Development of a Regional BRT System Proposal

1. Development of a Regional BRT System Proposal Crafting a package of bus-related projects for funding consideration under theAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act Presented to the TPB Access for All Committee April 23, 2009 Michael Eichler and Monica Bansal Transportation Planning Board staff

2. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act provides a real regional opportunity Although almost $50 billion in highway and transit transportation funding is mostly formula funding… $1.5 billion in competitive discretionary grants for capital projects What can we propose that would benefit the entire region and compete for these funds?

3. The bill tells us that projects will have to be: • National or regional in scope and impact • Multimodal • Ready-to-go • Completed quickly (< 3 years) • Relatively low-cost • Job creation/Economic benefit Current TPB and other regional initiatives point to bus rapid transit as a wide-reaching, flexible, and reasonable-cost focus for a regional project that could be implemented within a tight timeframe.

4. TPB Scenario Study Task Force charged TPB staff with assembling $300-million grant application for a pilot phase of a regional bus rapid transit (BRT) system. • Beginning with a series of existing regional initiatives that • could fit into broad requirements: • WMATA Priority Corridor Network (PCN) • TPB Regional Bus Subcommittee Priority Bus • Project List • TPB Scenario Study, CLRP Aspirations Scenario • Other state-wide and local initiatives

5. Working toward a Regional BRT Network Proposal to use stimulus funding to develop a pilot BRT project – a step towards demonstrating that BRT on a larger regional scale can really happen in the region.

6. What is Bus Rapid Transit?

7. Why BRT for the Washington Region? • An implementation of true BRT can: • Increase bus operating speeds • Reduce travel time variability • Increasing bus speeds can greatly reduce operating costs, which can provide for increase service levels. • The perception of a “new transit system” will: • Raise the perceived level of service for bus passengers • Provide increased levels of mobility across the region

8. How Does BRT Save Operating Costs? Before Priority Treatments After, keeping headway the same After, keeping buses the same • Increasing the bus speed by 50% results in: • 33% reduction in operating costs and capital needs, or • 33% reduction in headway with same operating costs.

9. Causes of Bus Delay

10. Smart Stations SWIFT, Snohomish WA Viva, York ON

11. Regulation of Peak Period Curb-Lane Parking San Francisco New York City

12. Bus Lanes New York City Boston 7th St NW, DC

13. Enforcement London Singapore London

14. Reversible Bus Lanes Colesville Rd, Silver Spring Connecticut Ave, NW DC

15. Queue Jumpers Charlotte Area Transit System (CATS)

16. Transit Signal Priority Viva, York ON

17. Full Dedicated Right-of-Way eMX, Eugene OR K St Busway, DC Los Angeles

18. Cost for BRT Strategies

19. Other requirements for BRT • Real-time arrival information • Includes regional real-time arrival prediction database • Distinctive identity and branding.

20. Current System

21. 22 13 18 11 10 14 6 8 24 4 23 20 15 7 12 19 21 9 7 1 17 16 3 5 2 WMATA Priority Corridor Network The WMATA Priority Corridor Network (PCN) proposes to enhance bus service along the top 24 bus transit routes in the region through a combination of service enhancements and running-way improvements

22. Arterial corridors recommended for evaluation in a Phase 1 BRT network eligible for stimulus funding. *

23. Next Steps • Continue to develop details on: • Routes for inclusion in plan • Priority treatments for each segment of proposed network • Further input provided by committees and task force. • USDOT guidelines for proposals released mid May • Project proposal due mid November

24. WMATA PCN Corridors