110 likes | 176 Views
Sectio n 5.1 Indirect Proofs . Matthew Gronsky Anthony Mercuri And Patrick Haggerty. Introduction. Indirect proofs are proofs that are not in the traditional format of two-column proofs. Indirect proofs are useful when you need to prove a negative. For example;
E N D
Section 5.1 Indirect Proofs Matthew Gronsky Anthony Mercuri And Patrick Haggerty
Introduction Indirect proofs are proofs that are not in the traditional format of two-column proofs. Indirect proofs are useful when you need to prove a negative. For example; does not bisect < ABD.
Procedure • List the possibilities for the conclusion. • Assume the opposite of the desired conclusion is correct. • Write a chain of reasons until you reach an impossibility. This will be a contradiction of either • Given information • A theorem, definition, or other known fact. • State the remaining possibility as the desired conclusion. (Taken from Geometry for Enjoyment and Challenge)
Sample Problems GIVEN: ∆ABC, And D is on but not at the midpoint PROVE: ∆ABD ∆ACD
Either ∆ ABD ∆ACD or ∆ABD ∆ACD Assume ∆ABD ∆ACD therefore, (CPCTC) But this contradicts the given fact that D is on but not at the midpoint . Therefore the assumption is false and it follows that ∆ABD ∆ACD because that is the only other possibility
Practice Problem A Given: ∆ABD with base is a median <BAC <DAC B D C Prove: ∆ ABD is not isosceles
Either ∆ABD is isosceles or ∆ABD is not isosceles Assume ∆ABD is not isosceles. So . <D <B. It is given that ∆ABD with base . Also, is a median. So (If a line that extends from a ∆ vertex is a median then it divides the opp side into 2 segs. Hence, ∆ACD ∆ACB (SAS). <BAC <DAC (CPCTC). But this is impossible b/c it contradicts the given fact that <BAC <DAC. Therefore, the assumption is false and it follows that ∆ABD is not isosceles b/c that is the only other possibility.
Z Practice Problem 2 Y Given: ∆ ZOG with base , is an altitude to , <Z <O Prove: does not bisect G O
Either bisects or does not bisect Assume bisects . Therefore (If a ray bisects a segment, it divides the segment into 2 congruent segments.) It is given that ∆ZOG with base and is an altitude to . So <ZYG and < OYG are right angles (If a line extending from a triangle vertex is an altitude then it forms right angles with the opposite side). <ZYG <OYG (Right <s are congruent). (Reflexive Property). Therefore ∆YOG ∆YZG (SAS). Hence, <Z <O by CPCTC. But this is impossible b/c it contradicts the given fact that <Z <O.
the assumption is false and it follows that does not bisect b/c that is the only other possibility.
Works Cited Indirect Proofs. Golden Plains School Division, 2009. Web. January 17, 2010. Rhoad, Richard. Geometry for Enjoyment and Challenge: New Edition. New York: McDougal Little & Company, 1991.