370 likes | 501 Views
Lepton Pair Production Accompanied by Giant Dipole Resonance at RHIC and LHC. M. C. Güçlü and M. Y. Şengül İstanbul Technical University . Particle production from E M Fields. * Lepton- pair production * Beam Lifetime ( ele c tron capture and nuclear dissociation )
E N D
Lepton Pair Production Accompanied by Giant Dipole Resonance at RHIC and LHC M. C. Güçlü and M. Y. Şengül İstanbul Technical University Winter Park - Colorado
Particle production from EMFields * Lepton-pair production * Beam Lifetime (electroncapture and nuclear dissociation) * Detector background * Impact parameter dependence * Test of QED at high fields 31/03/ 2006
Collisions of Heavy Ions Winter Park - Colorado
Particle production from EMFields Large number of free lepton-pair production Winter Park - Colorado
Particle production from EMFields Bound-free electron– positron pair production) Winter Park - Colorado
Particle production from EMFields Nuclear dissociation (Giant Dipole Resonance) Winter Park - Colorado
Collision Parameters : Winter Park - Colorado
QED Lagrangian : Electromagnetic four vector potential Electromagnetic field tensor Winter Park - Colorado
Lepton-Pair Production Semi Classical Action : Free Lagrangian : Interaction Lagrangian : Winter Park - Colorado
Total Cross Section for Free Pair Production Winter Park - Colorado
Scalar part of EM Fields in momentum space of moving heavy ions; Amplitude Tkq relates the intermediate-photon lines to the outgoing-fermion lines Winter Park - Colorado
Free electron-positron pair production SPS , γ=10, Au + Au , σ=140 barn RHIC, γ=100, Au + Au , σ=36 kbarn LHC, γ=3400, Pb + Pb , σ=227 kbarn Winter Park - Colorado
Electron Capture Process Winter Park - Colorado
Positron Wave-Function is the distortion (correction term) due to the large charge of the ion. Winter Park - Colorado
Distorted wave-functionfor the captured-electron Winter Park - Colorado
Using the positron and the captured electron wave-functions, direct term of the Feynman diagram can be written as: Winter Park - Colorado
Having the amplitudes for the direct and crossed diagram, the cross section for BFPP is; Winter Park - Colorado
Total Cross Section for Bound-Free Pair Production Impact parameter dependence probability for Bound-Free Pair Production Winter Park - Colorado
Bound- free electron-positron pair production RHIC, γ=100, Au + Au , σ=83 barn LHC, γ=3400, Au + Au , σ=161 barn Pb + Pb, σ=206 barn Winter Park - Colorado
FIG.2: BFPP cross sections for two different systems as functions of the nuclear charge Z [8]. Winter Park - Colorado
FIG.3: BFPP cross sections for two different systems (Au+Au-dashed line and Pb+Pb-solid line) as functions of the [8]. Winter Park - Colorado
FIG.4:The differential cross section as function of the transverse momentum of the produced positrons [8]. Winter Park - Colorado
FIG.5: The differential cross section as function of the longitudinal momentum of the produced positrons [8]. Winter Park - Colorado
FIG.6: The differential cross section as function of the energy of the produced positrons [8] . Winter Park - Colorado
FIG.7: The differential cross section is shown as function of the rapidity [8]. Winter Park - Colorado
What about experiments at SOLENOIDAL TRACKER ( STAR ) ? RHIC: Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider Energy =100 GeV/nucleon Au + Au collisions Winter Park - Colorado
Cross Section of electron-positron pairs accompanied by nuclear dissociation Giant Dipole Resonance Winter Park - Colorado
The total cross section of electron-positron pair production with giant dipole resonance the probability of electron-positron pair production the probability of a simultaneous nuclear excitation as a function of impact parameter[9]. Winter Park - Colorado
Kinematic restrictions at STAR experiment Rapidity: Invariant mass: Transverse momentum : Adams J. At al. Phys. Rev. A 63:031902 (2004) Winter Park - Colorado
Results: Şengül, M. Y., Güçlü, M. C., and Fritzsche, S., 2009, Phys. Rev. A 80, 042711 Winter Park - Colorado
BOUND-FREE ELECTRON-POSITRON PAIR PRODUCTION with GIANT DIPOLE RESONANCE the probability of electron-positron pair production the probability of a simultaneous nuclear excitation as a function of impact parameter
INTEGRATED CROSS SECTIONS FOR GOLD-GOLD COLLISIONS AT RHIC ENERGIES AND FOR LEAD-LEAD COLLISIONS AT LHC ENERGIES FOR FREE AND BOUND-FREE PAIR PRODUCTION
Şengul, M. Y., and Güçlü, M. C., 2011, Phys. Rev. C ,83,014902. FIG.8: The probability of positron pair production with (a) gold beams at RHIC and (b) lead beams at the LHC as a function of b with XnXn (dashed line) and 1n1n (dotted line) and without nuclear excitation [11]. Winter Park - Colorado
FIG.9: The differential cross section as function of energy of the produced positrons is shown in the graph (a) for RHIC and (b) for LHC. And the differential cross section is shown as function of the longitudinal momentum of the produced positrons in the graph (a) for RHIC and (b) for LHC [11]. Winter Park - Colorado
FIG.10: The differential cross section as function of transverse momentum of the produced positrons is shown in the graph (a) for RHIC and (b) for LHC. And the differential cross section is shown as function of the rapidity of the produced positrons in the graph (a) for RHIC and (b) for LHC [11]. Winter Park - Colorado
CONCLUSIONS: 1. We have obtained impact parameter dependence of free-free and bound-free electron-positron pair production cross section by using the semi-classical two photonmethod. 2. Our calculations agree well with the other calculations shown at references. 3. We have also obtained cross sections as a function of rapidity, transverse momentum and longitudinal momentum of produced positrons and compered with the STAR experiment. 4. We can repeat the similar calculation for the FAIR energies. 5. Can we use this method to calculate the production of other particles such as mesons, heavy leptons, may be Higgs particles ? Winter Park - Colorado
REFERENCES: 1) C.A. Bertulani and G. Baur, Phys. Rep. 163, 299 (1988). 2) M.J. Rhoades-Brown, C. Bottcher and M.R. Strayer, Phys. Rev. A 40, 2831 (1989). 3) A.J. Baltz, M.J. Rhoades-Brown and J. Weneser, Phys. Rev. A 50, 4842 (1994). 4) C.A. Bertulani and D. Dolci, Nucl. Phys. A 683, 635(2001). 5) V.B.Berestetskii, E.M. Lifshitz and L.P. Pitaevskii, Relativistic Quantum Field Theory (Pergamon Press, NewYork, 1979). 6) J. Eichler and W.E. Meyerhof, Relativistic Atomic Collisions (Academic Press, California, 1995). 7) H. Meier, Z. Halabuka, K. Hencken, D. Trautmann and G. Baur, Phys. Rev. A 63, 032713 (2001). 8)Şengül, M. Y., Güçlü, M. C., and Fritzsche, S., 2009, Phys. Rev. A 80, 042711. 9) K. Hencken, G. Baur, D. Trautmann, Phys. Rev. C 69, 054902 (2004). 10) M.C. Güçlü, M.Y. Şengül, Progress in Part. and Nucl. Phys. 59, 383 (2007). 11)Şengul, M. Y., and Güçlü, M. C., 2011, Phys. Rev. C ,83,014902. Winter Park - Colorado