Download
1 / 8
80 likes | 109 Views
3-3 Proving Lines Parallel: Recall that the converse of a theorem is found by exchanging the hypothesis and conclusion. The converse of a theorem is not automatically true. If it is true, it must be stated as a postulate or proved as a separate theorem.
E N D
3-3 Proving Lines Parallel: Recall that the converse of a theorem is found by exchanging the hypothesis and conclusion. The converse of a theorem is not automatically true. If it is true, it must be stated as a postulate or proved as a separate theorem.
Thrm 3.5: Converse Corresponding Angles Theorem NOTE: Again, many textbooks state this as a postulate however this author argues that a parallel line is a rigid transformation and thus the angles are also a rigid transformation.
3-6 3-7 3-8 consecutive 5 supp 6 →║ Also, Converse of CE Theorem: CE supp → ║ Proofs for these theorems???
Check It Out! Example 2b Refer to the diagram. Use the given information and the theorems you have learned to show that r║s. m3 = 2x, m7 = (x + 50), x = 50
Example 3: Proving Lines Parallel Given: ℓ║m , 1 3 Prove:p║r
Check It Out! Example 3 Given: 1 4, 3 and 4 are supplementary. Prove: ℓ║m
Lesson Quiz: Part I Name the postulate or theorem that proves p║r. 1. 4 5 Conv. of Alt. Int. sThm. 2. 2 7 Conv. of Alt. Ext. sThm. 3. 3 7 Conv. of Corr. sPost. 4. 3 and 5 are supplementary. Conv. of Consecutive Int. sThm.
Theorem 3.9: Transitive Property for Parallel Lines If s║t and t║v then s║v by transitive property. Proof? s t v
