140 likes | 239 Views
Un Partenariat global pour accélérer le progrès vers les OMD grâce à l’Éducation des populations rurales (EPR). A Global Partnership to accelerate progress towards MDGs through Education for Rural People (ERP). ERP is a WSSD partnership bridging:
E N D
Un Partenariat global pour accélérer le progrès vers les OMD grâce à l’Éducation des populations rurales (EPR) A Global Partnership to accelerate progress towards MDGs through Education for Rural People (ERP)
ERP is a WSSD partnership bridging: the agriculture and education sectors efforts WFS and EFA aims and strategies L’EPR est un partenariat du SMDD qui relie: • Les efforts dans les domaines de l’éducation et de l’agriculture • Les objectifs et les stratégies du SMA et de l’EPT
Why ERP ? • WSSD: Only with cross sector collaboration we can ensure imaginative, coherent and integrated initiative to tackle most intractable problems • Isolation is inefficient, leads to competition, and duplication, wasting of valuable resources and to a “blame culture” .
Value added by ERP flagship • A focus on MDGs & PRSPs • A dynamic intersectoral approach to WFS and EFA La valeur ajoutée du partenariat EPR • Une convergence sur les OMD et le Cadre Strategique de Croissance et de la Lutte contre la Pauvrété (CSLP) • Un approche dynamique et inter-sectorielle á SMA et EPT
Main results - cont • New alliances between more than 300 partners (Gov. CSO. IO) • ERP integrated into national RD and EFA policies (Kosovo, China, Venezuela, Mozambique, etc) • Capacity developed at national, regional and international level • Research results incorporated in national policies Les principaux résultats – cont • Nouvelles alliances parmi plus de 300 partenaires (Gov. OSC, OI) • L’EPR intégrée dans les DR nationaux et les politiques de l’EPT (Kosovo, Chine, Vénézuela, Mozambique, etc) • Competences et capacités développée aux niveaux national, régional et international • Résultats des recherches incorporées dans les politiques nationales.
Constraints • Inability to access external resources • Competitiveness among sectors • Intolerance (of other sectors)
Managing the partnership • Light informal coordination mechanism in FAO fostering: • advocacy • information sharing and knowledge management • Capacity building • Global policy making • Technical assistance to global, regional or local initiatives
Managing the partnership FOR THE WORKING GROUPS TO DISCUSS • What can each partner bring to the partnership? • Information • Products • Expertise • Relationships (with donors, policy makers, community groups, media, academia, civil society…) • People ( seconded, volunteers and interns, administrative support • Resources • Common initiatives (such as today's’ one …and …)
Managing the partnership FOR THE WORKING GROUPS TO DISCUSS • What can each partner bring to the ERP partnership: • Local alliances • Local consultations • Local learning and capacity building on ERP • National activities planned together by MOE and MOA
The ERP Challenge: more, differently and better • More investments for rural people • Address high unit costs • Promote compensatory strategies Le défi de l’EPR: plus, différemment et mieux • Plus d’investissements en faveur des populations rurales • Faire face aux coùts unitaires élevés • Promouvoir des stratégies de compensation
The ERP Challenge: more, differently and better • Diversity of situation and needs • Targeted, diversified strategies and supply • Intersectoral collaboration • Partnership: State – Civil Society – Private sector Le défi de l’EPR: plus, différemment et mieux • Reconnaissance de la diversité des situations et des besoins • Diversification des stratégies et provision des services ciblés et diversifiés • Collaboration inter-sectorielle • Partenariat : Etat – Société civile – Secteur privé
We are having success if • ERP is sustainable and self managing in each country • The partnership has an added value in which individual partners gain significant benefits by: • Sharing good experiences • Learning from each other • Collaborating in a competitive world. • Getting political impact and financial support that individual partners would not receive in isolation
Group 1 -Advocacy and coalitions in support of ERP (ADEA, FAR, etc) • Group 2 -3 Trends and modalities in inter-sectoral approaches and collaboration (PRSPs, ONE UN,...) and RP in the context of national, regional and international partnerships, initiatives, organizations (Kossovo, FTI, NEPAD, ...) • Group 4- Committed universities and III education- contribution to ERP, and rural development
Education for rural people key for a sustainable world http://www.fao.org/sd/erp/ L’Education pour les populations rurales: la clé pour un monde durable http://www.fao.org/sd/erp/index_fr.htm