810 likes | 1.04k Views
Employee Satisfaction: What do we do with the data?. Mary Tellis-Nayak, RN, MSN, MPH VP Quality Initiatives My InnerView mary@myinnerview.com. Objectives. The participant will be able to: Identify three issues which staff say cause them to recommend a nursing home as a good place to work
E N D
Employee Satisfaction:What do we do with the data? Mary Tellis-Nayak, RN, MSN, MPH VP Quality Initiatives My InnerView mary@myinnerview.com
Objectives The participant will be able to: • Identify three issues which staff say cause them to recommend a nursing home as a good place to work • Describe the relationship between the quality of the workplace and 3 other measures • Discuss what must be done with employee satisfaction results • List 2 things a leader can do with the results of staff satisfaction surveys
Our Mission To provide long-term care leaders evidence-based management tools to better achieve their organization’s goals
My InnerView Nationwide • 5,600+ providers in all 50 states and District of Columbia use our tools • Largest satisfaction benchmark database in long-term care • Recommended by: • 3 national associations • 32 state associations
Providers will commit to focus on at least 3 of 8 measurable goals
OPERATIONAL/PROCESS GOALS: Establishing individual targets for improving quality Assessing resident and family satisfaction with the quality of care Increasing staff retention Improving consistent assignment of nursing home staff, so that residents regularly receive care from the same caregivers CLINICAL GOALS: Reducing high risk pressure ulcers Reducing use of daily physical restraints Improving pain management for longer term nursing home residents Improving pain management for short stay, post-acute nursing home residents
National Employee SatisfactionSurvey Results2006Nearly 107,000 responses
First nationwide report 1,933nursing homes in 49 statesand D.C. participated in 2006 NOTE: Alaska not included
FIGURE 2a Employee’s age
FIGURE 2b Employee’s job category
FIGURE 2d Length of employment
FIGURE 1 SATISFIED NURSING HOME WORKERS BY CATEGORY Based on the percent of total weighted respondents who rated their overall satisfaction as “excellent” or “good” in each job category
Survey items: Quality of orientation Quality of in-service education Quality of resident-related training Quality of family-related training Comparison of pay Care (concern) of supervisor Appreciation of supervisor Communication by supervisor Attentiveness of management Care (concern) of management Safety of workplace Adequacy of equipment/supplies Sense of accomplishment Quality of teamwork Fairness of evaluations Respectfulness of staff Assistance with job stress Staff-to-staff communication
FACTORS THAT DRIVE WORKFORCE RECOMMENDATION Ranked correlations (p < 05) between employee workplace recommendation and employee satisfaction items
TABLE 5 FACTORS THAT DRIVE WORKFORCE RECOMMENDATION (continued) Ranked correlations (p < 05) between employee workplace recommendation and employee satisfaction items
TABLE 6 PRIORITY ITEMS FOR NURSING STAFF Ranked by average scores and correlations with workplace recommendation
FIGURE 3 Recommendation for care
FIGURE 3 Does not total 100% due to rounding Recommendation for job
FIGURE 3 Overall satisfaction
TABLE 1 TRAINING May not total 100% due to rounding
TABLE 2 WORK ENVIRONMENT May not total 100% due to rounding
TABLE 3 SUPERVISION May not total 100% due to rounding
TABLE 4 MANAGEMENT May not total 100% due to rounding
What about employee data? What do we know today?
Key Performance Drivers higher family satisfaction lower nursing assistant turnover higher employee satisfaction higher family satisfaction
Key Performance Drivers higher satisfaction among families and employees higher occupancy rates
Key Performance Drivers higher satisfaction among families and employees better clinical outcomes related to falls, pressure ulcers and catheters
Improve care outcomes Improve relationships HRDecrease nurse absenteeism Decrease nurse turnover Decrease CNA turnover Resident/Family Satisfaction FinancialIncrease occupancy SUMMARY OF RELATIONSHIPS Staff Satisfaction
Facilities with higher family satisfaction have better work environments Mean = 68.0 EMPLOYEE ENVIRONMENT SCORE (%) < 54% 54% to 58% 58% to 64% > 64% FAMILY SATISFACTION
Facilities with higher family satisfaction have better employee training Mean = 57.1 EMPLOYEE TRAINING SCORE (%) < 54% 54% to 58% 58% to 64% > 64% FAMILY SATISFACTION
Facilities with higher family satisfaction have better supervision Mean = 72.2 EMPLOYEE SUPERVISION SCORE (%) < 54% 54% to 58% 58% to 64% > 64% FAMILY SATISFACTION
Facilities with higher family satisfaction have better management Mean = 66.5 EMPLOYEE MANAGEMENT SCORE (%) < 54% 54% to 58% 58% to 64% > 64% FAMILY SATISFACTION
Facilities with higher employee satisfaction have: • More residents without falls • More residents without pressure ulcers • More residents without acquired catheters • Less nurse turnover • More nurse stability • Less CNA absenteeism • Less nurse absenteeism • Higher occupancy
Quality of leadershipand quality of the workplace: The interface • CNAs speak up! • A 2004 study • 156 nursing facilities in the Southeast • 3,579 CNAs, 6,502 families surveyed • November 2004
Indicators ofquality of workplace • Pay compared to other nursing homes • Safety of workplace • Adequate equipment and supplies to do your job well • Work allows you to make a difference in people's lives • Co-workers work as a team • Fair performance evaluations • Staff are respectful of residents • Helps you get to deal with job stress • Communication between shifts
Quality of leaders produce a quality workplace Rating by 6,305 CNAs in 156 Nursing Facilities:4 percentile ranked groups, 2004
As Staff are Treated So will the elders be treated.