1 / 11

Controls Lab (2 nd Week) ‏

Controls Lab (2 nd Week) ‏. Objectives cont. Qualitatively observe the effects of the P, I, and D gains. Test the performance of the previously developed P, PD, and PID position controllers on a brushless DC motor. Adjust the PID gain to improve system performance. Post-laboratory work:

varana
Download Presentation

Controls Lab (2 nd Week) ‏

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ME 4053: Controls Controls Lab (2nd Week)‏ Objectives cont. • Qualitatively observe the effects of the P, I, and D gains. • Test the performance of the previously developed P, PD, and PID position controllers on a brushless DC motor. • Adjust the PID gain to improve system performance. • Post-laboratory work: • Compare the empirical performance of the various controllers to each other and to the simulated performance

  2. ME 4053: Controls Apparatus • PC • Quanser Data Acquisition • Amplifier • Motor and Flywheel • Encoder

  3. ME 4053: Controls R(s)‏  E(s)‏ V(s)‏ (s)‏ C(s) = (s)‏ GS GP  Background – PID Performance Motor Transfer function (Position output)‏ PID controller transfer function Feedback control block diagram Figure 7. Control Feedback Block Diagram

  4. ME 4053: Controls Procedure: Qualitative Observations 1. Use “ControlsQualitative.mdl” as shown on Figure 5. 3. Specify gains (Kp,Ki,Kd) for P controller. 4. Build model, Connect to Target, and hit Start (play) 5. For each controller turn the flywheel with your hand: (1) quickly, (2) slowly, and (3) turn and hold in position. 6. What aspect is the restoring force sensitive to? Record your observations in your lab notebook. 7. Repeat for I and D controllers.

  5. ME 4053: Controls Figure 5. SIMULINK Model for Qualitative Observations

  6. ME 4053: Controls Procedure: PID Controller Performance 1. Open Control2.mdl Set constants according to TA instructions 2. Set Kp, Ki, and Kd to the values you calculated for each of the controllers. 3. Build the model, Connect to Target, hit Start (play) 4.Plot the results and save as a figure file 5. Repeat for the PD and PID controllers.

  7. ME 4053: Controls 30 Pulse Generator Constant Block Diagram to Initiate Position Control of Motor VALUES ASSIGNED IN Procedure! From : Simulink : Source (use time based)‏ From : Simulink : Source Parameters Parameters Amplitude: Constant Value : Period : Pulse width : Phase Delay : Figure 8. SIMULINK Model used for Position Control of DC Motor

  8. ME 4053: Controls HIL READ ENCODER HIL WRITE ANALOG Encoder Input Analog Output 25s -K- s+25 Transfer Fcn Gain 0 Constant Sum Simulink and Quanser Blocks From : Quanser Library: Quanser Consulting MQ3 Series From : Quanser Library : Quanser Consulting MQ3 Series (leave parameters as default) (leave parameters as default) From : Simulink : Math Parameters Gain : 1/2000 From : Simulink : Source Parameters From : Simulink : Continuous Constant Value : 0 Parameters Numerator : [25 0] From : Simulink : Math Denominator : [1 25] Parameters List of signs : |++ List of signs : |+++ Figure 9. SIMULINK and Quansar Blocks Used in Position Control

  9. ME 4053: Controls Max. Overshoot 2% Settling time Procedure: PID Controller Performance 2 SCORE-Change • Open M Files. • Measure the maximum overshoot, the 2% settling time, and the steady-state error for each graph (where applicable) and record the information in Table 1. See Figure 4 for an example. • Calculate the “score” for the performance of the controller. • S=Omax x tsettle if steady state error is less than or equal to 0.5% • Adjust the gains of the best PID controller to improve the performance of the controller. Record the gains and the scores for each attempt in Table 1. Figure 10. Example measured quantities: settling time and max overshoot.

  10. ME 4053: Controls Non-Linear Simulink Model Verification: • Build the following Non-Linear Model to compare to experimental results. • The Transfer Fcn2 on the right is really just (Km / (Tm*s^2 + s)). • To Run your simulation, make sure to go to Simulation, then Configuration Parameters, and run Ode5, with a step size of 0.005. This will make your simulation run much quicker. Feel free to vary these values to make a higher resolution plot. • Slight modification to this model will give a linear version – to be tested as well. Which model works better? See Procedure Pulse Generator See Procedure Figure 11: Non-Linear Model

  11. ME 4053: Controls Controller Kp (units) Ki (units) Kd (units) Max Overshoot (%)‏ Settling Time (s)‏ Steady-State Error (%) Score Ess<=0.5% Pth Pexp PDth PDexp PIDth n=n1 PIDexp n=n1 PIDth n=n2 PIDexp n=n2 PIDth n=n3 PIDexp n=n3 PIDadj PIDadj PIDadj Controller Performance Results Table 4. Simulation and experimental performance results for various controllers.

More Related