1 / 22

Dynamics of Articulated Robots

Dynamics of Articulated Robots. Rigid Body Dynamics. The following can be derived from first principles using Newton’s laws + rigidity assumption Parameters CM translation x(t) CM velocity v (t) Rotation R(t) Angular velocity w (t) Mass m, local inertia tensor H L.

Download Presentation

Dynamics of Articulated Robots

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Dynamics of Articulated Robots

  2. Rigid Body Dynamics • The following can be derived from first principles using Newton’s laws + rigidity assumption • Parameters • CM translation x(t) • CM velocity v(t) • Rotation R(t) • Angular velocity w(t) • Mass m, local inertia tensor HL

  3. Kinetic energy for rigid body • Rigid body with velocity v, angular velocity w • KE = ½ (m vTv + wT H w) • World-space inertia tensor H = R HL RT T w v H 0 0 m I w v 1/2

  4. Kinetic energy derivatives • KE/v = m v • Force (@CM) f = d/dt (KE/v) = m v’ • KE/w = H w • d/dt H = [w]H – H[w] • Torque t = d/dt (KE/w) = [w] H w + H w’

  5. Summary • f = m v’ • t = [w] H w + H w’

  6. Robot Dynamics • Configuration q, velocity q’  Rn • Generalized forces u  Rm • Joint torques/forces • If m < n we say robot is underactuated • How does u relate to q and q’?

  7. Articulated Robots • Treat each link as a rigid body • Use Langrangian mechanics to determine dynamics of q, q’ as a function of generalized forces u • (Derivation: principle of virtual work)

  8. Lagrangian Mechanics • L(q,q’) = K(q,q’) – P(q) • Lagrangian equations of motion:d/dt L/q’ - L/q = u Kinetic energy Potential energy

  9. Lagrangian Approach • L(q,q’) = K(q,q’) – P(q) • Lagrangian equations of motion:d/dt L/q’ - L/q = u • L/q’ = K/q’ • L/q = K/q - P/q Kinetic energy Potential energy

  10. Kinetic energy for articulated robot • K(q,q’) = Si Ki(q,q’) • Velocity of i’th rigid body • vi = Jit(q) q’ • Angular velocity of i’th rigid body • wi = Jir(q) q’ • Ki = ½ q’T(miJit(q)TJit(q) + Jir(q)THi(q)Jir(q))q’ • K(q,q’) = ½ q’T B(q) q’ Mass matrix

  11. Derivative of K.E. w.r.t q’ • /q’ K(q,q’) = B(q) q’ • d/dt (/q’ K(q,q’)) = B(q) q’’ + d/dt B(q) q’

  12. Derivative of K.E. w.r.t q q’T /q1 B(q) q’ … q’T /qn B(q) q’ • /q K(q,q’) = ½

  13. Potential energy for articulated robot in gravity field • P/q = Si Pi/q • Pi/q = mi (0,0,g)Tvi = mi (0,0,g)TJit(q) q’ • -G(q) Generalized gravity

  14. Putting it all together • d/dt K/q’ - K/q - P/q = u • B(q) q’’ + d/dt B(q) q’ – ½ + G(q) = u q’T /q1 B(q) q’ … q’T /qn B(q) q’

  15. Putting it all together • d/dt K/q’ - K/q - P/q = u • B(q) q’’ + d/dt B(q) q’ – ½ + G(q) = u q’T /q1 B(q) q’ … q’T /qn B(q) q’

  16. Final canonical form • B(q) q’’ + C(q,q’) + G(q) = u Mass matrix Centrifugal/coriolis forces Generalized gravity Generalized forces

  17. Forward/Inverse Dynamics • Given u, find q’’ • q’’ = M(q)-1 (u - C(q,q’) - G(q) ) • Given q,q’,q’’, find u • u = M(q) q’’ + C(q,q’) + G(q)

  18. Newton-Euler Method (Featherstone 1984) • Explicitly solves a linear system for joint constraint forces and accelerations, related via Newton’s equations • Faster forward/inverse dynamics for large chains (O(n) vs O(n3)) • Lagrangian form still mathematically handy

  19. Software • Both Lagrangian dynamics and Newton-Euler methods are implemented in KrisLibrary

  20. Application: Feedforward control • Joint PID loops do not follow joint trajectories accurately • Include feedforward torques to reduce reliance on feedback • Estimate the torques that would compensate for gravity and coriolis forces

  21. Application: Feedforward control • Joint PID loops do not follow joint trajectories accurately • Include feedforward torques to reduce reliance on feedback • Estimate the torques that would compensate for gravity and coriolis forces

  22. Feedforward Torques • Given q,q’,q’’ of trajectory • 1. Estimate M, C, G • 2. Compute u • u = M(q) q’’ + C(q,q’) + G(q) • 3. Add u into joint PID loops

More Related