1 / 43

RTPA RCTF

Statewide Local Streets & Roads Needs Assessment City of San Buenaventura Public Works Department Engineering and Operations Division January 25, 2010. RTPA RCTF. The Need for a Statewide Study. California’s local streets and road system reaching a point of crisis

veta
Download Presentation

RTPA RCTF

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Statewide Local Streets & Roads Needs Assessment City of San BuenaventuraPublic Works DepartmentEngineering and Operations DivisionJanuary 25, 2010 RTPA RCTF

  2. The Need for a Statewide Study • California’s local streets and road system reaching a point of crisis • Every trip begins and ends at City and County Streets • Whether by bike, bus, rail, truck, or family car, Californians need the local system. • This report provides critical analysis on the local network condition and funding needs

  3. Study Objectives • What are conditions of local streets & roads? • How much will it cost to improve/maintain pavements in an acceptable condition? • What are safety, traffic & regulatory needs? • Is there a funding shortfall? If so, what is it?

  4. Local Streets & Roads are Huge Part of State Network 81% of California’s pavements are owned by cities and counties!

  5. Sidewalks ADA ramps Curb & gutter Storm drains Lighting It’s Not Just Pavements …

  6. Study Assumptions • 10 year analysis period • Constant 2008 $ • Pavement goal is best management practices • Inclusion of safety, traffic & regulatory elements • Does not include new streets or capital improvements.

  7. No Data 7% of centerline miles Data received 93% of centerline miles Data Collection • Total of 406 agencies • 56 counties • 350 cities • Missing 130 agencies • Mostly small cities • No data • No resources 29% no data 71% data rec’d

  8. Quality Assurance • Validation checks • Lengths – compared with HPMS • Areas – simple checks • Math errors • Mismatched units • Tests of reasonableness • Made follow-up calls/emails – only medium/large agencies

  9. How Good Are Pavement Data?

  10. Quality of Safety, Traffic & Regulatory / $$ Data • Safety, traffic & regulatory • 188 partial, 58 complete • Funding/expenditures • 29 counties & 108 cities responded

  11. Quick Facts from California Statewide Needs Assessment Study • Current Statewide Pavement Condition is 68, but will decline to 48 in 25 years • Requires $5 Billion PER YEAR over next 10 years to bring pavement only up to “good condition” • Requires $1.8 Billion/year to maintain pavement afterwards • Requires add’l $2 Billion/year to bring non-pavement components to good condition.

  12. Quick Facts from California Statewide Needs Assessment Study (cont.) Sponsored by: • California State Association of Counties • League of California Cities • County Engineers Association of California • County of Los Angeles • California Regional Transportation Planning Agencies • California Rural Counties Task Force

  13. Rating PCI 100 Excellent 85 Very Good 70 Good 55 Fair 40 Poor 25 Very Poor 10 Failed 0 Pavement Condition Index (PCI)

  14. City of Ventura – Public Works Excellent Condition (PCI Rating 100 to 85) 39 % of Our Roads are in this condition Engineering & Operations - Streets

  15. City of Ventura – Public Works Very Good & Good Condition (PCI Rating 85 to 55) 48 % of Our Roads are in this condition Engineering & Operations - Streets

  16. City of Ventura – Public Works Fair Condition (PCI Rating 55 to 40) 9 % of Our Roads are in this condition Engineering & Operations - Streets

  17. City of Ventura – Public Works Poor Condition (PCI Rating 40 to 25) 3 % of Our Roads are in this condition Engineering & Operations - Streets

  18. City of Ventura – Public Works Very Poor and Failing Conditions (PCI Rating Below 25) <1% of Our Roads are in this condition Engineering & Operations - Streets

  19. Statewide Average PCI = 68

  20. Why is 68 Critical? $2/sy 68 $15-40/sy $40-70/sy $60-100/sy

  21. Statewide Funding Sources

  22. Critical Revenue Streams • Proposition 42: Cities and Counties will receive approximately $592 million in FY 2009-10. • City of Ventura received $800,000 in 2009 • Primarily Used for Slurry Seal • Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA/Gas Tax): Cities and Counties will receive $986 million in FY 2009-10. • City of Ventura receives $2.2 million • Most flexible source of revenue used for operations and maintenance and rehabilitation of local roads.

  23. Transportation Funds in Jeopardy in FY 2010-11 • The State deferred the first two quarters of Proposition 42 funds to cities and counties in FY 2009-10. • The State also deferred seven months of gas tax subventions to cities and counties in FY 2009-10. • The Legislative Analysts’ Office projects another approximately $20 billion budget deficit over the next 18 months alone. • Transportation revenues continue to be in jeopardy.

  24. $79B 68 (at risk) PCI Backlog ($ billion) 48 (poor) $37B 2008 2033 What Happens If We Don’t Get More Funding State-wide?

  25. 38 cents/gallon! 38 cents/gal Total 10 Year Shortfall ($B)

  26. Funding Shortfall for City of Ventura • City of Ventura has a funding shortfall of $95 million for the next ten years. • City of Ventura has a backlog of $74 million.

  27. Summary • Good News • Data received represents 93% of local system • Statewide average PCI = 68 • Gas is $3.00/gallon today • Not so good news • PCI = 68 is at risk category & drops to 48 by 2033 with existing funding • Need to more than double existing funding to maintain transportation assets

  28. Questions?

More Related