720 likes | 748 Views
Learn about School-Wide Positive Behavior Support features, practices, and systems for creating a positive school culture. Understand guiding principles, evaluation criteria, and effective responses to problem behavior. Discover the science behind behavior and violence prevention strategies.
E N D
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Overview George Sugai & Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut October 7, 2008 www.pbis.org www.cber.org www.swis.org George.sugai@uconn.edu
8 SWPBS is about….
PURPOSE Provide brief overview of features, practices & systems of positive school culture for EVERYONE in school
SW-PBS Logic! Successful individual student behavior support is linked to host environments or school climates that are effective, efficient, relevant, & durable for all students (Zins & Ponti, 1990)
9 Guiding Principles • Data • Academic & behavior success • Outcomes • Research-validated practices • Instructional approach • Prevention • Integration • Culture & context • Continuum of behavior support • School-wide for all • Evaluate • Team
2 Worries & Ineffective Responses to Problem Behavior • Get Tough (practices) • Train-&-Hope (systems)
Worry #1“Teaching” by Getting Tough Runyon: “I hate this f____ing school, & you’re a dumbf_____.” Teacher: “That is disrespectful language. I’m sending you to the office so you’ll learn never to say those words again….starting now!”
Immediate & seductive solution….”Get Tough!” • Clamp down & increase monitoring • Re-re-re-review rules • Extend continuum & consistency of consequences • Establish “bottom line” ...Predictable individual response
Reactive responses are predictable…. When we experience aversive situation, we want select interventions that produce immediate relief • Remove student • Remove ourselves • Modify physical environment • Assign responsibility for change to student &/or others
When behavior doesn’t improve, we “Get Tougher!” • Zero tolerance policies • Increased surveillance • Increased suspension & expulsion • In-service training by expert • Alternative programming …..Predictable systems response!
Erroneous assumption that student… • Is inherently “bad” • Will learn more appropriate behavior through increased use of “aversives” • Will be better tomorrow…….
But….false sense of safety/security! • Fosters environments of control • Triggers & reinforces antisocial behavior • Shifts accountability away from school • Devalues child-adult relationship • Weakens relationship between academic & social behavior programming
Science of behavior has taught us that students…. • Are NOT born with “bad behaviors” • Do NOT learn when presented contingent aversive consequences ……..Do learn better ways of behaving by being taught directly & receiving positive feedback
K VIOLENCE PREVENTION • Surgeon General’s Report on Youth Violence (2001) • Coordinated Social Emotional & Learning (Greenberg et al., 2003) • Center for Study & Prevention of Violence (2006) • White House Conference on School Violence (2006) • Positive, predictable school-wide climate • High rates of academic & social success • Formal social skills instruction • Positive active supervision & reinforcement • Positive adult role models • Multi-component, multi-year school-family-community effort
12 K SWPBS Practices School-wide Classroom • Smallest # • Evidence-based • Biggest, durable effect Family Non-classroom Student
36 School-wide • Leadership team • Behavior purpose statement • Set of positive expectations & behaviors • Procedures for teaching SW & classroom-wide expected behavior • Continuum of procedures for encouraging expected behavior • Continuum of procedures for discouraging rule violations • Procedures for on-going data-based monitoring & evaluation
69 Non-classroom • Positive expectations & routines taught & encouraged • Active supervision by all staff • Scan, move, interact • Precorrections & reminders • Positive reinforcement
78 Classroom • Classroom-wide positive expectations taught & encouraged • Teaching classroom routines & cuestaught & encouraged • Ratio of 6-8 positive to 1 negative adult-student interaction • Active supervision • Redirections for minor, infrequent behavior errors • Frequent precorrections for chronic errors • Effective academic instruction & curriculum
GH • Individual Student • Behavioral competence at school & district levels • Function-based behavior support planning • Team- & data-based decision making • Comprehensive person-centered planning & wraparound processes • Targeted social skills & self-management instruction • Individualized instructional & curricular accommodations
Family • Continuum of positive behavior support for all families • Frequent, regular positive contacts, communications, & acknowledgements • Formal & active participation & involvement as equal partner • Access to system of integrated school & community resources
PBS Systems Implementation Logic Visibility PBS Implementation Blueprint www.pbis.org Funding Political Support Leadership Team Active & Integrated Coordination Training Evaluation Coaching Local School Teams/Demonstrations
Development “Map” • 2+ years of team training • Annual “booster” events • Coaching/facilitator support @ school & district levels • Regular self-assessment & evaluation data • Develoment of local/district leadership teams • State/region & Center on PBIS for coordination & TA
Role of “Coaching” • Liaison between school teams & PBS leadership team • Local facilitation of process • Local resource for data-based decision making
Integrated Elements Supporting Social Competence & Academic Achievement 10-11 OUTCOMES Supporting Decision Making Supporting Staff Behavior DATA SYSTEMS PRACTICES Supporting Student Behavior
Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT FEW ~5% Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior ~15% SOME Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings ALL ~80% of Students 15-17
Academic Systems Behavioral Systems • Intensive, Individual Interventions • Individual Students • Assessment-based • High Intensity • Intensive, Individual Interventions • Individual Students • Assessment-based • Intense, durable procedures • Targeted Group Interventions • Some students (at-risk) • High efficiency • Rapid response • Targeted Group Interventions • Some students (at-risk) • High efficiency • Rapid response • Universal Interventions • All students • Preventive, proactive • Universal Interventions • All settings, all students • Preventive, proactive Designing School-Wide Systems for Student Success 1-5% 1-5% 5-10% 5-10% 80-90% 80-90%
18-19 Response to Intervention RtI
16 RTI Continuum of Support for ALL Few Some All Dec 7, 2007
26-28 Team GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS: “Getting Started” Agreements Data-based Action Plan Evaluation Implementation
37/A STEP 1 - Establish Team Membership • Representative of demographics of school and community • 1-2 individuals with behavior/classroom management competence • Administrator active member • Schedule for presenting to whole staff at least monthly • Schedule for team meetings at least monthly • Integration with other behavior related initiatives and programs • Appropriate priority relative to school and district goals • Rules and agreements established regarding voting, confidentiality and privacy, conflict/problem solving, record-keeping, etc. • Schedule for annual self-assessments • EBS Self-Assessment Survey • Review Office Discipline Referrals • Benchmarks of Quality • School-wide Evaluation Tool • Coaching support (school and/or district/region)
Team-led Process 37 Non-Teaching Meetings Family Behavioral Capacity Priority & Status Representation Specialized Support Administrator Team Community Data-based Decision Making Administrator Student Teaching Communications Start with Team that “Works.”
B Working Smarter
22-25 ESTABLISHING A CONTINUUM of SWPBS • TERTIARY PREVENTION • Function-based support • Wraparound/PCP • Special Education Audit Identify existing practices by tier Specify outcome for each effort Evaluate implementation accuracy & outcome effectiveness Eliminate/integrate based on outcomes Establish decision rules (RtI) ~5% ~15% • SECONDARY PREVENTION • Check in/out • Targeted social skills instruction • Peer-based supports • Social skills club • PRIMARY PREVENTION • Teach & encourage positive SW expectations • Proactive SW discipline • Effective instruction • Parent engagement ~80% of Students
STEP 2 – Develop Behavior Purpose Statement 43 • Positively stated • 2-3 sentences in length • Supportive of academic achievement • Contextually/culturally appropriate (e.g., age, level, language) • Comprehensive in scope (school-wide – ALL students, staff, and settings) • Agreement by >80% faculty and staff • Communicated to stakeholders (e.g., families, community members, district administrators) • Included in school publications (e.g., handbook, posters, newsletters)
3-4 Year Commitment Top 3 School- Wide Initiatives 3-Tiered Prevention Logic Agreements & Supports Coaching & Facilitation Administrative Participation Dedicated Resources & Time
Sample Behavior Statements Ex. 1 G. Ikuma School is a community of learners and teachers. We are here to learn, grow, and become good citizens. Ex. 2 At Abrigato School, we treat each other with respect, take responsibility for our learning, and strive for a safe and positive school for all!
Self-Assessment Efficient Systems of Data Management Existing Discipline Data Data-based Action Plan Team-based Decision Making Multiple Systems Evidence- Based Practices SWIS
Office Discipline Referrals • Definition • Kid-Teacher-Administrator interaction • Underestimation of actual behavior • Improving usefulness & value • Clear, mutually exclusive, exhaustive definitions • Distinction between office v. classroom managed • Continuum of behavior support • Positive school-wide foundations • W/in school comparisons