1 / 31

BYOD: La nube privada y pública en el mismo dispositivo

BYOD: La nube privada y pública en el mismo dispositivo. Carlos V ázquez , Senior Sales Engineer , Iberia. Agenda: 1 . BYOD requires Policy 2. BYOD and HD WLANs 3. The future: 802.11ac. The world today: Wi-Fi is a Right!!. Today . . . And tomorrow . . . At 35,000 ft. Stadiums.

vahe
Download Presentation

BYOD: La nube privada y pública en el mismo dispositivo

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. BYOD: La nubeprivada y pública en el mismodispositivo Carlos Vázquez, Senior Sales Engineer, Iberia

  2. Agenda: 1. BYOD requires Policy 2. BYOD and HD WLANs 3. The future: 802.11ac

  3. The world today: Wi-Fi is a Right!! Today . . . And tomorrow . . . At 35,000 ft Stadiums Airports While hitting the slopes Hotels Restaurants At the beach Grocery Stores Hospitals

  4. Users are Bringing Their Own Applications Source: Gartner, Market Trends Mobile App Stores

  5. Private and Public Cloud on same Device Uncontrolled Minutes to rollout Auto updates Installed by user Many apps per user Controlled by IT Weeks to rollout Local maintenance Touch user’s device Standard apps for all Private Cloud • Under the same Wi-Fi network • On the same mobile device Public Cloud

  6. BYOD requires Policy… but based on what? NAS Device User Application Employee Contractor Visitor Shopper Patient Access Network ClearPass

  7. Where does Clear Pass fit? Same as your RADIUS Access Methods Policy Enforcement Points Policy Decision Points VPN ClearPass Policy Manager AAA Wireless User WLAN Controller Customer’s LAN Wired User Switch Active Directory or LDAP Server SQL Store VPN Concentrator Remote User

  8. Flexible Guest Access ClearPass Policy Manager New Visitor Access Network 3. Sponsor Account enabled, visitor notified via screen, SMS, or email 1. Collect visitor information 2. Sponsor prompted to confirm that guest is valid

  9. Application-Based Policy

  10. What makes Aruba different: Adaptive RF Aruba is the only network to use deep inspection of traffic To optimize and secure the air 7. Application 6. Presentation App Service Reliable 5. Session 4. Transport 3. Network Threat Mobility Fast Secure 2. Data Link 1. Physical

  11. Introducing AppRF™ Technology Applications PEF Lync Citrix Skype FaceTime Box iCloud Actions ARM LowerPriority IncreasePriority Limit Bandwidth ClientMatch Load Balance BlackList

  12. High Performance Video over WLAN better performance for video streaming when compared to an equivalent major competitor WLAN 30% x 20 5GHz 3x3:3 MIMO 40MHz • 6.25Mbps multicast video stream per client • No jitter/delay/pixelation 2.4GHz x 10 Aruba AP-135 • 1Mbps unicast video stream per client • No jitter/delay/pixelation 5GHz x 21

  13. Aruba and MS Lync http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/lync/gg131938

  14. Microsoft deploys Lync in Redmond Campus “The system averaged 16,000 call records over a thirty day period with greater than 96% toll quality, a fifty percent improvement over the legacy network. The network is delivering Lync services as the designers intended, with full fidelity and end-to-end quality of service.” Victoria Poncini, Microsoft’s IT Technology Architect.

  15. 2. BYOD and HD WLANs

  16. Aruba´s High Density WLAN Lab

  17. New ARM 3.0 • ARM 1.0 • “Tune” • Easy channel and power setup • Noise aware • Intelligent scanning • ARM 2.0 • “Influence” • Band steering • Airtime fairness • Multicast optimization • ARM 3.0 • “Control” • Client Match • Directed handover • Traffic balancing

  18. 3 Clients connect to the strongest RF signal causing some APs to be overwhelmed 4 APs are not evenly loaded by client count or throughput Class room with ~50 students 1 Clients connect where they want without taking network conditions into account 2 Often prefer 2.4 GHz which is slower and interference prone 2.4 GHz 5 GHz Individual clients lack information about the entire network and cannot make the best decisions. This results in an inefficient use of spectrum and a negative user experience.

  19. 3 4 5 Break out students SNR drops significantly Highest bandwidth students are operating at the lowest data rate Static students see degraded performance. Dynamic Environment 1 Some students break out to do video research 2 Clients remain stuck to their original AP 2.4 GHz 5 GHz As users move, their client often does not adjust. This results in poor throughput, dropped calls, etc. for the user and his neighbors.

  20. 3 No more slow clients bringing down the network ~50 students with ClientMatch 1 More clients on 5 GHz for better throughput and performance 2 RF utilization and client to AP signal taken into account when balancing 2.4 GHz 5 GHz With knowledge about all of the available APs, their utilization and the clients, ClientMatch optimizes overall network performance for improved scalability and throughput.

  21. 3 High utilization clients are balanced across APs to limit bottlenecks Keeping up with a dynamic environment 1 Some students break out to do video research 2 ClientMatch adjusts to changing utilization 2.4 GHz 5 GHz ClientMatch continuously updates connections to optimize the network. Clients are steered as network conditions change including high bandwidth utilization and signal changes.

  22. Maintains application performance in high density areas (e.g., lecture halls) with scheduled channel access time Works across heterogeneous clients (Broadcom, Intel, Atheros, etc.) Works across heterogeneous OSs (XP, Vista, Mac OS, etc.) Implemented at RF PHY and Layers 4-7 Provides fair access in the presence of mixed-mode clients in both 2.4GHz and 5GHz spectrums, and across 11b/g/n and 11a/n clients Airtime Fairness

  23. 802.11ac

  24. 802.11ac Channels (FCC) UNII I and UNII II 2x 80 MHz 4x 40 MHz 8x 20 MHz Channel Band Edge 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 Band Edge Freq(MHz) 5150 5180 5200 5220 5240 5260 5280 5300 5320 5350 UNII II extended 3x 80 MHz 6x 40 MHz 12x 20 MHz Channel Band Edge Band Edge 100 104 108 112 116 120 124 128 132 140 144 136 5470 5500 5520 5540 5560 5580 5600 5620 5640 5660 5680 5700 5725 Freq(MHz) 5720 US UNII III 1x 80 MHz 2x 40 MHz 5x 20 MHz Band Edge Band Edge 149 153 157 161 165 Channel 5725 5745 5765 5785 5805 5825 Freq(MHz) 5850

  25. Phases of 802.11ac • Phase 1: Gigabit Speeds (CY’2013) • 5GHz only • Up to 80MHz channels in Phase 1 (160MHz in Phase 2) • Up to 3 spatial streams in Phase 1 (8 in Phase 2) Phase 2: Multi-User MIMO (CY’2014) Increased Capacity with simultaneous transmit to multiple receivers 1-stream 802.11ac 5GHz AP radio 2-stream 802.11ac 1-stream 802.11ac 4-stream 802.11ac AP

  26. When to Move to 802.11ac?

  27. The Campus Architecture for the Next 10 Years Hi-speed Wi-Fi WiredAccess Mobility Core Data Center AirWave ClearPass MobilityControllers MobilityAccessSwitches 802.11n -or- 802.11ac

  28. Airheads Community Aruba Certifications Practical, Not Academic ACMP ACMX ACDX ACMA MVP 3141 5926 5358 G. Marconi ACSP AWMP AIRWAVE CLEARPASS CCxx MCxx CWxx MVP Airheads Social • Home of the Mobility Experts MVP Program For The Most Influential Unified community for social networking, events, training, certification and recognition 3141 5358 G. Marconi since 2011 Airheads Events Engineers Only http://community.arubanetworks.com

  29. 2012 Gartner Magic Quadrant: Wired & Wireless LAN Access Recognized as one of only three in the leaders quadrant for combined Wired + Wireless MQ

  30. WLAN Market Share Enterprise Switch/Server/Appliance Revenue Rolling Four-quarter CYQ2’11 through CYQ1’12, ending March 30, 2012. Source: Dell’Oro Research

  31. Thanks!

More Related