120 likes | 268 Views
Mobile IP Network examples. Adrian Terranova August 17, 2010 aterranova@gmail.com Adrian.j.terranova@jpmchase.com. Mobile IP example Physical / L2 / L3. Mobile Network. Transit Network. Transit Network. Transit Network. Transit network . Mobile IP example Physical / L2 / L3.
E N D
Mobile IP Network examples Adrian Terranova August 17, 2010 aterranova@gmail.com Adrian.j.terranova@jpmchase.com
Mobile IP example Physical / L2 / L3 Mobile Network Transit Network Transit Network Transit Network Transit network
Mobile IP example Physical / L2 / L3 Mobile Network Transit Network Transit Network Transit Network Transit network
Mobile IP example Physical / L2 / L3 IP Cage Transit Network Transit Network Transit Network Transit network
Mobile IP example Physical / L2 / L3 IP Cage Transit Network Transit Network Transit Network Transit network
Datacenter Mobile IP components Physical / L2 / L3 Servers Dedicated subnet Router OSPF Transit Network OSPF Transit Network OSPF Transit Network BGP Transit network
Virtual Cage / Single Datacenter Mobile IP Physical / L2 / L3 A10- 192.168.10.0/24 A0 - 1.1.1.100/24 A10- 192.168.10.0/24 A0 - 1.1.1.100/24 A10- 192.168.10.0/24 A0 - 1.1.1.100/24 OSPF Transit Network A0 - 1.1.1.3/24 OSPF Transit Network A0 - 1.1.1.2/24 OSPF Transit Network A0 - 1.1.1.1/24 T- 5.5.5.2/24 T- 5.5.5.3/24 T - 5.5.5.1/24 Single site BGP Transit network 5.0.0.0/24 T- 5.5.5.5/24 5.5.5.5 routing table 192.168.10.0/24 gateway 5.5.5.1 5.5.5.5 routing table 192.168.10.0/24 gateway 5.5.5.2 5.5.5.5 routing table 192.168.10.0/24 gateway 5.5.5.3
Multi Datacenter Mobile IP example Physical / L2 / L3 Site A A10- 192.168.10.0/24 A0 - 1.1.1.100/24 A10- 192.168.10.0/24 A0 - 1.1.1.100/24 Site B OSPF Transit Network A0 - 1.1.1.3/24 OSPF Transit Network A0 - 1.1.1.1/24 T - 5.5.5.1/24 T- 5.5.5.3/24 Multi site BGP Transit network 5.0.0.0/24 T- 5.5.5.5/24 5.5.5.5 routing table 192.168.10.0/24 gateway 5.5.5.1 5.5.5.5 routing table 192.168.10.0/24 gateway 5.5.5.3
Technology engineering towers minimize impacts inside of their domains, without regard to impacts on other groups. Infrastructure consolidation focuses along technology fault lines, with focus on minimizing the impact to the technology managers without regard to the users or long-term business impacts of particular business decisions. Technology refreshes focus on technology resource optimization vs corporate resource optimization. Data-center / Storage / Network / Servers need to provide flexibility to scale any layer up or down. A component re-factor should be cheaper, in-sourcing / out-sourcing should be faster and more dollar efficient thru time. High-usage customers should do the most work, and work should be linear in growth function, not exponential Problem Statement
All Non-functional • Time to market • Scale-up / Scale-down • l2 (network / san) • l3 (network / LB) • Segmentation • Isolation • Encapsulation • Testing • Hard Split Shared Components • Fault Domain • Performance / Capacity Domain • Change Domain • Lifecycle management • Reduced effort for DR testing (production IS) • Minimized changes from production to DR • Reduced resources to support business requirements Benefits
Intra-site relocation / rehosting Inter-site relocation / rehosting Out-sourcing In-sourcing Service / Department demarcation Use Cases
Intra-site relocation / rehosting Inter-site relocation / rehosting Out-sourcing In-sourcing Service / Department demarcation Use Cases