1 / 1

Introduction

Results (cont.). Results (cont.). Introduction. Table 3. Correlations of AFC and the traits included in the lifetime net merit index*.

Download Presentation

Introduction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Results (cont.) Results (cont.) Introduction Table 3. Correlations of AFC and the traits included in the lifetime net merit index* Heifer rearing costs account for 15 to 20% of the total expense of milk production, and the decline in cow fertility over the last 40 years is well-documented. Genetic selection for younger age at first calving (AFC) may improve profitability and fertility. Table 2. Summary statistics of PTA AFC for active bulls Data • First calvings from January 1, 1997 to present for Brown Swiss (BS), Holstein (HO), and Jersey (JE) • Calving ages between 18 months and 36 months • Sires had to be ≥ 60 months (5 years) old • The final dataset included 40,932 calvings for BS, 8,234,537 HO calvings, and 521,806 JE calvings • Average phenotypic AFC ranged from 735 d for JE to 826 d for BS (Table 1) • Heritability was 0.03 for HO and JE and 0.06 for BS • Average PTA AFC for active bulls ranged from -1.39 for JE to -0.29 for BS (Table 2) • Genetic trend was estimated by regression of sire PTA AFC on birth year, and was slightly negative for all breeds (Figure 1) • Correlations of AFC with net merit were -0.33 for HO, -0.40 for JE, and + 0.09 for BS (Table 3) Model Animal model used to predict variances and PTA: y = hys + a + e y = age at first calving hys = fixed effect of herd-year-season of birth a = random additive genetic effect e = random residual error *Correlations among PTA for bulls with reliabilities of AFC ≥ 0.90 (BS n=15, HO n=1,557 and JE n=126). Figure 1. Sire genetic trend for AFC Conclusions • Genetic differences exist among bulls for AFC • The heritability of AFC is similar to that of conception rate and daughter pregnancy rate • Increasing AFC results in lower yield, lower longevity, and lower lifetime profit • Routine evaluation of AFC is desirable because it provides dairy producers with an additional tool for managing reproduction in their herds Results Table 1. Summary of phenotypic AFC for cows

More Related