1 / 16

Richard Reed Anita Bilos Sara Wilkinson Karl Werner-Schulte

A Comparison of International Rating Tools 16th Annual E uropean R eal E state S ociety C onference 24 - 27 June 2009 Stockholm. Richard Reed Anita Bilos Sara Wilkinson Karl Werner-Schulte

verna
Download Presentation

Richard Reed Anita Bilos Sara Wilkinson Karl Werner-Schulte

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Comparison of International Rating Tools16th Annual European Real Estate Society Conference24 - 27 June 2009 Stockholm Richard Reed Anita Bilos Sara Wilkinson Karl Werner-Schulte Deakin University IRE|BS University RegensburgAustralia Germany

  2. Overview International rating tools The need for global rating tools The development of rating tools from an international perspective An international comparison of BREEAM, LEED, Green Star, CASBEE and DGNB Difficulties with comparing rating tools Conclusion and further research

  3. Figure 1. Complex System of International Rating Tools Source: IRE|BS

  4. Figure 2. Countrieswith Established or Emerging Rating Tools Source: IRE|BS

  5. Figure 3. Countries withVarious Rating Tool Development Levels Source: IRE|BS

  6. Figure 4. LEED and BREEAM based Rating Tools Source: IRE|BS

  7. Figure 5. Countries with Rating Tools only accepted by WGBC Source: IRE|BS

  8. Figure 6. Timeline of the Developmentof Rating Tools in Different Countries Source: IRE|BS

  9. Table 1. Main Rating Tools – ‘A Greener Profession’ (2007) Source: RICS 2007

  10. Table 2. Existing RatingTools Source: IRE|BS

  11. Figure 1. Complex System of International Rating Tools

  12. Table 4. Issue weighting comparison table Source: BRE2008 & DGNB

  13. Table 5. A Broad Comparison of Four Rating Tools Source: BRE2008 modified by Authors

  14. Table 6. A Broad Comparison of Four Rating Tools Source: Kings Sturge 2009, modified by Authors

  15. Global set of ‘benchmark’ parameters are established for rating tools Individual characteristics of each country are considered e.g. water (flooding vs. drought) Include all buildings, not just new buildings Further research is conducted to remove confusion between rating tools Conclusion and further research

  16. contact Richard Reed Anita Bilos richard.reed@deakin.edu.au anita.bilos@irebs.de Deakin University IRE|BSAustralia Germany

More Related