1 / 11

Benchmarking among PES from an experimental project to a regular procedure

Benchmarking among PES from an experimental project to a regular procedure. Introduction Vienna, March 24, 2010, Gudrun Nachtschatt Peter Oberbichler Marius Wilk. Who takes part/since when?.

vea
Download Presentation

Benchmarking among PES from an experimental project to a regular procedure

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Benchmarking among PESfrom an experimental project to a regular procedure Introduction Vienna, March 24, 2010, Gudrun Nachtschatt Peter Oberbichler Marius Wilk

  2. Who takes part/since when? … the working group took up ist meetings in 2002 and has continued since then with financial support by the European Commission … in 2002 with 5 PES members (AMS-AT, AMS-SE, BA, CWI, VDAB) … In 2009 15 (16) PES members (AT, Actiris, VDAB, HR, DE, FIN, FR, HU, IR, NL, LI, LT, SK, SI, SE, CH) … in 2010 ??? … Project leader AMS-AT supported by a Coordination Group and a team of consultants (Synthesis Research)

  3. … providing a shared modular data base on PES-performance … comparing how the performance of participating PES evolves over time (and circumstances) … exchanging good practices desigend to enhance performance What is the working group all about….. 2

  4. … is a useful tool to support the modernisation of PES … is a starting point for mutual learning … widens our horizons … first of all raises questions … focuses on the identification and discussion of „Good Practice“ in strategic areas … will be linked to Mutual Learning in the new programme „PES to PES Dialogue“ shared view: Benchmarking… 3

  5. Q 1 transition to employment Q 2 (Q2a) transition to employment before unemployment lasts long Q 3 transition to employment after participating in training measures Q 4 transparency of the labour market Q 5 filling vacancies with variations Q 6 satisfaction of jobseekers Q 7 satisfaction of employers (Q 8) impact of the recession (under construction) Measuring performance: in which way? 4

  6. We have defined … POPs for population data and … VACs for vacancy data … indicators are a relation between 2 POPs or 2 VACs … concepts: unemployed, registered, employed, to take up a job etc. with different options … 5 context variables: EU-unemploment rate, turnover of unemployed, workload in relation to clients/inhabitants, expenditure for ALMP Measuring performance: in which way? 5

  7. … we do not just compare mere figures of different PES … data base is coherent; measurement biases are expliciteley taken into account in the benchmarking process … context and background are taken into account … dynamic comparison (of PES specific „time path“) becomes more important than static comparison („cross section“ benchmarking for a single year) Comparing PES-performance Does it make sense? 6

  8. … be generalists … be well informed about strategies of their organisation … have good knowledge on which kind of data is available in their PES … have access to those persons in their PES who are responsible for improvement, reforms etc. … have specialists in the background for support on data, assessment of good practice etc. Participants should…. (1) 7

  9. … participate in the working group (2 x year) … deliver figures directly to the database … document the options chosen … document their measurement procedures … deliver information to the background paper on context and tasks ... analyse their performance … inform the group on reforms and strategic discussions … present good practices Participants should….(2) 8

  10. … engage in discussions on good practices and reforms … be linked to their own managment … engage in informing their own PES … present reports to their managment … prepare and initiate study visits … follow up the impact in their organisation the difficult part……. Participants should…(3) 9

  11. Conditions of participation … …the benchmarking will be funded by the EC ? …national contributions will be limited to working time ? …participation in the workshops and discussions …provision of data and all kinds of requested information … strong commitment of the whole PES … agreement that no figures are published !!!

More Related