1 / 26

Experimental Analysis of Choice

Experimental Analysis of Choice. Methods : concurrent schedules, concurrent chains, delay discounting, foraging contingencies, behavioral economic contingencies.

ull
Download Presentation

Experimental Analysis of Choice

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Experimental Analysis of Choice • Methods: concurrent schedules, concurrent chains, delay discounting, foraging contingencies, behavioral economic contingencies. • Models and Issues: matching/melioration, maximizing/optimality, hyperbolic discounting, behavioral economic/ecological models, behavior momentum, molar versus molecular issues, concepts of response strength. • Applications: self-control, drug abuse, gambling, risk, economics, behavioral ecology, social/political decision making.

  2. Operant Conditioning

  3. Operant Conditioning

  4. Operant Conditioning

  5. HERRNSTEIN’S HYPERBOLA

  6. Operant Conditioning

  7. Operant Conditioning

  8. Operant Conditioning

  9. MATCHING LAW Herrnstein R1 / (R1+R2) = r1 / (r1+r2) Baum R1 / R2 = b (r1 / r2)a

  10. MATCHING LAW • R1 / R2 = r1 / r2 Herrnstein • R1 / R2 = b (r1 / r2)a Baum • V1 / V2 = b (r1 / r2)a1 (M1 / M2)a2 (D2 / D1)a3 • Rachlin’s “Value”

  11. Melioration: A Theory of Matching “To make better”: Behavior shifts to the higher return (lower cost) or equal local rates of reinforcement. (R1 / R2) = (r1 / r2), or (r1 / R1) = (r2 / R2) (return). (T1 / T2) = (r1 / r2), or (r1 / T1) = (r2 / T2) (local rate of reinforcement).

  12. Example: Conc VI 30”VI 120” Suppose in the first hour of exposure 1000 responses were emitted to each alternative: (VI 30”) r1 / R1 = (120 rfs / 1000 resps). Return = 0.120 (VI 120”) r2 / R2 = (30 rfs / 1000 resps). Return = 0.03 Ultimately behavior will shift toward the higher return. What will be the result? 120 / (1000 + x) = 30 / (1000 – x); x = 600. 120 / 1600 = 30 / 400 i.e., matching (80% responses on VI 30” alternative). Return = 0.075 rfs/resp on each alternative.

  13. Problem: Conc VR 30 VR 120 ALL responses will ultimately be made to the VR 30 alternative. This is consistent with matching, but same would be said if all the responses were made to the VR 120 alternative. But melioration can predict which alternative should receive all the responses: VR 30: r1/ R1 = 1/30; VR 120: r2/ R2 = 1/120. These cannot change, so shifting to the higher return means all the responses will go to VR 30 alternative.

  14. Operant Conditioning

  15. Operant Conditioning

  16. Operant Conditioning

  17. FUNCTIONAL PROPERTIES AND CURVE FITTING • What is the “real” delay function? Vt = V0 / (1 + Kt) Vt = V0/(1 + Kt)s Vt = V0/(M + Kts) Vt = V0/(M + ts) Vt = V0 exp(-Mt)

  18. Operant Conditioning

  19. Operant Conditioning

  20. Operant Conditioning

  21. Operant Conditioning

  22. Operant Conditioning

  23. Operant Conditioning

More Related