1 / 22

Texas: Self-determination with Consumer Directed Services

National Academy for State Health Policy Reforming State Long-Term Services and Supports through Participant Direction. Texas: Self-determination with Consumer Directed Services. Marc S. Gold Texas Department of Aging and Disability Services October 5, 2010.

upton
Download Presentation

Texas: Self-determination with Consumer Directed Services

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. National Academy for State Health Policy Reforming State Long-Term Services and Supports through Participant Direction Texas: Self-determination with Consumer Directed Services Marc S. Gold Texas Department of Aging and Disability Services October 5, 2010

  2. Consumer Directed Services (CDS) History • 1997: House Bill 2084: pilot model of • participant direction • 1999: Senate Bill 1586; expand CDS option • to Medicaid programs and established a • CDS stakeholder workgroup • 2001: CDS added to the Medicaid waivers • 2004: Consolidation of Human Services • 2010: CDS option in all waivers, state plan • and managed care programs

  3. Long Term Services & Supports Program • Waivers: • Older and Physical Disabilities • Community-based Alternatives • Medically Dependent Children Program • STAR+ (managed care) • Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities • Home and Community-based Services • Deaf-Blind Multiple Disabilities • Community Living Assistance and Support • Services • Texas Home Living • State Plan Programs: Attendant Services • Primary Home Care • Community Attendant Services • (b) attendant services

  4. What is Texas CDS? • Not “cash and counseling” • Mechanism to control hiring of selected • direct service workers and licensed staff • Service budget determined by agency staff • Limited budget flexibility: determine pay • rate within service rate set by state • Texas CDS is not: • Cash option • Service provision by legally liable adults • (spouse/parent) • “Individual goods and services”

  5. Texas 2010 • All individuals, across disabilities • and regardless of age have the option • to use CDS • Statutory Authority • 1915 (c) waivers • 1915 (b) waivers (managed care) • 1915 (j) state plan amendment (DRA • 2005) TX: attendant programs • No screening tool: self-determination

  6. Available Services through CDS • All programs: Personal assistance • services; habilitation and respite • Selected waivers: Nursing and • physical/occupational/speech therapies • Texas Home Living: All services

  7. Support Services to CDS Model • Financial Management Services (FMS) • payroll, deposit taxes and file tax • reports • $202/month in waiver program • $110/month in attendant programs • Support Consultation • Assistance and training: coaching the • individual how to interview/hire • $15.37/hour (from overall budget)

  8. Getting the Word Out • Case managers or service coordinators • provide information about the CDS option • at program enrollment and annually upon • service review • Information includes an overview of the • CDS option, employer responsibilities, FMS • provider responsibilities as well as • benefits and risks of using the CDS option

  9. Individual Responsibilities • Serve as employer • Recruit and hire services provider • Determine the work schedule • Determine the wage rates and benefits • Provide initial and ongoing training • Approve services provider timesheets • Handle conflicts • If necessary, terminate provider

  10. Budget and Spending Flexibility • Budget based on approved service plan • Any budget change must be proceeded by a service plan change • Wages determined within the rate established by the state • Budget allows employers to purchase employer-related supports: advertising costs, fax machine for sending time sheets, background checks and training for attendants (not individual goods/services) • 90% of budget must be allocated to service provider pay and benefits

  11. Utilization: 2008-2010

  12. Factors in Increase Usage • Addition of CDS to waiver program (HCS; • MDCP) • Expansion of managed care to urban areas • within Texas

  13. Population Differences • 49% of participants with related conditions • in CLASS waiver program • 3% of participants with intellectual or • developmental disabilities in HCS waiver • Less than 1% participants with physical • disabilities and those who are aging in CBA • 33% of parents of children with special • medical needs MDCP waiver program

  14. Fee-for-Services vs. Managed Care • Less than 1 percent in fee-for-service programs for individuals who are older or with physical disabilities • Three percent for same population in managed care

  15. Factors Impacting Usage • Elderly too ill to manage self-direction • Lack of informal support to help with self- • direction • Independent case managers versus agency • case managers • Conflict of interest when case management • provided by program provider

  16. Quality Assurance/Improvement • Data collected from the: • Personal Experience Survey • National Core Indicators • Those who use CDS reported they: • required less medical attention • required less support to prevent • disruptive behavior • felt safer in their homes • were more satisfied with their lives • felt less lonely

  17. Cost Effectiveness Studies • 4 studies, however mixed results with • inconclusive data • Trend data indicate: • Utilization of services increased with • CDS • Few hospitalizations and return to • nursing facility

  18. Strengths/Considerations • Strengths • Available to all individuals served by • Texas’ long-term services system • Operates under a single set of • administrative rules; consistency • Considerations • Ties CDS to specific waiver and rule • requirements such as service plan • developments/provider requirements, • case management or service coordination • Limits budget flexibility

  19. Workgroup Recommendations • Develop and implement outreach activities across TX to increase awareness and understanding of the benefits of the CDS • Establish a certification process for CDS Agencies (CDSAs) to improve quality of services and ensure cost-effective oversight • Make workers’ compensation insurance affordable for workers • Create a budget neutral, cross disability, self-determination pilot waiver in at least one rural and one urban site

  20. Future Considerations • Service Responsibility Option • Self-determination Waiver • Addition of individual goods and services • Require certification • Regional “supra” contract role • Increase responsibilities of support advisors

  21. Contact Information Marc S. Gold Director, Promoting Independence Initiative 512.438.2260 marc.gold@dads.state.tx.us www.dads.state.tx.us/business/pi/index.html Elizabeth Jones, Ph.D., CDS Specialist 512.438.4855 elizabeth.jones@dads.state.tx.us

  22. Websites • CDS Option: • http://www.dads.state.tx.us/providers/CDS/ • index.cfm • TX Administrative Code: Title 40, Part 1, Chapter 41: • http://www.dads.state.tx.us/providers.CDS/ • Ch41CDSJan2009.pdf.

More Related