Compiling a Monolingual Dictionary for Native Speakers

1. Compiling a Monolingual Dictionary for Native Speakers Patrick Hanks Formerly chief editor, Current English Dictionaries, Oxford University Press; Editor, Collins English Dictionary; managing editor, Cobuild (1st edition). Ljubljana February 6, 2009

2. Talk Outline • L1 dictionaries and their users • Words and their histories • Research: getting the words in • Macrostructure: the lexical item • Words, multiword expressions, idioms, affixes • Abbreviations? Names? • Microstructure: • Lemma, pronunciation, meaning, use, ... • The future of L1 dictionaries • Print? CD-Rom? On-line? Hypertext links?

3. Typology of L1 English dictionaries • British: • Historical principles: Oxford English Dictionary [multivolume] • Synchronic principles: Collins, Chambers, (N)ODE [each is 1 volume] • American: • Historical principles: Merriam Webster’s Unabridged [multivolume], Merriam Webster’s Collegiate [1 vol.], • Synchronic principles: American Heritage • Australian: Macquarie (synchronic principles)

4. What’s the difference between ‘historical principles’ and ‘synchronic principles’? • Historical principles place the earliest meaning of a word first • camera, noun [Latin camera ‘vaulted room’] 1686. 1. a small room.2. the treasury of the papal curia. 3. a darkened box or room with a screen in it, onto which an image is projected (camera obscura)....4. an apparatus for taking photographs or making films. … • Synchronic principles place the current meaning first. • camera, noun. an apparatus for taking photographs or making films. [from Latin camera ‘small room’] • camera obscura, noun. a darkened box or room with a screen in it, onto which an image is projected. ... [Latin: ‘dark room’]

5. The instability of word meaning • The synchronic/historical distinction affects many words. • field: enclosed land. [Old English feld ‘open country’] • gay: homosexual. [meant ‘cheerful’ until about 1965] • intercourse: sex act. [meant ‘conversation’ until C20] • kind: considerate and friendly. [Old English: ‘noble, well-bred’] • magazine: 1. periodical publication. 2. holder for cartridges on a gun or revolver. [Arabic: ‘storehouse’ ] • sock. [Latin soccus ‘light shoe worn by a comic actor’] • size: dimension, magnitude. [from assizes ‘session of a local law court’: a size loaf was a loaf of court-approved dimensions] • Today’s exploitation may become tomorrow’s norm.

6. Word histories • Modern British and American dictionaries – even dictionaries on synchronic principles – have a C19 model of word history • They tell the semantic development – how each word developed its modern meaning(s) – including changes that took place in the LI – as well as the morphological development of etymons since IE • Also, discuss cognates (not just false friends), semantic equivalents, and the origins of idioms: • English magazine. French magasin • English crane, French grue, Czech jeřáb • kick the bucket

7. Getting the words in (1) • Building on existing dictionaries • Lexicography is accretive • Danger of mindlessly copying errors and out-of-date information • The Oxford reading program: • 150 years of research to find millions of citations • But not a balanced corpus • Directed reading research – specialist areas • Searching corpus data: • low yield for new words • high yield for phraseology, collocation, usage • Trawling the internet. Problems: • sorting the “new words” from the rubbish • many “new words” are in fact multiword expressions • They are hard to find by web crawling programs

8. Getting the words in (2) • Building on existing dictionaries • Lexicography is accretive • Danger of mindlessly copying error s and out-of –date information • How to keep the lexicographers awake? • The Oxford reading program: huge expense • Directed reading research – specialist areas • Searching corpus data: low yield • Trawling the internet. Problems: • sorting the “new words” from the rubbish • many “new words” are in fact multiword expressions

9. Why do people want a dictionary of their native language? • There are no good recent studies of L1 dictionary use in English • Academic studies of dictionary use are mostly of bilingual and foreign learners’ dictionaries: • e.g. Atkins and Varantola (1997) studied dictionary use in translation tasks and language learning, but not native speaker use • L1 and L2 dictionaries are quite different • Foreign learners want to know what every native speaker knows already • Native speakers have a much broader spectrum of needs—peripheral, not central usage

10. Informal feedback from marketing departments (1) • People use an L1 dictionary mainly: • for correct spelling (English is problematic) • In Slovenian, maybe for correct morphology? • for guidance on correct usage and word choice, e.g. • ‘uninterested’ vs. ‘disinterested’, ‘refute’ vs. ‘deny’; ‘bored with’ or ‘bored of’ • Is it wrong to split an infinitive (e.g. ‘to boldly go’) ? • for instant cultural reference information, e.g. • “What’s the scientific name for a thrush?” • “Is your scapula your collarbone or your shoulder blade?” • “What’s the capital of Chile?” • for browsing, e.g. “Why is a madrigal called a madrigal?”

11. Informal feedback from marketing departments (2) • An L1 dictionary is also used: • as a source of information about rare words and senses • “What doesnook-shotten [in Shakespeare] mean? What is a predator, and can you use it to describe a person? Is a penguin a predator? What are chinos? What is an ohm? What is a joule, and why is it so called?” • for word games (e.g Scrabble) : “Is aa an English word?” • People want to have an authoritative inventory of their language, even if (in practice) they never look at it • They also want ‘fun words’ – e.g. cutpurse, mosstrooper, yegg, snakehead, tsotsi, rudeboy, grifter (various criminals) • And ‘new words’ – which provide journalistic copy

12. The role of corpus data • Corpora show how each word is used • providing an essential source of information for collocations and syntagmatics (studied statistically) • a framework, a solid empirical foundation for a dictionary • but don’t stop there! • Other kinds of information must be slotted into this framework, e.g. • Etymologies and word histories • Guidance on ‘correct’ usage • Scientific and technical definitions • Consistency of sets (e.g. ‘all’ the terminology of cricket) • A corpus cannot be the only source for lexical data • Lexicographers reading newspapers, watching TV, note how things are said (the words used), not what is said (content of the message)

13. The dictionary as inventory • An L1 dictionary should contain “all the words in the language” • but is this possible? The lexicon is constantly growing • and “all the meanings of each word” • but word meaning is imprecise and fluid, not fixed • guidance on how each word is used (syntagmatics) • By examples of usage, rather than by abstract formulations in the technical language of linguistics • Dictionaries are for people, not for linguists!

14. Researching lexical items: collecting evidence • Building on existing dictionaries • Lexicography is accretive • Danger of mindlessly copying error s and out-of –date information • How to keep the lexicographers awake? • The Oxford reading program: huge expense • Directed reading research – specialist areas • Searching corpus data: low yield for new words • Trawling the internet. Problems: • sorting the “new words” from the rubbish • Many so-called “new words” are in fact multiword expressions

15. Some 2006 new words: from Macmillan English Dictionary blogosphere, noun. the imaginary place on the Internet where people’s blogs go so that other people can read them and react to them: software that tracks mood swings across the ‘blogosphere’ and pinpoints the events behind them... chav,noun. someone, especially a working-class person who is not well educated, dresses in designer clothes and wears a lot of gold jewellery but whose appearance shows bad taste. • air kiss, career gapper, Chelsea tractor, chick lit, civil partnership, designer baby, green audit, hissy fit, intelligent design

16. Even Homer nods (especially when copying) • dord, n. density. • actually copied from another dictionary “D. or d. density.” • Example from an American dictionary of the 1960s, cited by David Crystal • intercourse, noun. 1. communication or dealings between individuals or groups: everyday social intercourse. 2. short for SEXUAL INTERCOURSE. • NODE (1998, ODE 2005) • Sense 2 is the usual sense of the modern word; it should be the main definition, not a mere cross-reference.

17. Terminology of special fields • Science, technology, sports, pastimes, slang: • How far should an L1 dictionary go in covering these? • strobila, strobilus, strobilation, googly, chav • chav is a coelacanth among slang words: very ancient, but only recently discovered. The etymology is Romany • Native speakers who do not know these words rightly expect to find them in a dictionary. • But a dictionary is not a term bank.

18. L1 dictionary macrostructure • The lexical item • words • multiword expressions • idioms and phrasal verbs • where to put them? E.g. bite the dust – at dust or bite? • prefixes and suffixes; combining forms e.g. un-, -ation, -oholic, brachy-, -algia • abbreviations? • names?

19. Microstructure • Lemma (inflected forms) • Pronunciation • Wordclass and subcategorization • Selectional preferences and phraseology • Syntax and syntagmatics • definitions • Guidance on correct usage • Etymology and word histories

20. The lemma • strong, stronger, strongest • strongly • strength • strengthen • emblazon (but emblazoned is 100 times commoner) • frightened, frightening (forms of the verb, or adjectives in their own right?)

21. Pronunciation • Should a printed LI dictionary text give guidance on pronunciation at all? • More useful in English than in Slovenian? • Use the International Phonetic Alphabet or some sort of spelling-rewrite system? • Why give pronunciations only for headwords? Why not also for inflections? • An electronic product can be multimedia, so hypertext links to a spoken representation seems an obvious answer • But in which dialect?

22. Dictionary definitions What is a word meaning? Does it exist? “A text is a unique deployment of meaningful units, and its particular meaning is not adequately accounted for by any organized concatenation of the fixed meanings of each unit. This is because some aspects of textual meaning arise from the particular combination of choices ...” – J. Sinclair 2004 • Not least because the meaning of each unit is not fixed! • Dictionaries can’t account for everything in the meaning of a text. But they can account for some things. (An elephant is not a toothpick.)

23. Writing definitions of technical terms • Stipulations by scientific committees and other classifying systems • Stipulations, not natural language! • Need both • Examples: second, spider • Interface between the lexicographer and the scientist (the user of the term)

24. technical definitions (1) second, noun. a sixtieth of a minute of time, which as the SI unit of time is defined in terms of the natural periodicity of the radiation of a caesium-133 atom. • informal a very short time: his eyes met Charlotte’s for a second. (N)ODE

25. technical definitions (2) spider: an eight-legged predatory arachnid with an unsegmented body consisting of a fused head and thorax and a rounded abdomen. Spiders have fangs which inject poison into their prey, and most kinds spin webs in which to capture insects. • Order: Araneae, class: Arachnida. (N)ODE

26. Word sketch for ‘spider’ • object_of:1341.5 catch 9153.93 watch 6 eat 43.43 find 8290.89 put 4 see 9 get 8 come 50.33 • subject_of: 1373.0 scuttle 37.86 crawl 46.76 spin 46.02 climb 105.83 bite 35.1 feed 33.65 wait 32.61 live 4202.22 run 6 go 6 come 4 • a_modifier: 2111.8 trap-door 49.24 bird-eating 38.84 tarantula 38.82 jumping 48.64 sedentary 38.11 poisonous 47.61 giant 127.44 hairy 37.2 gigantic 37.19 tiny 8575.4 black 18 huge 3 white 6 great 9 large 6 little 3 small 4 female 44.52 • n_modifier: 1321.3 Insy 142811.4 Winsy 14 bola 49.9 orb 48.66 raft 98.56 fen 57.51 crab 47.05 widow 116.83 wolf 46.72 hunting 45.65 forest 43.23 sea 32.76 house 50.73 • modifies: 158 0.7 mite 179.65 catcher 38.29 monkey 158.18 web 128.03 venom 47.78 crab 57.33 rider 106.71 climb 46.39 silk 55.52 leg 42.64 affair 32.28 plant 3151.89 woman 4 family 3 system 5 • and/or: 2191.8 scorpion 119.62 cockroach 37.94 beetle 8257.85 insect 12 fly 5 caterpillar 57.79 octopus 37.66 boar 57.41 crab 57.25 wolf 67.21 web 77.19 mite 37.03 spider 6126.89 snake 6 bug 36.46 bird 53.55

27. Corpus-based profile for ‘spider’ • Many thousands of species of spiders are known (funnel-web, web-building, orb-weaving, bird-eating, ground-dwelling, giant, huge, large, tiny, poisonous, black widow, camel, redback, trapdoor, wolf, whitetail, crab. tarantula, etc.). • Some species of spiders huntprey. • Spiders bite. • Some species of spiders are poisonous. • Many species of spiders spinwebs, with threads of strongsilk. • Spiders lurk in the centre of their webs. • Spiders control what is going on in their webs. • Spiders have eight legs. • Their legs are thin, hairy, and long in proportion to body size. • Spiders have eight eyes. • Spiders spend a lot of time being motionless. • Spiders’ movement is sudden. • Spiders crawl. • Spiders scuttle. • Spiders are swift and agile. • Spiders can runupwalls. • Many people have a dread of (hate) spiders. • People kill spiders. • English people are much concerned with trying to get spiders out of the bath.

28. The virtues of brevity Avoid verbosity! • Even if in the dictionary of the future space is unlimited, dictionary entries should be brief, concise, and to the point. • Lumping and splitting • Ockham’s razor • Menu-driven hierarchies of information

29. Lexical syntagmatics Convention: • A dictionary can show the relations between typical, normal phraseology and typical, normal meaning, e.g.: • frighten, verb. • Something frightens a person or animal = cause to feel fear • .. frighten someone off /away • .. frighten someone into doing something • .. frighten the children upstairs into bed • .. frighten someone out of their skin/wits • .. frighten the life (living daylight) out of someone

30. Selecting examples of usage • No invented examples! • Intuitions and usage are inverse variables. • Plenty of corpus evidence to choose from. • Beware of distortion through shortening • Choose natural, normal examples, not boundary cases.

31. The need to get on with it! • The lexicon of a language is large. Dictionary compilation is a huge task. • The editor must make policy decisions and everyone must stick to them • There is no time for agonizing. • Anyway, agonizing is often counterproductive. • When compiling, compilers should “do their honest best”. • A system must be set up for spotting obvious errors and accidental infelicities of wording • Lexicographers read and check each other’s work

32. The future of L1 dictionaries • The medium: • Print? CD-Rom? On-line? • On-line dictionaries of the future will be locations that summarize and interface • Menu-driven information hierarchies • The message: • Hypertext links to pre-processed corpus evidence, a grammar, an encyclopedia, other reference sources, other data of all kinds: the dictionary will a) summarize b) typify, and b) interface • Corpus-based syntagmatics (dogs bark, wolves howl; lions roar, cats miaow) • Multimedia (sound, photos, film clips. Smell? taste? touch?) • Links to scientific taxonomies, e.g. Linnaean classification of flora and fauna

33. Conclusions (1) • L1 lexicographers are not linguists • A self-indulgent belief • Linguistics is fatal for good lexicography • Lexicographers should know a bit about linguistics, but they need to know about a lot of other things too • Lexicography is a team game. “Renaissance man” is dead (as far as dictionary writing is concerned) • What are they, then? • Inventory clerks? Public servants? Cultural, social, and literary historians? Creative writers? Hack journalists? • All of these and more. • A lexicographer is a lexicographer!

34. Conclusions (2) • Evidence • Corpus shows word usage, both regular and irregular • Other research is needed for terminology, names, word histories, and attitudes to the ‘correctness’ of controversial expressions • Interpretation • Definitions should explain, not merely define • Authoritative pronouncements must be based on evidence, not merely opinion • But public attitudes to ‘correctness’ need to be reported objectively as well as evaluated • Explain all normal, central uses and meanings • Don’t try to cover all possibilities! • If you do, the language will defeat you, for word meaning and use is infinitely flexible