290 likes | 383 Views
A new dawn for electricity?. Unpacking the role of changing EU and national governance TENTATIVE... Måns Nilsson, Stockholm Environment Institute w contributions from Lars J Nilsson, Lunds Universitet. Study Purpose.
E N D
A new dawn for electricity? Unpacking the role of changing EU and national governance TENTATIVE... Måns Nilsson, Stockholm Environment Institute w contributions from Lars J Nilsson, Lunds Universitet
Study Purpose • To understand the role of EU and domestic policy in on-going developments in the energy production sector* in Sweden.
A change in orientation? The first question • To what extent and in what ways can we identify a reorientation towards electricity in the current development of the Swedish energy sector?
Investment boom • Current pipeline: • CHP forecast 13,2 TWH in 2007 up to 17,5 TWH in 2010. there are extensive existing plans for more CHP, both from biomass and waste incineration. (STEM, 2008) • Wind power forecast: • 1,4 TWH in 2007 and going up to 3,4 TWh in 2010 (STEM, 2008) • Plans add up to 300 billion SEK over 10 years (Swedish Energy)
Strong interest in Swedish export potential towards EU • Total 185 TWh • 100 TWh renewable • We ”import” more and more of the continental electricity prices (source Profu)
Electricity seen as solution to transport sector climate / mobility dilemma in Sweden • Political concerns on the sustainability and large-scale potential for liquid biofuels (Börjesson, Nilsson et al, 2008) • Plug in hybrids – 7 TWh per year (5% of total) takes us all the way to present climate targets in transport sector (Elforsk, 2008).
Heat Pumps More positive treatment as RES in EU proposal
Reduced interest in heating? • Efforts into more efficient houses leading to demand decrease • STEM forecasts stable or slightly downward trend in heating consumption up to 2010
Something in the air? • Bo Källstrand, former head of Swedenergy, sees: “ a change of attitude – electricity used to be the bad guy, now it is often seen as an opportunity for climate-efficient energy), and the future roll of electricity as the saviour of the transport-climate problem” (Interview)
New signals from politicians • Policies supporting CHP developments • Extension of certificate systems continue to drive prices up • Extension of nuclear capacity in present reactors • Statements and positions changing - rhetoric about bad electricity is gone • However Mr A Borg still enjoys raising electricity taxation...
Yes, there does seem to be an increasingly positive view on, and outlook for, electricity!How to explain this reorientation? • 2nd and 3rd Research Questions: • To what extent has EU policy governed the sector’s reorientation and to what extent is it a result of national political changes? • Through what mechanisms do EU and national policies affect the sector’s reorientation?
The basic framework • European policy • National policy • External factors Outcome in ”field” (incl. Investments etc) • Governance Mechanisms • Regulatory standard setting • Market-based governance Cognitive-normative governance
EU policy -climate and energy package National policy Taxation Permitting Certificates R&D etc Mechanisms -regulatory -market-based -cognitive-normative External factors -oil prices, -economic growth Reorientation of field -investment -positions -analysis
EU policies – Climate & Energy Package • CO2: -20% to 2020 • ETS sectors -21% from 2005 EU wide (35% av Swedish emissions; power&heat, refineries, coal, steel, minerals, paper&pulp • Non-trading sector: -17% from 2005 for Sweden (-10% EU wide) (65% av Swedish emissions; housing, transport, waste, agriculture, some industries Domestic policies – Certificates
EU climate and energy package requires new investments in electricity • The RES target requires 25 TWh new wind, CHP or hydro • ETS increases electricity prices – strengthen incentives to invest • And: grid enhancements, green certificate extensions, concession easening, enhanced hydro
MARKAL results on 202020 (Profu) • Virtually all new power will be renewable • Sweden will become big exporter • ETS increases price, RES decreases it • Demand will first continue to go up and then go down (but when?) • Nuclear only feasible after 2030 (replacing the old ones)
Heat constrained by 202020? (MARKAL)Reference case 202020 case Efficiency targets constrains use, heat pumps are pushed in.
Regulatory standard setting • Changes in permitting procedure • Energy efficiency standards • Instructions to Vattenfall
Cognitive-normative governance • RD&D funding and partnerships • Climate commitment strongly integrated in energy sector • Nuclear deliberations changing at EU and national levels • Renewed interest in broad debate eg BASEL, Krafttag.nu: (Resvik, Svenskt Näringsliv) • Sweden’s last ”weapon”... (Leif Johansson, CH Svanberg mfl DN debatt 25/10 • Other political signal