NULL must be PAST housekeeping data 00 40 20 08 00 40 20 0C 00 40 20 10 00 40 20 14 00 40 20 18 00 40 20 1C
Little and Big Endian • On Intel x86 (Little Endian), Values are stored ‘backwards’ - least significant byte goes first: • 00 40 10 FF is stored as: FF 10 40 00
Original Address New Address CD 68 45 7F 0C 20 40 00 We store address in housekeeping data 00 40 21 04 00 40 21 00 00 40 20 0C 00 40 20 08 00 40 20 04 00 40 20 00
New Address 04 21 40 00 Injection is Complete • We control the instruction pointer
New Address 04 21 40 00 Where to put the payload 00 40 21 04 00 40 21 00 00 40 20 0C 00 40 20 08 00 40 20 04 00 40 20 00
Confined Payload • Byte Compression • Use only preloaded functions • Payload doesn’t need to build jumptables • Useable functions must be loaded • Use Hardcoded addresses • Payload designed for a specific process with predictable features • Data portion of payload needs to be small
OK NO NULL in Address 0D 45 68 77 Using more stack for payload 77 40 20 08 77 40 20 0C 77 40 20 10 77 40 20 14 77 40 20 18 77 40 20 1C
When does the address contain a NULL character • Lowland Address - starts with 00 • stack is in lowland on Windows NT • usually 00 40 XX XX • limits size of payload • Highland Address - no zeros in address • stack is in highland under Linux • unlimited payload size
Large payload, Lowland address • We cannot use a lowland address directly, because it limits our payload • We can use a CPU register • We can use stack values that remain undamaged
IP A register points to the stack A IP B DI code C SI D FLAG SP BP heap stack
Call thru a Register • Call eax, call ebx, etc • FF D0 = call eax • FF D3 = call ebx • FF D1 = call ecx • etc, etc
Push a register then return • Push register • push eax = 50 • push ebx = 53 • etc • Then RET • RET = C3
Guessing where to go • We jump to the wrong address • crashes software • payload doesn’t execute • Use NOP (no-op) - a single byte instruction • NOP = 90 • Fill buffer with NOP’s • “NOP Sled”
End up at payload NOP Sled
Inject the Payload into the HEAP • Environment Variables • HTTP headers • Protocol Headers • Recent Transactions • Open Files
IP Execute code on the heap A IP B DI code C SI D FLAG SP BP heap stack
Trespassing the HEAP • Two C++ objects near one another • Environment Variable • Any buffer that can overwrite a pointer • function pointer • string pointer (alter behavior w/o mobile code)
Overwrite the VTABLE • C++ objects have a virtual function table Vtable pointer Member variables grow away from vtable pointer (NT)
Overwrite vtable ptr Overwrite VTABLE • Must have 2 C++ Objects (on heap)
Your own VTABLE • The VTABLE has addresses for all virtual functions in the class. This usually includes a destructor - which will be called when the object is destroyed (deallocated from memory) • Overwrite any function that works
New Handler 04 21 40 00 Overwrite Exception Handler 00 40 21 04 00 40 21 00 00 40 20 0C 00 40 20 08 00 40 20 04 00 40 20 00 Ex-handler Return addr
The Payload • Using Loaded Functions • Encoding our own data • Loading new functions & DLL’s • Making a shell
Real Code DATA NOP Sled The Payload
Getting Bearings • Call RELOC: • RELOC: pop edi • edi now has our code address • we can use this as an offset to our data
Getting Bearings • Call RELOC trick has NULL’s • E8 00 00 00 00 • 5F