190 likes | 342 Views
Department of Education. NCOP SELECT COMMITTEE ON FINANCE MEETING 6 FEBRUARY 2007. OVERVIEW. The objective is to report in terms of Section 32 of the PFMA 2007/08 expenditure as at 31 December 2007 Conditional Grants Spending Capital expenditure
E N D
Department of Education NCOP SELECT COMMITTEE ON FINANCE MEETING 6 FEBRUARY 2007
OVERVIEW The objective is to report in terms of Section 32 of the PFMA • 2007/08 expenditure as at 31 December 2007 • Conditional Grants Spending • Capital expenditure • Progress with the implementation of infrastructure projects • Achievements, Challenges and Remedial Measures • Monitoring arrangements within FSDoE
EXPENDITURE PER PROGRAMME AS AT 31 DECEMBER 2007 • Percentage spending excludes commitments in all instances 3
OVERVIEW OF UNDERSPENDING PER PROGRAMME Programme1: Administration ICT equipment(R36 million): Procurement has started and roll-out will commence from Nov 2007 Programme 2: Public Ordinary Schools Non Section 21 LTSM in Districts. Delivery of Stationery to date 98%, all distributed to schools. Textbooks delivery is 82%. Awaiting backorders from Publishers. Programme 5: FET colleges Compensation of employees: Outstanding claims for part-time educators and the implications of the FET Act Programme 6: ABET The amount of R4,9million on goods and services will be used to conduct training on new unit standards and site based assessment tasks in February 2008 Programme 7: ECD Compensation of employees Transfers to centres delayed due to non-compliance Programme 8: Auxiliary and Associated Services Payment for capital projects is according to schedule and no overspending is envisaged. 4
EXPENDITURE BY ECONOMIC CLASSIFICATION 31 DECEMBER 2007 Households includes bursaries paid to learners at tertiary institutions including leave gratuities. Bursaries are paid in Jan-Feb 2008 while gratuities are paid through the financial year 5
CONDITIONAL GRANTS SPENDING AS AT 31 DECEMBER 2007 R36, 574 million = transferred to the Colleges NSNP will be supplemented by R1,2million from the equitable share to cover for the increased number of ALL primary school learners fed. 6
ACTUAL SPENDING BY FET COLLEGES ON RECAP GRANT AS AT 31 DECEMBER 2007 Taking into consideration commitments of R5million,expenditure will improve to 75,3%.Commitments are largely for buying/building of new classroooms,laboratories,offices etc 7
ACHIEVEMENTS: FET RECAPITALIZATION GRANT • RESKILLING STAFF TO OFFER RESPONSIVE PROGRAMMES • 382 FET Staff received training according to identified needs to ensure effective teaching and learning as well as managing the implementation of the National Curriculum (vocational) [NC(v)] programmes. • UPGRADING PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE OF FET COLLEGES Colleges utilised funds to complete the following projects: • 1 Student Support Centre was built and completed at Goldfields College. • 5 Workshops, classrooms, laboratories and offices as per identified needs were upgraded at the four FET colleges. • 2 Campus sites were upgraded at Motheo and Maluti Colleges. • Equipment was purchased to support teaching and learning of NC(v) levels 2 and 3 programmes. • LTSM were purchased for NC(v) levels 2 and 3 programmes to ensure effective and efficient training. • Security and control systems have been installed at all four FET Colleges - boom gates, asset registers, Coltech for learner registration and keeping of financial records, etc. • CONNECTIVITY TO IMPROVE COMMUNICATION, INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND CURRICULUM DELIVERY • All the campuses of Flavius Mareka, Goldfields and Motheo FET Colleges are connected with their respective Central Offices through a Management Information System, electronically.
OVERALL ACHIEVEMENTS: FET RECAPITALIZATION GRANT • Several monitoring visits were conducted by DoE and the FSDoE in order to ensure compliance to financial management as well as the management of the Recapitalization Conditional Grant at FET Colleges. • DoE and FSDoE visited FET Colleges on a regular basis to assist and ensure implementation of management systems (e.g. Financial Management, Asset Management, Supply Chain Management and Recap Management Systems)
FET RECAPITALIZATION CHALLENGES • Problems with contractors: • Do not keep to specifications in Service Level Agreements • Fall behind schedule • Not sufficient response from competent contractors to tender • Building material not delivered on time (especially steel constructions)
INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAMMES The Capital Infrastructure Programme consist of the following: Major Capital implemented by Public Works with a focus on elimination of platooning and overcrowding. (Platooning will be eliminated in the next two financial years) The Minor Capital projects implemented by the Department of education in collaboration with SGB’s targets renovations, maintenance and the provisioning of basic services like water, sanitation and electrification. (Agreements with DWAF and ESKOM are in place to assist with implementation) 15
INFRASTRUCTURE EXPENDITURE End of Third Quarter expenditure – 82% vs second quarter – 44% The expenditure has increased due to the fact that most contractors were performing according to expectations. The 100% mark is expected to be reached by end February 2008. Regular monthly monitoring meetings between Implementing Agency and Client. Monthly reports are supplied and discussed Intensive quarterly reviews led by Provincial Treasury assists in briefing the Executing Authorities in the province 17
Monitoring capacity in the Department Monthly Finance Committee meetings are held to discuss underspending and remedial actions Quarterly review sessions are held to provide feedback on service delivery and the budget. Monthly expenditure reports are sent for the attention and the comment of the HOD and the Executive authority. Each branch is allocated a management accountant to assist with all financial related queries including budget management Letters are written to managers who underspent to inform them of the status quo and the implications of their underspending. Where underspending persist affected manager are brought before the executive leadership and the MEC to account for their actions. Where managers are not able to spent despite all the interventions funds are diverted and spent in line with objectives of the department.