1 / 15

High Performance: No Decisions Playgrounds @ City of Roseville, MN

High Performance: No Decisions Playgrounds @ City of Roseville, MN. Background. 69% citizens would likely vote for a tax increase to fund program Result: $19M citywide park renewal program Playgrounds: $1.6M (8%). Master Plan. Renewal Program. Citizen Support. Typical Evaluation Process.

trynt
Download Presentation

High Performance: No Decisions Playgrounds @ City of Roseville, MN

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. High Performance:No DecisionsPlaygrounds @ City of Roseville, MN

  2. Background • 69% citizens would likely vote for a tax increase to fund program • Result: $19M citywide park renewal program • Playgrounds: $1.6M (8%) Master Plan Renewal Program Citizen Support

  3. Typical Evaluation Process

  4. Best Value Approach • Biggest risk: neighborhood engagement • Evaluation factors: • Risk • Value Add • Capability • Interview • Cost

  5. Evaluation

  6. Download the evals • Make a table on a sheet of paper: • Go to http://bit.do/ouc • Click on “Playground Submittals” folder

  7. Submit Answers • Back to http://bit.do/ouc • Click on “Playground Eval Form” and then “Open”

  8. Your ratings…

  9. Actual ratings…

  10. Project Results • 50% ahead of schedule (from estimate) • 0% change orders • 100% city satisfaction

  11. Overall program results

  12. Citizen Feedback 121 unique surveys, representing 14 parks

  13. So, what risk is there on the project? Potential Risk Applicable? NO Consultants won’t understand how to propose NO There will not be enough proposals (competition) NO The citizens do not support the program NO City (non - experts) cannot accurately describe their needs YES Consultants (even with lots of education) will revert NO The process will not work in ___________ scope area NO There is no construction management firm NO The process will take too much time and effort NO The vendor proposes a schedule that the City cannot meet YES Political risk (city council, naysayers, internal departments)

  14. Comments / Questions Jake Smithwick Jake.Smithwick@asu.edu

More Related