1 / 48

Testing AdS/CFT at LHC

Testing AdS/CFT at LHC. William Horowitz The Ohio State University February 6, 2009. With many thanks to Yuri Kovchegov and Ulrich Heinz. First, a Perturbative Detour. pQCD Success in High-p T at RHIC:. Y. Akiba for the PHENIX collaboration , hep-ex/0510008. (circa 2005).

ulla
Download Presentation

Testing AdS/CFT at LHC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Testing AdS/CFT at LHC William Horowitz The Ohio State University February 6, 2009 With many thanks to Yuri Kovchegov and Ulrich Heinz High-pT Physics at LHC

  2. First, a Perturbative Detour High-pT Physics at LHC

  3. pQCD Success in High-pT at RHIC: Y. Akiba for the PHENIX collaboration, hep-ex/0510008 (circa 2005) • Consistency: RAA(h)~RAA(p) • Null Control: RAA(g)~1 • GLV Calculation: Theory~Data for reasonable fixed L~5 fm and dNg/dy~dNp/dy • Assuming pQCD E-loss, let’s clear up some myths High-pT Physics at LHC

  4. Surface Emission: Red Herring? • If you believe in pQCD E-loss, observed jets come from deep in the medium HT, AMY, ASW WHDG BDMPS + Hydro T. Renk and K. J. Eskola, PoS LHC07, 032 (2007) S. Wicks, et al., Nucl. Phys. A784, 426 (2007) S. A. Bass, et al., arXiv:0808.0908 [nucl-th]. High-pT Physics at LHC

  5. Fragility is Fragile • Linear-linear plot of RAA(qhat) is the incorrect way to think about the problem PHENIX, Phys. Rev. C77, 064907 (2008) K. J. Eskola, et al., Nucl. Phys. A747, 511 (2005) High-pT Physics at LHC

  6. Fragility is Fragile (cont’d) • If you believe in pQCD E-loss, RAA is NOT a fragile probe of the medium • Linear on a log-log plot • Double => halve RAA • Similar results for WHDG, GLV, AMY, ZOWW, etc. PHENIX, Phys. Rev. C77, 064907 (2008) High-pT Physics at LHC

  7. Quantitative Extraction • Model params to within ~20% • Experimental error only!! • Sys. theor. err. could be quite large • Running coupling uncertainties • Smaller at LHC? • Multi-gluon correlations? • Larger at LHC? • Handling of geometry • … • See also TECHQM wiki: PHENIX, PRC77, 064907 (2008) https://wiki.bnl.gov/TECHQM/index.php/WHDG S. Wicks, et al., Nucl. Phys. A783, 493 (2007) High-pT Physics at LHC

  8. v2 too small NPE supp. too large Trouble for High-pT wQGP Picture p0 v2 M Tannenbaum, High-pT Physics at LHC ‘09 NPE v2 STAR, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 192301 (2007) Pert. at LHC energies? PHENIX, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 172301 (2007) High-pT Physics at LHC

  9. Back to the FutureFifth Dimension High-pT Physics at LHC

  10. Motivation for High-pT AdS • Why study AdS E-loss models? • Many calculations vastly simpler • Complicated in unusual ways • Data difficult to reconcile with pQCD • pQCD quasiparticle picture leads to dominant q ~ m ~ .5 GeV mom. transfers => Nonperturbatively large as • Use data to learn about E-loss mechanism, plasma properties • Domains of self-consistency crucial for understanding High-pT Physics at LHC

  11. Strong Coupling Calculation • The supergravity double conjecture: QCD  SYM  IIB • IF super Yang-Mills (SYM) is not too different from QCD, & • IF Maldacena conjecture is true • Then a tool exists to calculate strongly-coupled QCD in SUGRA High-pT Physics at LHC

  12. AdS/CFT Energy Loss Models • Langevin Diffusion • Collisional energy loss for heavy quarks • Restricted to low pT • pQCD vs. AdS/CFT computation of D, the diffusion coefficient • ASW/LRW model • Radiative energy loss model for all parton species • pQCD vs. AdS/CFT computation of • Debate over its predicted magnitude • Heavy Quark Drag calculation • Embed string representing HQ into AdS geometry • Includes all E-loss modes • Empty space calculation: • Previously: thermalized QGP plasma, temp. T, gcrit<~Mq/T Moore and Teaney, Phys.Rev.C71:064904,2005 Casalderrey-Solana and Teaney, Phys.Rev.D74:085012,2006; JHEP 0704:039,2007 BDMPS, Nucl.Phys.B484:265-282,1997 Armesto, Salgado, and Wiedemann, Phys. Rev. D69 (2004) 114003 Liu, Ragagopal, Wiedemann, PRL 97:182301,2006; JHEP 0703:066,2007 Kharzeev, arXiv:0806.0358 [hep-ph] Gubser, Phys.Rev.D74:126005,2006 Herzog, Karch, Kovtun, Kozcaz, Yaffe, JHEP 0607:013,2006 High-pT Physics at LHC

  13. Energy Loss Comparison D7 Probe Brane • AdS/CFT Drag: dpT/dt ~ -(T2/Mq) pT t x z = 0 v Q, m 3+1D Brane Boundary zm = l1/2/2pm D3 Black Brane (horizon) zh = 1/pT Black Hole z = ¥ • Similar to Bethe-Heitler dpT/dt ~ -(T3/Mq2) pT • Very different from LPM dpT/dt ~ -LT3 log(pT/Mq) High-pT Physics at LHC

  14. RAA Approximation y=0 RHIC LHC • Above a few GeV, quark production spectrum is approximately power law: • dN/dpT ~ 1/pT(n+1), where n(pT) has some momentum dependence • We can approximate RAA(pT): • RAA ~ (1-e(pT))n(pT), where pf = (1-e)pi (i.e. e = 1-pf/pi) High-pT Physics at LHC

  15. Looking for a Robust, Detectable Signal erad~as L2 log(pT/Mq)/pT • Use LHC’s large pT reach and identification of c and b to distinguish between pQCD, AdS/CFT • Asymptotic pQCD momentum loss: • String theory drag momentum loss: • Independent of pT and strongly dependent on Mq! • T2 dependence in exponent makes for a very sensitive probe • Expect: epQCD 0 vs. eAdSindep of pT!! • dRAA(pT)/dpT > 0 => pQCD; dRAA(pT)/dpT < 0 => ST eST~ 1 - Exp(-m L), m = pl1/2T2/2Mq S. Gubser, Phys.Rev.D74:126005 (2006); C. Herzog et al. JHEP 0607:013,2006 High-pT Physics at LHC

  16. Model Inputs • AdS/CFT Drag: nontrivial mapping of QCD to SYM • “Obvious”: as = aSYM = const., TSYM = TQCD • D 2pT = 3 inspired: as = .05 • pQCD/Hydro inspired: as = .3 (D 2pT ~ 1) • “Alternative”: l = 5.5, TSYM = TQCD/31/4 • Start loss at thermalization time t0; end loss at Tc • WHDG convolved radiative and elastic energy loss • as = .3 • WHDG radiative energy loss (similar to ASW) • = 40, 100 • Use realistic, diffuse medium with Bjorken expansion • PHOBOS (dNg/dy = 1750); KLN model of CGC (dNg/dy = 2900) High-pT Physics at LHC

  17. LHC c, b RAA pT Dependence WH and M. Gyulassy, Phys. Lett. B 666, 320 (2008) • LHC Prediction Zoo: What a Mess! • Let’s go through step by step • Unfortunately, large suppression pQCD similar to AdS/CFT • Large suppression leads to flattening • Use of realistic geometry and Bjorken expansion allows saturation below .2 • Significant rise in RAA(pT) for pQCD Rad+El • Naïve expectations met in full numerical calculation: dRAA(pT)/dpT > 0 => pQCD; dRAA(pT)/dpT < 0 => ST High-pT Physics at LHC

  18. An Enhanced Signal • But what about the interplay between mass and momentum? • Take ratio of c to b RAA(pT) • pQCD: Mass effects die out with increasing pT • Ratio starts below 1, asymptotically approaches 1. Approach is slower for higher quenching • ST: drag independent of pT, inversely proportional to mass. Simple analytic approx. of uniform medium gives RcbpQCD(pT) ~ nbMc/ncMb ~ Mc/Mb ~ .27 • Ratio starts below 1; independent of pT RcbpQCD(pT) ~ 1 - asn(pT) L2 log(Mb/Mc) ( /pT) High-pT Physics at LHC

  19. LHC RcAA(pT)/RbAA(pT) Prediction • Recall the Zoo: WH and M. Gyulassy, Phys. Lett. B 666, 320 (2008) • Taking the ratio cancels most normalization differences seen previously • pQCD ratio asymptotically approaches 1, and more slowly so for increased quenching (until quenching saturates) • AdS/CFT ratio is flat and many times smaller than pQCD at only moderate pT • Distinguish rad and el contributions? WH and M. Gyulassy, Phys. Lett. B 666, 320 (2008) High-pT Physics at LHC

  20. Additional Discerning Power • Consider ratio for ALICE pT reach mc = mb = 0 • Adil-Vitev in-medium fragmentation rapidly approaches, and then broaches, 1 • Does not include partonic E-loss, which will be nonnegligable as ratio goes to unity • Higgs (non)mechanism => Rc/Rb ~ 1 ind. of pT High-pT Physics at LHC

  21. Not So Fast! D7 Probe Brane Q • Speed limit estimate for applicability of AdS drag • g < gcrit = (1 + 2Mq/l1/2 T)2 ~ 4Mq2/(l T2) • Limited by Mcharm ~ 1.2 GeV • Similar to BH LPM • gcrit ~ Mq/(lT) • No single T for QGP Worldsheet boundary Spacelikeif g > gcrit z Trailing String “Brachistochrone” x D3 Black Brane High-pT Physics at LHC

  22. LHC RcAA(pT)/RbAA(pT) Prediction(with speed limits) WH and M. Gyulassy, Phys. Lett. B 666, 320 (2008) • T(t0): (, highest T—corrections unlikely for smaller momenta • Tc: ], lowest T—corrections likely for higher momenta High-pT Physics at LHC

  23. Derivation of BH Speed Limit I • Constant HQ velocity • Assume const. v kept by F.v • Critical field strength Ec = M2/l½ • E > Ec: Schwinger pair prod. • Limits g < gc ~ T2/lM2 • Alleviated by allowing var. v • Drag similar to const. v Minkowski Boundary z = 0 F.v = dp/dt Q E v zM = l½ / 2pM D7 dp/dt J. Casalderrey-Solana and D. Teaney, JHEP 0704, 039 (2007) D3 zh = 1/pT Herzog, Karch, Kovtun, Kozcaz, Yaffe, JHEP 0607:013 (2006) z = ¥ High-pT Physics at LHC

  24. Derivation of BH Speed Limit II • Local speed of light • BH Metric => varies with depth z • v(z)2 < 1 – (z/zh)4 • HQ located at zM = l½/2pM • Limits g < gc ~ T2/lM2 • Same limit as from const. v • Mass a strange beast • Mtherm < Mrest • Mrest¹ Mkin • Note that M >> T Minkowski Boundary z = 0 F.v = dp/dt Q E v zM = l½ / 2pM D7 S. S. Gubser, Nucl. Phys. B 790, 175 (2008) dp/dt D3 zh = 1/pT z = ¥ High-pT Physics at LHC

  25. Universality and Applicability • How universal are drag results? • Examine different theories • Investigate alternate geometries • When does the calculation break down? • Depends on the geometry used High-pT Physics at LHC

  26. New Geometries vshock Q vshock z Q z x x Constant T Thermal Black Brane Shock Geometries Nucleus as Shock J Friess, et al., PRD75:106003, 2007 DIS Embedded String in Shock Before After Albacete, Kovchegov, Taliotis, JHEP 0807, 074 (2008) Bjorken-Expanding Medium High-pT Physics at LHC

  27. Shocking Motivation • Warm-up for full Bjorken metric R. A. Janik and R. B. Peschanski, Phys. Rev. D 73, 045013 (2006) • No local speed of light limit! • Metric yields -1 < v < 1 • In principle, applicable to all quark masses for all momenta • Subtlety in exchange of limits? High-pT Physics at LHC

  28. Standard Method of Attack • Parameterize string worldsheet • Xm(t, s) • Plug into Nambu-Goto action • Varying SNG yields EOM for Xm • Canonical momentum flow (in t, s) High-pT Physics at LHC

  29. Shock Geometry Results • Three t-ind. solutions (static gauge): Xm = (t, x(z), 0,0, z) • x(z) = c, ± m½ z3/3 • Constant solution unstable • Time-reversed negative x solution unphysical • Sim. to x ~ z3/3, z << 1, for const. T BH geom. Q z = 0 vshock + m ½ z3/3 - m ½ z3/3 c x z = ¥ High-pT Physics at LHC

  30. HQ Momentum Loss in the Shock Relate m to nuclear properties • Use AdS dictionary: m ~ T--/Nc2 • T-- = (boosted den. of scatterers) x (mom.) • T-- = Nc2 (L3 p+/L) x (p+) • Nc2 gluons per nucleon in shock • L is typical mom. scale; L-1 typical dist. scale • p+: mom. of shock gluons as seen by HQ • p: mom. of HQ as seen by shock => m = L2p+2 x(z) = m½ z3/3 => High-pT Physics at LHC

  31. HQ Rest Frame Shock Rest Frame HQ Drag in the Shock Mq L vsh Mq vq = -vsh 1/L vq = 0 i i vsh = 0 • Recall for BH: • Shock gives exactly the same drag as BH for L = p T High-pT Physics at LHC

  32. Conclusions and Outlook for • the LHC Experiment: • Use data to test E-loss mechanism • RcAA(pT)/RbAA(pT) wonderful tool • p+Pb and Direct-g Pb+Pb critical null controls • the AdS Drag: • Applicability and universality crucial • Both investigated in shock geom. • Shock geometry reproduces BH momentum loss • Unrestricted in momentum reach • Variable velocity case nontrivial • Future work • Time-dependent shock treatment • AdS E-loss in Bjorken expanding medium High-pT Physics at LHC

  33. Backup Slides High-pT Physics at LHC

  34. Measurement at RHIC y=0 RHIC LHC • Future detector upgrades will allow for identified c and b quark measurements • RHIC production spectrum significantly harder than LHC • NOT slowly varying • No longer expect pQCD dRAA/dpT > 0 • Large n requires corrections to naïve Rcb ~ Mc/Mb High-pT Physics at LHC

  35. RHIC c, b RAA pT Dependence • Large increase in n(pT) overcomes reduction in E-loss and makes pQCD dRAA/dpT < 0, as well WH, M. Gyulassy, arXiv:0710.0703 [nucl-th] High-pT Physics at LHC

  36. RHIC Rcb Ratio • Wider distribution of AdS/CFT curves due to large n: increased sensitivity to input parameters • Advantage of RHIC: lower T => higher AdS speed limits pQCD pQCD AdS/CFT AdS/CFT WH, M. Gyulassy, arXiv:0710.0703 [nucl-th] High-pT Physics at LHC

  37. Simultaneous p, e- Suppression A. Adil and I. Vitev, hep-ph/0611109 H. Van Hees, V. Greco, and R. Rapp, Phys. Rev. C73, 034913 (2006) S. Wicks, WH, M. Gyulassy, and M. Djordjevic, nucl-th/0512076 • pQCD is not falsified: • Elastic loss? • Uncertainty in c, b contributions • In-medium fragmentation? • Resonances? • Naïve pQCD => large mass, small loss • But p, h RAA ~ e- RAA! High-pT Physics at LHC

  38. Zooming In • Factor ~2-3 increase in ratio for pQCD • Possible distinction for Rad only vs. Rad+El at low-pT High-pT Physics at LHC

  39. Additional Discerning Power • Consider ratio for ALICE pT reach • Adil-Vitev in-medium fragmentation rapidly approaches, and then broaches, 1 • Does not include partonic energy loss, which will be nonnegligable as ratio goes to unity High-pT Physics at LHC

  40. Consider ratio for ALICE pT reach High-pT Physics at LHC

  41. LHC p Predictions • Our predictions show a significant increase in RAA as a function of pT • This rise is robust over the range of predicted dNg/dy for the LHC that we used • This should be compared to the flat in pT curves of AWS-based energy loss (next slide) • We wish to understand the origin of this difference WH, S. Wicks, M. Gyulassy, M. Djordjevic, in preparation High-pT Physics at LHC

  42. Comparison of LHC p Predictions Curves of ASW-based energy loss are flat in pT (a) (b) A. Dainese, C. Loizides, G. Paic, Eur. Phys. J. C38:461-474 (2005) K. J. Eskola, H. Honkanen, C. A. Salgado, and U. A. Wiedemann, Nucl. Phys. A747:511:529 (2005) High-pT Physics at LHC

  43. Why ASW is Flat • Flat in pT curves result from extreme suppression at the LHC • When probability leakage P(e > 1) is large, the (renormalized or not) distribution becomes insensitive to the details of energy loss • Enormous suppression due to: • Already (nonperturbatively) large suppression at RHIC for ASW • Extrapolation to LHC assumes 7 times RHIC medium densities (using EKRT) • Note: even if LHC is only ~ 2-3 times RHIC, still an immoderate ~ 30-45 • As seen on the previous slide, Vitev predicted a similar rise in RAA(pT) as we do • Vitev used only radiative loss, Prad(e), but assumed fixed path • WHDG similar because elastic and path fluctuations compensate High-pT Physics at LHC

  44. Elastic Can’t be Neglected! M. Mustafa, Phys. Rev. C72:014905 (2005) S. Wicks, WH, M. Gyulassy, and M. Djordjevic, nucl-th/0512076 High-pT Physics at LHC

  45. Elastic Remains Important High-pT Physics at LHC

  46. A Closer Look at PQM • Difficult to draw conclusions on inherent surface bias in PQM from this for three reasons: • No Bjorken expansion • Glue and light quark contributions not disentangled • Plotted against Linput (complicated mapping from Linput to physical distance) A. Dainese, C. Loizides, G. Paic, Eur. Phys. J. C38:461-474 (2005) High-pT Physics at LHC

  47. Direct g: A+A IS Well Understood PHENIX, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 232301 (2005) High-pT Physics at LHC

  48. pT dependence of surface bias Nontrivial a posteriori fixed length dependence More Geometry (not surface emission!) S. A. Bass, et al., arXiv:0808.0908 [nucl-th]. S. Wicks, WH, M. Djordjevic and M. Gyulassy, Nucl. Phys. A784, 426 (2007) High-pT Physics at LHC

More Related