1 / 19

MORTGAGE FORECLOSURES & PREDATORY LENDING IN ST. CLAIR COUNTY 1996-2000

MORTGAGE FORECLOSURES & PREDATORY LENDING IN ST. CLAIR COUNTY 1996-2000. Assistant Professor Lynne Dearborn East St. Louis Action Research Project University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Study Questions. How prevalent is predatory lending in St. Clair County?

upton-wong
Download Presentation

MORTGAGE FORECLOSURES & PREDATORY LENDING IN ST. CLAIR COUNTY 1996-2000

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MORTGAGE FORECLOSURES & PREDATORY LENDING IN ST. CLAIR COUNTY 1996-2000 Assistant Professor Lynne Dearborn East St. Louis Action Research Project University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

  2. Study Questions • How prevalent is predatory lending in St. Clair County? • Are there specific areas or populations within the county that are particularly vulnerable?

  3. Data Collected • Circuit Clerk’s Foreclosure Files • Assessments and Sales Prices • Tax Stamps and Document Records

  4. Estimated 5-Year Totals Foreclosure Complaints = 2170 Judgements to Foreclose = 1460

  5. 8 Indicators of Abusive Lending 1. Single Premium Credit Insurance 2. Mandatory Arbitration Clause 3. Prepayment Penalties 4. Balloon Payments 5. Interest Rate Spread 6. Adjustable Rate 7. Sale Price Difference 8. High Loan to Value Ratio

  6. Estimated 5-Year Totals Suspect Predatory Loans = 1120 High Loan to Value Loans = 1105

  7. Number of Judgements Increases • ARMs Increase as Percentage of Judgements

  8. ARMs are More Likely in Judgements and Suspect Predatory Loans

  9. Average Difference between Mortgage Interest Rate and T-Bill Rate Increases from 2.14% to 3.43% During a Time Period when Interest Rates were Generally Declining

  10. Among Judgements, the Percentage of ARMs with Interest Rates More than 6% over the T-Bill Rate is Significantly Greater than the Percentage of Fixed Mortgage Rates at more than 6% over the T-Bill Rate

  11. General Statistics Relating to Census Block-Groups • 1. Close to 2/3 of census block-groups in the county (172 out of 263) have seen foreclosure complaints. • 2. Just over 1/2 the census block groups in the county (145 out of 263) have seen judgments to foreclose. • 3. Close to 1/2 the census block groups in county (128 out of 263) have seen suspect loans made. • 4. Close to 1/2 the census block groups in the county (124 out of 263) have seen loans with high loan-to-value ratios.

  12. Geographical Analysis - Complaints Map of Foreclosure Complaints by Census Block Group 1996-2000

  13. Geographical Analysis - Judgements Map of Judgements to Foreclose by Census Block Group 1996-2000

  14. Geographical Analysis - Suspect Loans Map of Suspect Predatory Loans by Census Block Group 1996-2000

  15. Geographical Analysis - High LTV Loans Map of High LTV Loans by Census Block Group 1996-2000

  16. Geographical Analysis - Comparing Municipalities Map of Suspect Loans by Municipality 1996-2000

  17. Geographical Analysis - Comparing Municipalities Map of High LTV Loans by Municipality 1996-2000

  18. Summary • Racial, income, and in some cases age group concentrations figure prominently in the geographic distribution of loans with both predatory characteristics and high LTV ratios. • Individual demographic characteristics highlighted in interviews with individuals who have experienced foreclosure suggest low-income single-mothers are particularly vulnerable to predatory tactics.

  19. Recommendations • Provide alternative sources of sub-prime lending. • Increase the use of available enforcement tools. • Employ caution in the use of Adjustable Rate Mortgages. A more comprehensive description of the study will be available soon at http://www.eslarp.uiuc.edu

More Related