190 likes | 526 Views
2. Main messages. Developing countries are integrating and growing rapidly- reflecting in part improved policiesBut trade and non-trade barriers to their integration remain significantDoha deal along current lines would be a step forwardPTAs can help development but this depends on their desig
E N D
1. 1 Trade liberalization, the trade agenda and developing countries Uri Dadush
Director
International Trade Department
World Bank
2. 2 Main messages Developing countries are integrating and growing rapidly- reflecting in part improved policies
But trade and non-trade barriers to their integration remain significant
Doha deal along current lines would be a step forward
PTAs can help development but this depends on their design and implementation
3. 3 Developing countries have been growing fast… and not just in China and India… Turning to the outlook.
This graph illustrates GDP growth since 1980 for developing countries in yellow, developing countries excluding India and China in red and high-income countries in blue.
As you can see, 2006 was another strong year for developing countries. Overall their GDP is expected to come in at about 7 percent. Even excluding China and India and oil exporters, growth was strong at 4.8 percent. Indeed, every region grew by close to 5 or more percent.
Importantly this strong growth has occurred despite relatively modest growth in high-income countries and reflects improved fundamentals, better monetary policy, lower fiscal deficits, a growing share in world trade for developing countries and more structural policies aimed at improving growth potential and the investment climate.
This strong performance is particularly heartening both because of its implications for poverty reduction and because it has occurred in the context of very high oil prices and mediocre performance by high-income countries.
Turning to the outlook.
This graph illustrates GDP growth since 1980 for developing countries in yellow, developing countries excluding India and China in red and high-income countries in blue.
As you can see, 2006 was another strong year for developing countries. Overall their GDP is expected to come in at about 7 percent. Even excluding China and India and oil exporters, growth was strong at 4.8 percent. Indeed, every region grew by close to 5 or more percent.
Importantly this strong growth has occurred despite relatively modest growth in high-income countries and reflects improved fundamentals, better monetary policy, lower fiscal deficits, a growing share in world trade for developing countries and more structural policies aimed at improving growth potential and the investment climate.
This strong performance is particularly heartening both because of its implications for poverty reduction and because it has occurred in the context of very high oil prices and mediocre performance by high-income countries.
4. 4 Countries with rising trade shares in GDP grew 1.5 times faster
5. 5 Developing countries’ policies have improved
6. 6 Developing countries are moving to center stage of the globalization process, spurred by increased exports…
7. 7
8. 8
9. 9
10. 10 Developing countries still face important obstacles Protection is high in areas of their export interest, particularly in agriculture
South-South trade barriers remain high
Services remain highly protected
Major ‘behind the border’ constraints remain Developing countries could have done better if protection did not discriminate against products in which they have comparative advantage particularly in agriculture.
As roughly 70 % of poor people in developing countries live in rural areas, trade barriers in agriculture are extremely important to reduce poverty.
Close to two-thirds of the gains in global welfare from full liberalization of merchandise trade would come from agricultural trade reform, because agriculture is so much more distorted than other sectors.
Trade barriers remain also high in many developing countries, harming consumers – often the poorest, taxing exporters, penalizing exports from other poor countries
South-South trade accounts for 25% of developing country exports and 40% of LDC exports
Tariffs twice as high as in OECD countries;
Example: cocoa beans face tariffs of 30 percent in India and 8 percent in China – in contrast to zero protection in developed countries
Developing countries could have done better if protection did not discriminate against products in which they have comparative advantage particularly in agriculture.
As roughly 70 % of poor people in developing countries live in rural areas, trade barriers in agriculture are extremely important to reduce poverty.
Close to two-thirds of the gains in global welfare from full liberalization of merchandise trade would come from agricultural trade reform, because agriculture is so much more distorted than other sectors.
Trade barriers remain also high in many developing countries, harming consumers – often the poorest, taxing exporters, penalizing exports from other poor countries
South-South trade accounts for 25% of developing country exports and 40% of LDC exports
Tariffs twice as high as in OECD countries;
Example: cocoa beans face tariffs of 30 percent in India and 8 percent in China – in contrast to zero protection in developed countries
11. 11 Rich countries provide high degrees of support to their farmers
12. 12 Developing countries pay most of their foreign tariffs to developing countries This graph shows the total payments that exporters in based in different regions make to get into world markets.
Most money goes to rich countries. Even though tariffs tend to be lower, total collections are high because of the volume.
Many exporters pay huge amounts to neighboring economies. This is because their tariffs are high.
This graph underscores the importance of moving forward in both the N and the S in reducing manufacutring tariffs. This graph shows the total payments that exporters in based in different regions make to get into world markets.
Most money goes to rich countries. Even though tariffs tend to be lower, total collections are high because of the volume.
Many exporters pay huge amounts to neighboring economies. This is because their tariffs are high.
This graph underscores the importance of moving forward in both the N and the S in reducing manufacutring tariffs.
13. 13 Key services markets still highly protected …
14. 14
15. 15 A Doha deal along current lines represents a significant step forward…
Already on the table :
Large cuts in agricultural and industrial tariffs
Lock-in trade-distorting agricultural subsidies
Total removal of agricultural export subsidies
Large increase in aid for trade to address supply-side constraints
Trade facilitation
Failure has costs :
Weaker WTO; proliferation of PTAs
Surging protectionism?
Litigation replaces negotiation The multilateral trading system is particularly important for developing countries, providing predictable, guaranteed market access, rules-based settlement of disputes and transparency of trade regimes
DR compares favorably with the UR. Examples:
It would lead to cuts in all tariff lines with higher tariffs being cut the most and introduction of tariffs caps. The UR comprised an average cut for developed and developing countries (36% and 24%) - some tariff lines escaped cuts entirely, and no cap on the highest tariff.
In the UR, export subsidies were slightly reduced (21% in developed countries, 14% in developing countries). The DR would eliminate export subsidies and discipline equivalent instruments.
The multilateral trading system is particularly important for developing countries, providing predictable, guaranteed market access, rules-based settlement of disputes and transparency of trade regimes
DR compares favorably with the UR. Examples:
It would lead to cuts in all tariff lines with higher tariffs being cut the most and introduction of tariffs caps. The UR comprised an average cut for developed and developing countries (36% and 24%) - some tariff lines escaped cuts entirely, and no cap on the highest tariff.
In the UR, export subsidies were slightly reduced (21% in developed countries, 14% in developing countries). The DR would eliminate export subsidies and discipline equivalent instruments.
16. 16
17. 17 The development impact of PTAs depends on design and implementation Design
Low external tariff barriers
Nonrestrictive rules of origin
Wide coverage with few exclusions; Liberalization of services
Facilitating trade at borders
Appropriate rules
Implementation
Real, not paper PTAs
PTAs to promote and reinforce domestic reform agenda
18. 18 Unilateral liberalization is the main driver
19. 19