1 / 28

James Duck Communications Alliance

Communications Alliance Overview and update AusNOG1, Sydney, Australia, 15 November 2007. . James Duck Communications Alliance. Communications Alliance. . Created from a merger of ACIF and SPAN:

vea
Download Presentation

James Duck Communications Alliance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Communications Alliance Overview and update AusNOG1, Sydney, Australia, 15 November 2007  James Duck Communications Alliance

  2. Communications Alliance  Created from a merger of ACIF and SPAN: “Communications Alliance was formed in 2006 to provide a unified voice for the Australian communications industry and to lead it into the next generation of converging networks, technologies and services.” A company resourced by its members Not a government body, nor a lobby group http://commsalliance.com.au

  3. Sample of CA Activities  Develop industry positions on policy Seminars, Forums, Roundtables Compliance Project basedWorking Groups/Committees Advisory Groups

  4. Sample of CA Topics  End user / Consumer premium services, accessibility, priority assistance, universal service, life threatening calls, etc. Customer Equipment Standards for phones, modems, filters, PBXs, etc. Networks, Operations ADSL(2+), VDSL, ordering, provisioning, numbering, emergency calls, law enforcement, infrastructure deployment, portability, etc.

  5. General trends  Next Generation / Emerging Services Transition from legacy to IP-based networks and services Services and applications may be decoupled from or integrated with networks Types of services High interactivity – voice/video calls/conferencing Lower interactivity – streaming video, file transfers So … what to focus on?

  6. What to focus on?  High impact Voice and video Networks and Services High sensitivity Sensitive to delay Sensitive to variability Two related topics emerged…

  7. IP Network Quality of Service  Define a default set of traffic classes Include delay, jitter and loss performance Packet marking and handling Align with international activity Produce related test documents Between User-Network Interfaces More information on Friday morning

  8. VoIP Quality of Service  Provide a measure of VoIP quality in a usable format e.g. ITU-T/ETSI E-model Consider Network IP QoS service classes Align with international activity Consider interworking with existing voice networks e.g. PSTN/ISDN. Assess requirements related to transcoding. Produce related test documents. Mouth to ear

  9. What is “Quality of Service”?  ITU-T “SANCHO” database ...http://www.itu.int/sancho/ Returns 20 answers Includes “dynamic” QoS and “extended” QoS What about “Quality of Experience” (QoE)? ITU held a two and half day“Workshop on "End-to-End QoE/QoS"”http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/worksem/qos/200606/programme.html MIT Communications Futures Programhttp://cfp.mit.edu/resources/index.html White paper on Inter-provider QoS SANCHO = “ITU-T Sector Abbreviations and defiNitions for a teleCommunications tHesaurus Oriented database”

  10. VoIP QoS  Based on: E model (ITU-T Rec. G.107) and R value (ITU-T Rec. G.108) Other options: Mean Opinion Score (MOS) (ITU-T Rec. P.800) arguably subjective, expensive, time consuming, inconvenient. Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Quality (PESQ) (ITU-T Rec. P.862) does not address conversational speech factors such as delay, signal level, echo, impairment.

  11. Factors affecting VoIP QoS  Major Factors affecting VoIP QoS: Delay Distortion e.g. codec choice Echo Loss / level plan Other factors include: Noise level e.g. room noise Advantage e.g. mobility, remote access Sidetone

  12. R Value from ITU-T G.108  R = Ro – Is – Id – Ie-eff + A, where: Ro = Signal to noise Is = combination of all impairments Id = impairments caused by delay Ie-eff = impairments caused by low bit rate codecs A = Advantage

  13. Transmission Rating (R) limits for voice services (1)

  14. Transmission Rating (R) limits for voice services (2)

  15. Impact of delay on QoS

  16. Impact of distortion / compression on R

  17. Impact of echo on R

  18. Impact of packet loss on R

  19. Codec choice and codec negotiation  Each codec has advantages and disadvantages: encoding via a frame codec (e.g. G.729) can introduce delay waveform codecs (e.g. G.711) require more bandwidth Include G.711 (A-law) as an available codec to ensure interoperability. Use packet loss concealment in conjunction with waveform codecs (e.g. G.711). Use RFC 3264 for codec negotiation between end points

  20. Codec choice - example  Waveform/Frame codecs require more/less bandwidth – example for 20ms sample: G.711 at 64kbps, IPv4: 200 bytes including 40 byte header 92 kbps over Ethernet G.729a at 8kbps, IPv4: 60 bytes including 40 byte header 37 kbps over Ethernet 8:1 ratio excluding header 2.5:1 ratio including header

  21. Bandwidth per voice calls with standard IP header(5% additional bandwidth allowed for RTCP packets) 

  22. Transcoding  Transcoding/Tandeming - successive encoding by different/same codecs Reduce and preferably eliminate it Support the G.711 (A-law) codec to avoid: transcoding (distortion) or Inability of endpoints to negotiate a mutually agreeable codec (i.e. call failure). Preferably no enforced transcoding on call gateway(s) at a point of interconnection should avoid transcoding between CELP codecs (e.g. G.729) or between CELP and ADPCM (G.726/G.722) codecs.

  23. Transport scenarios  Single Carrier IP Access and Core networks TDM access and core, IP access network Two Carriers TDM access and core, IP core and access. TDM Access & IP Core, IP Access Three Carriers IP Access, TDM Core, IP Access

  24. Other variables  Transport combinations Pure IP TDM to IP, IP to TDM, IP-TDM-IP IP-TDM-Mobile Access speeds Test types Design, Operational, Fault Equipment Analogue phone + ATA/IAD IP handset, DECT phone behind ATA, WiFi LAN segment

  25. VoIP QoS Status  Quality of Service parameters for Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) services Industry Guideline (CA G634:2007)published end October 2007http://commsalliance.com.au/documents/guidelines VoIP QoS Testing Arrangements Guideline (CA G635:2007) at ballot Complements IP Network QoS activity Next steps

  26. Other Activities – VoIP Working Group  technical, regulatory and consumer protection components of a voice service Fact sheets & guides for providers, end users Liaison with government e.g. ACMA and DCITA Interconnection subgroup Fault handling/restoration and customer support

  27. Possible Technical Activities  Interconnecting SIP services e.g. number formats (E.164, NSN, 0+NSN, ENUM) minimum codec set. Consistent approach to services e.g. how to handle DTMF tones on an IVR An interconnection model for IP based networks Define/adopt common technical interfaces, processes for interception IP Location Information Participation invited/welcome

  28. Contacts  W: http://commsalliance.com.au E: info@commsalliance.com.au T: +61 2 9959 9111 F: +61 2 9954 6136 Level 9, 32 Walker St, North Sydney P.O. Box 444, Milsons Point, NSW 1565

More Related