1 / 20

Patient Turnover and Nursing Staff Adequacy

Patient Turnover and Nursing Staff Adequacy. Lynn Unruh, PhD, RN, LHRM Myron D. Fottler, PhD. AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting San Diego, June 6-8, 2004. Research Problem. Common hospital nurse staffing measures: nurses or hours of nursing care patients or patient days of care

ulf
Download Presentation

Patient Turnover and Nursing Staff Adequacy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Patient Turnover and Nursing Staff Adequacy Lynn Unruh, PhD, RN, LHRM Myron D. Fottler, PhD AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting San Diego, June 6-8, 2004

  2. Research Problem • Common hospital nurse staffing measures: nurses or hours of nursing care patients or patient days of care • Need to also consider intensity of nursing care • Staffing needs vary with the amount and type of care provided for each of those patients

  3. Research Problem • An ideal measure of nursing staff adequacy should indicate the volume of nurses of a certain skill level that is necessary for the given volume of patients given the intensity of nursing care required for those patients during their stay: # of RNs # of patient days X intensity of RN care for those patient days

  4. Nursing Care Intensity • Indicators of nursing care intensity: • Patient acuity • Patient turnover

  5. Patient Turnover • As patient turnover increases • Nursing care must be delivered in a shorter period of time • Holding patient acuity and total nursing care requirements for the patient stay constant • Admission, transfer, and discharge procedures take up an increasing proportion of the patient’s stay

  6. Patient Turnover • An available measure for patient turnover is patient length of stay • The number of days a patient is an inpatient in the hospital. • The inverse of patient length of stay produces a fraction that ranges between 0 and 1 • Lower amounts indicate lower turnover, and vice versa.

  7. Research Questions • Does adjusting nurse staffing data for patient turnover, as measured by the inverse of patient LOS, significantly alter the measurement of nurse staffing and changes in nurse staffing? • What is the trend in nurse staffing when measures adjust for both patient turnover and patient acuity?

  8. Sample and Data Sources • All general, acute-care Pennsylvania hospitals 1991-2000 (N= 166-213) • Data obtained from: • Pennsylvania Department of Health • Yearly filled RN, LPN and Nursing Assistant FTEs • American Hospital Association • APDC* and LOS • Patient days of care include outpatient care • Atlas MediQual System • Patient acuity

  9. Design • Assess the trend in the average patient LOS and turnover (inverse of length of stay). • Create a patient turnover index using 1991 as the base year, and adjust nurse staffing measures for patient turnover using this index • Compare the standard and new measures using paired sample t-tests • Assess whether the trend over time in nurse staffing utilizing the new measure is significantly different than the old measure using paired sample t-tests • Analyze the trend in nurse staffing adjusted for both patient turnover and acuity

  10. Results Average Patient Length of Stay in Pennsylvania Hospitals, 1991-2000

  11. Results Average Patient Turnover in Pennsylvania Hospitals 1991-2000

  12. Results RN/1,000 APDC in Pennsylvania Hospitals 1991-2000 p<.01=*, p<.001=**, p<.0001=***

  13. Results LPN/1,000 APDC in Pennsylvania Hospitals 1991-2000 p<.01=*, p<.001=**, p<.0001=***

  14. Results NA/1,000 APDC in Pennsylvania Hospitals 1991-2000 p<.01=*, p<.001=**, p<.0001=***

  15. Results Percentage Change in RN/1,000 APDC in Pennsylvania Hospitals p<.01=*, p<.001=**, p<.0001=***

  16. Results Percentage Change in LPN/1,000 APDC in Pennsylvania Hospitals p<.01=*, p<.001=**, p<.0001=***

  17. Results Percentage Change in NA/1,000 APDC in Pennsylvania Hospitals p<.01=*, p<.001=**, p<.0001=***

  18. Results Percentage Change in Nursing Staff/1,000 APDC in Pennsylvania Hospitals 1991-2000 p<.01=*, p<.001=**, p<.0001=***

  19. Results Nursing Staff/1,000 Adjusted APDC* in Pennsylvania Hospitals 1991-2000 % Change 1991-2000: RNs -44% LPNs -65% NAs -48% *APDC adjusted for patient acuity and turnover

  20. Conclusions • Unadjusted nurse workload measures fail to adequately address the work intensity issue and, consequently, significantly underestimate nurse workloads • Perceptions of nurses themselves, the media, and others concerning increasing nurse workloads/declining staffing ratios are justified and supported by our results • Future research on nurse staffing or nurse workload issues should adjust for both patient acuity and patient turnover

More Related