1 / 25

Complexity, Modelling & Plants

Complexity, Modelling & Plants. Teodor Ghetiu NSC Group, CoSMoS project. Supervisors: Dr Fiona Polack and Dr Jim Bown 1 1 University of Abertay Dundee. Complexity. Etymology: 14 th century Latin expression complexus ‘ embracing or comprehending several elements‘

vange
Download Presentation

Complexity, Modelling & Plants

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Complexity, Modelling & Plants Teodor Ghetiu NSC Group, CoSMoS project Supervisors: Dr Fiona Polack and Dr Jim Bown1 1University of Abertay Dundee

  2. Complexity • Etymology: 14th century Latin expression complexus • ‘embracing or comprehending several elements‘ • ‘plaited together, interwoven’ [Simpson1989] • Types [Manson2001]: • Algorithmic: information theory • Deterministic: chaos and catastrophe theory • Aggregate: complexity theory, complex systems • Definitions: 32 definitions of complexity [Lloyd2006]

  3. Complex Systems • Definitions: • A whole that is greater than the sum of its parts [Aristotle350BC] • Cilliers finds 10 properties [Cilliers1998]: • Large number of elements • Rich, non-linear, local and recurrentinteractions • Have history • React based on local knowledge. • Usually open, far-from-equilibrium • A system defined by: agent-based, dynamic, heterogeneous, feedback, organisation, emergence [Santa Fe CSCS]

  4. Complex Systems • Features - Hierarchy theory [Simon1962] • Scale: have multiple layers of description • Emergence: high-level behaviours based on low-level interactions • Environment: influenced by and influencing their environment • Paradox • Natural (complex) systems: robust, adaptive, self-* properties • Complexity: ‘A word problem and not a word solution’[Morin1990] • Challenge: to improve the way we study and construct such systems • Scientifically engineer, model, simulate, analyse

  5. Modelling • Modelling motivations [Grim1999] • Pragmatic: tools for solving problems • Paradigmatic: tools that facilitate a better understanding • Paradigms • Mathematical modelling • Equation Based Modelling (EBM) • Computational modelling • Cellular Automata (CA)‏ • Agent Based Modelling (ABM) • Individual Based Modelling (IBM) • Process Oriented Modelling (POM)

  6. Mathematical Modelling • Lotka-Volterra predator-prey model [Lotka1925] • prey's numbers: own growth minus rate at which it is preyed upon • predator population: own growth minus natural death.

  7. Mathematical modelling • Benefits • Integrated view on populations [Kaiser1979] • Explicit mathematical treatment, analytic truths [Bryden2006] • Shortcomings • Limits understanding of system properties [Kaiser1979] • Scalability problems [Huston1988] • Strong assumptions [Bullock1994] • Centralised systems, physical laws dynamics [Parunak1998]

  8. Cellular Automata • Large sets of identical, finite-state automata [VonNeumann1966] • Simple but capable of generating complex behaviours • Benefits [Hogeweg1988] • Extendability • Observability • Spatial representation [Durrett1993] • Shortcomings • Synchrony • Space-orientedness Conway’s Game of Life

  9. Agent-Based Modelling • Extending CA’s • Autonomy • Reactivity • Proactivity • Sociability Source www.esourceagent.com

  10. Agent-Based Modelling • Benefits • Prediction of outcomes under novel conditions [Kaiser1979] • Simpler and more accurate than mathematical models [Huston1988] • Relaxed assumptions [Bullock1994] • Localised, distributed, information processing dynamics [Parunak1998] • Integrating many levels of description [Bousquet2004] • Shortcomings • Performance, providing synthetic truths [Bryden2006] • Oriented on social systems [Andrews2008] • Time, space and component-quantity aspects [Andrews2008] • Dependence on MAS platforms [Sudeikat2005]

  11. Process Oriented Modelling • Benefits [Ritson2007] • Finer granularity • Plasticity, dynamism • Simulations at larger scales • Mapping to natural processes • Shortcomings • Lower granularity: harder to model macro-entities • Recent interdisciplinary tool Process composition[Ritson2007]

  12. Process Oriented Modelling • Occoids simulation [Sampson2008] • POP based • Continuous space • Scalable architecture • Large scale simulations

  13. Scientific Modelling • Models and simulations are generally used in [Andrews2008]: • ‘Improving scientific understanding of (natural) systems’ • ‘Constructing or exploring alternative realities’ • Scientific use raises issues of: • Realism, Precision and Generality trade-off [Holling1964] • Analysis [Braitenberg1984] • Transparency [DiPaolo2000] • Validity [Sargent1987] • ‘Scientific validity, like engineering validity, means that it must be possible to demonstrate, with evidence, how models express the scientific realities’ [Andrews 2008]

  14. Scientific Modelling • Paradox • Objective: to model complex systems • Means: complexity features not addressed thoroughly • Questions: • How to construct (engineer) complex systems? • How to validate their behaviour?

  15. Methodologies • Sargent’s process for developing simulation models [Sargent1981]

  16. Methodologies • The CoSMoS process [Garnett2008]

  17. Plant ecologies

  18. Plant ecologies • Ecology: • ‘Scientific study of the interactions between organisms and their environment’ [Begon2006] • Ecology’s Holy Grail: • General rules relating environment conditions, species traits and community composition [Lavorel2002; Reineking2006] • Plant ecologies are complex systems [Huston1988] • Scale: Individual, patch, population, community, ecosystem • Emergence: Patterns emerge from processes[Wu1994] • Environment: Direct interdependence [Fornara2008]

  19. Plant ecology [Reineking2006] Modelling ecologies • Mathematical models • Individual Based Models • Simple representations: • [Arii2006], [Sebert-Cuvillier2007] • homogeneous populations • non-spatial • Detailed representations: • [Wu2007], [Evers2007] • Complicated, Composite models

  20. Modelling ecologies • Traits as building blocks of individual [Tilman2000] • Addressing the “Holy Grail” • Time and space heterogeneity matters • [Reineking2006]:24 common traits, 4 species specific, spatial model • Intra and interspecific variation combined • [Bown2007a]: 12 traits, spatial • “Individuals that are too similar cannot coexist” • Importance of diversity at the individual scale • [Bown2007b]: community productivity related to individual traits and environment

  21. Summary • Complexity and Complex Systems • Approaches to modelling complex systems • Scientific validation • Plant ecologies

  22. References 1 • [Andrews 2008] Andrews, P., Polack, F., Sampson, A., Timmis, J., Scott, Coles, (2008), Simulating biology: towards understanding what the simulation shows, CoSMoS workshop 2008 • [Arii2006] Arii, K., Parrott, L. (2006) – Examining the colonization process of exotic species varying in competitive abilities using a cellular automaton model, Ecological Modelling, Vol. 199, No. 3., pp. 219-228. • [Aristotle350BC] Aristotle, Metaphysics, volume book H (VIII). 350 BC., Translation fromW. D. Ross, Aristotle’s metaphysics, 2 vols, Oxford University Press, 1924 • [Begon2006] Begon, M.; Townsend, C. R., Harper, J. L. (2006). Ecology: From individuals to ecosystems. (4th ed.), Blackwell. • [Bousquet2004] F Bousquet, C Le Page, Multi-agent simulations and ecosystem management: a review, Ecological Modelling, Vol. 176, No. 3-4. (1 September 2004), pp. 313-332. • [Bown 2007a] Bown, L., Pachepsky, E., Eberst, A., Bausenwein, U., Millard, P., Squire, R., Crawford, J., Consequences of intraspecific variation for the structure and function of ecological communities Part 1: Linking diversity and function, Ecological Modelling, Vol. 207, No. 2-4. (10 October 2007), pp. 264-276. • [Bown 2007b] Bown, L., Pachepsky, E., Eberst, A., Bausenwein, U., Millard, P., Squire, R., Crawford, J., Consequences of intraspecific variation for the structure and function of ecological communities Part 2: Linking diversity and function, Ecological Modelling, Vol. 207, No. 2-4. (10 October 2007), pp. 277-285. • [Braitenberg1984] Braitenberg V (1984) Vehicles, Experiments in Synthetic Psychology. The MIT Press. • [Bryden2006] Bryden, J., Noble, J. (2006), Computational modelling, explicit mathematical treatments and scientific explanation, Artificial Life X: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Artificial Life, pp. 520-526. • [Cilliers 1998] Cilliers (1998), Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding Complex Systems • [DiPaolo2000] Di Paolo, E., Noble, J., Bullock, S., Simulation models as opaque thought experiments, Seventh International Conference on Artificial Life (2000), pp. 497-506. • [Durrett1993] Durette, The importance of being discrete (and spatial), Theoretical population biology, vol 46, 363-394 • [Evers2007] – J Evers, J Vos, C Fournier, B Andrieu, M Chelle, P Struik, An architectural model of spring wheat: Evaluation of the effects of population density and shading on model parameterization and performance , Ecological Modelling, Vol. 200, No. 3-4. (24 January 2007), pp. 308-320 • [Fornara2008] Fornara, Tilman, Plant functional composition influences rates of soil carbon and nitrogen accumulation, Journal of Ecology, Vol. 96, No. 2. (2008), pp. 314-322.

  23. References 2 • [Garnett2008] Garnett, P., Stepney, S., Leyser, O., Towards an Executable Model of Auxin Transport Canalisation, CoSMoS Workshop 2008 • [Grim1999] Grimm, V., Ten years of individual-based modelling in ecology: what have we learned and what could we learn in the future?, Ecological Modelling, Vol. 115, No. 2-3. (15 February 1999), pp. 129-148. • [Hogeweg1988] Hogeweg, P. Cellular automata as a paradigm for ecological modeling, Appl. Math. Comput., Vol. 27, No. 1. (1988), pp. 81-100. • [Holling1964] The Analysis of Complex Population Processes, Can. Entomol., 96, 335-347 • [Huston1988] Huston, M., DeAngelis, D., Post, W., 1988. New computer models unify ecological theory. BioScience 38, 682-691 • [Kaiser1979] Kaiser, H., 1979, The dynamics of population as result of the properties of individual animals, Fortschr. Zool, 25., 109-136 • [Manson2001] Manson, S. (2001), Simplifying complexity: a review of complexity theory, Geoforum, Vol. 32, No. 3., pp. 405-414. • [Lavorel2002] Lavorel, S., Garnier. E (2002), Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail, Functional Ecology, Vol. 16, No. 5., pp. 545-556. • [Lloyd, S. 2006] Lloyd, S, (2006) Programming the Universe: From the Big Bang to Quantum Computers, Knopf • [Lotka1925] Lotka, A. J. 1925. Elements of physical biology. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins Co. • [Manson2001] Manson, S., Simplifying complexity: a review of complexity theory, Geoforum, Vol. 32, No. 3. (August 2001), pp. 405-414. • [Marks2006] Marks, C, Lechowicz, M., A holistic tree seedling model for the investigation of functional trait diversity, Ecological Modelling, Vol. 193, No. 3-4. (15 March 2006), pp. 141-181. • [Morin1990] Morin, E. (1990), Introduction a la Pensee Complexe, (Paris, ESF) • [Parunak1998] Parunak Van Dyke, Savit, R., Riolo, R.L., (1998), Agent-Based Modeling vs. Equation-Based Modeling: A Case Study and Users’ Guide, Multi-Agent Systems and Agent-Based Simulation, pp. 10-25

  24. References 3 • [Polack2005b] Polack, F., Stepney, S. (2005), Emergent properties do not refine • [Polack2005a] Polack F, (2005) An Architecture for Modelling Emergence in CA-Like Systems, • [Reineking2006] B Reineking, M Veste, C Wissel, A Huth, (2006), Environmental variability and allocation trade-offs maintain species diversity in a process-based model of succulent plant communities, Ecological Modelling, Vol. 199, No. 4., pp. 486-504 • [Ritson2007] A Process-Oriented Architecture for Complex System Modelling, Concurrent Systems Engineering, Vol. 65 (July 2007), pp. 249-266. • [Sampson2008] Adam T. Sampson, John Markus Bjørndalen and Paul S. Andrews, Birds on the Wall: Distributing a Process-Oriented Simulation, CEC 2009, awaiting publication • [Santa Fe CSCS] Santa Fe Center for Study of Complex Systems • [Sargent1987] Sargent, R.G. (1987), An overview of verification and validation of simulation models, pp. 33-39 • [Sebert-Cuvillier2007] E Sebert-Cuvillier, F Paccaut, O Chabrerie, P Endels, O Goubet, G Decocq, – Local population dynamics of an invasive tree species with a complex life-history cycle: A stochastic matrix model, Ecological Modelling, Vol. 201, No. 2. (24 February 2007), pp. 127-143. • [Simon1962] Simon, H.A., The architecture of complexity, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, Vol. 106 (1962), pp. 467-482. • [Simpson1989] Simpson, J. et al (1989/2005) Oxford English Dictionary Online (2ndedn) [Electronic resource] (Oxford, Oxford University Press)‏ • [Sommerville2006] Sommerville, I., (2006), Software Engineering • [Squire1990] Squire, G.R., 1990. The Physiology of Tropical Crop Production., CAB International. • [Stepney2005] Stepney, S., Polack, F, Turner, H. (2005), Engineering Emergence, Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems, 89-97 • [Sudeikat2005] Sudeikat, J., Braubach, L., Pokahr, A., Lamersdorf, W., Evaluation of Agent–Oriented Software Methodologies – Examination of the Gap Between Modeling and Platform, Agent-Oriented Software Engineering V (2005), pp. 126-141.

  25. References 4 • [Tilman2000] Tilman,D., Causes, consequences and ethics of biodiversity.,Nature 405, 208–211. • [VonNeumann1966] J. Von Neumann, Theory of Selfreproducing Automata (edited and completed by A. W. Burks), Univ. of Illinois Press, 1966, 388 pp • [Wu1994] J Wu, SA Levin, A spatial patch dynamic modeling approach to pattern and process in an annual grassland, Ecological monographs, Vol. 64, No. 4. (1994), pp. 447-464. • [Wu2007] Wu, J. (2006), – SPACSYS: Integration of a 3D root architecture component to carbon, nitrogen and water cycling—Model description, Ecological Modelling, Vol. 200, No. 3-4. (24 January 2007), pp. 343-359. Any questions?

More Related