1 / 8

Comparative analysis of existing development plans and strategies

This study compares existing development plans and strategies to create a Common Spatial Development Strategy. It aims to understand planning realities, common interests, and differences. Analyzing development documents from Latvia and Russia, the study delves into document details, updates, implementation mechanisms, and development goals. It includes SWOT analysis, major indicators, and personal opinions on the documents' design, content, and language.

tstephanie
Download Presentation

Comparative analysis of existing development plans and strategies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Comparative analysis of existing development plans and strategies "Development of Common Spatial Development Strategy (SDS) for Latgale and Vidzeme regions, Pskov and Leningradskaja oblastj” Neils Balgalis, Grupa93 Valmiera_07/05/07

  2. Why analyze? • existing plans and their role • to understand realities of planning process (driving forces, implementation) • to find out the common interests of cities and regions • to define differences (if any)

  3. Preliminary list of development documents (26?) Development plans and strategies: • Latvia (Regional development strategy, Spatial Development plan, development strategies of cities and towns, sector specific strategies, etc.) • Russia (...)

  4. Analysis (1) • Name of the document, number of pages, annexes • Annotation (no more than ½ page) • Approval date, institution • Document preparation time (from/to), involved persons (leaders (project managers) and executors (who wrote the plan?). • Involved institutions (name, addresses, contact persons, web page)

  5. Analysis (2) • Document updates (describe process) • Implementation and control mechanisms (and reality) • Table of Contents • SWOT analysis • Development vision

  6. Analysis (3) • Main development aims/objectives, tasks, priorities, strategical development directions (divided by levels) • Major indicators (if any) • Reflection of following measures/activities/projects: • development of transport infrastructure, services and accessibility • polycentric development of cities and towns • environment and nature protection • development of information society • political co-operation. • Business support activities/measures • Personal opinion about the document (design, ease of use, language, content)

  7. Analysis (4) • How many references you could find in the internet to that document? • Does someone knows about the document existence (ask 5 friends, 5 business persons and 5 passers-by) • Opinion of politicians about the document (ask 3 politicians in charge) • Availability of document for general public • Key words of the document (name 5) • List of projects (if applicable) • Cartographical information (please attach scanned/color copies)

More Related