60 likes | 158 Views
#. ¶. Vlad Avrigeanu. Contents. Why this. note ?. [. KOWI. E-questionnaire,. ]. June. 2001. 1. FOREWORD:. 2. (RO). R&D. results. work conditions. “. excellence”. vs. vs. 3. ENLARGEMENT:. inside. outside. actual EC (?). (. / ). 4. Final remarks. ¶.
E N D
# ¶ Vlad Avrigeanu Contents Why this note ? [ KOWI E-questionnaire, ] June 2001 1. FOREWORD: 2. (RO) R&D results work conditions “ excellence” vs. vs. 3. ENLARGEMENT: inside outside actual EC (?) ( / ) 4. Final remarks ¶ “Horia Hulubei” National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering (IFIN-HH), P.O.Box MG-6, 76900 Bucharest, Romania # E-address: vavrig@ifin.nipne.ro URL: http://tandem.nipne.ro/~index.html Real Enlargement and Extended ERA ? Workshop - The Integration in the European Research Area, Bucharest, October 26, 2002
2. (RO) results work conditions vs. vs. ‘excellence’ R&D Sample: "Inter-Disciplinary Research and Applications based on Nuclear and Atomic Physics" EC/FP5/INCO2 “Support for Centres of Excellence” (IDRANAP) project, IFIN-HH, Bucharest-Magurele, 2001-2003. · excellence: results over ~40 years [former work conditions below worldwide standard] failure: working conditions · (Institute of Atomic Physics, Bucharest- Magurele) - e.g., no journal in 2002 within IAP library! 180 € (PhD student) - 250 € (Assoc. Prof.) [partly/delayed] - salary/month: ~ (3-6 months) IDRANAP-guests working stages : mainly less efficient formal / (PhD student) – (post-doc)] [visitors different appraisal: 1000 € 2400 € should be firstly replenished by the EC support of the IDRANAP project Ø [ actual contract: - only visits support - IDRANAP-staff visits: 1 month /year/ workpackage] Workshop - The Integration in the European Research Area, Bucharest, October 26, 2002
2. (RO) R&D results work conditions vs. vs. ‘excellence’ (cont.) Future best : e.g., EC/FP5/INCO A1 " " Strategic action on training and excellence (18.01.2002) A training period in a Member State (<2 years) v Possibility to bring back* the experience acquired (<1 year) v *Possible increased efficiency: reversal ratio of support periods: 1/2 , 2/4 , … Most promising researchers from candidate countries: Workshop - The Integration in the European Research Area, Bucharest, October 26, 2002
3. ENLARGEMENT (inside) /outside actual EC (?) : · at CEEC institutes Preservation/development of knowledge/capabilities · CEEC efforts Integrate into existing EC/JRC programs and EU networks · EC/JRC activities Expansion of by additional manpower and networking · EC/JRC CEEC manpower Cost effectiveness: bringing together facilities & ! Possible failure if in the meantime (CEEC) RO institutes will collapse ERA including candidate countries Enlargement actions at EC/ CEEC institutes: well related/known in real time (currently updated CORDIS lists) Aims: Workshop - The Integration in the European Research Area, Bucharest, October 26, 2002
Workshop - The Integration in the European Research Area, Bucharest, October 26, 2002
4. Final remarks (cont.) RO(EAST)- EUROPEAN PRESENT EUROPEAN “TRANSITION ACTUAL PROGRESS QUALITY MANAGEMENT” RESULTS FACTOR Natural resources Huge Irrational exploit (E) E No progress 4p Dispersion Environment damage Market Large Low life-level E Low economy progress R&D Low cost Lacking work- No RO-ERA (Human resources) conditions effectiveness Workshop - The Integration in the European Research Area, Bucharest, October 26, 2002