1 / 36

PARTIAL ACQUISITIONS: TO MOVE OR NOT TO MOVE

PARTIAL ACQUISITIONS: TO MOVE OR NOT TO MOVE IRWA’s 59 th Annual International Education Conference Charleston, WV Presented by: International Relocation Assistance Committee International Valuation Committee June 24, 2013. Rick Pino Partner Petersen LaChance Regan Pino, LLC.

vian
Download Presentation

PARTIAL ACQUISITIONS: TO MOVE OR NOT TO MOVE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PARTIAL ACQUISITIONS: TO MOVE OR NOT TO MOVE IRWA’s 59th Annual International Education Conference Charleston, WV Presented by: International Relocation Assistance Committee International Valuation Committee June 24, 2013

  2. Rick Pino Partner Petersen LaChance Regan Pino, LLC APPRAISAL BASICS

  3. FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTS Know purpose and the jurisdiction under which you are performing the valuation assignment Establish the basis for valuation development and reporting requirements • Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) • Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions (UASFLA) • Other entities with eminent domain power • Non-federal governmental (state, county, municipal) • Public and quasi-public agency or authorities • Private entities Determine critical definitions • Market Value • Real Estate/Real Property • Personal Property

  4. Unity of title • Unity of use • Contiguity or proximity LARGER PARCEL

  5. Tests • Legally Permissible • Physically Possible • Financially Feasible • Maximally Productive As if Vacant As Improved HIGHEST AND BEST USE

  6. Before and After Method Value of Property Before the Acquisition (Larger Parcel) Less the Value of Property After Acquisition (Remainder) Value Difference Value of Part Acquired  Value of the Acquisition (Plus) + Severance Damages (Less) - Special Benefits Value Difference Valuation Methodology

  7. Type of Property: Newly constructed 21,320 SF retail building 14,820 SF – Walgreens (drive-through) 6,500 SF – Typical retail space Pad site for 3,260 SF Wendy’s 137,538 SF (3.16 Acres) Site Highest & Best Use: As Vacant – Retail development As Improved – As developed Rents: 40.00 – Pharmacy $28.00 – Typical Retail Capitalization Rates: 6% - Pharmacy 7% - Typical Retail CASE STUDY 1

  8. Affected Property

  9. Site Plan - Before

  10. Acquisition Plan: Fee, Permanent and Temporary Easements

  11. Type of Property: Newly constructed 21,320 SF retail building 14,820 SF – Typical retail space 6,500 SF – Typical retail space 99,137 SF (2.28 Acres) Site Highest & Best Use: As Vacant – Retail development As Improved – As developed Rent: $28.00 – Typical Retail Capitalization Rate: 7% - Typical Retail Remainder Property

  12. Change in Highest & Best Use Value Before: $ 14,700,000 Value After: $ 8,000,000 Difference $ 6,700,000 No Change in Highest & Best Use Value Before: $ 14,700,000 Value After: $ 12,200,000 Difference $ 2,500,000 CASE STUDY 1 SUMMARY

  13. CASE STUDY 2Acquisition: Washington Street, Lynn, Massachusetts Use: A parking lot Site: 18,046 square feet, irregular shape with 99 feet of frontage Improvements: 52 open parking spaces History: Leased with adjacent propertyZoning: Central business zoning district Assessment: $36,000 R. E. Taxes: $1,206.98

  14. ACQUISITION & AFFECTED PROPERTY

  15. Acquisition: Washington Street, Lynn, Massachusetts Design: Single story commercial building, plus adjacent parking lot Use: Juvenile court facility Site: 18,042 square feet, irregular shape with 50 feet of frontage on Washington St. and 50 feet on Central St., plus adjacent parking lot Improvements: 18,042 square feet of building area History: Recently renovated for $1,971,174 or $109.25/SF of leasable area and recently leased for $28.20/SF of leasable area. Gross rent including tenant imp. costs over term Zoning: Central Business Zoning District Assessment: $1,321,400 R. E. Taxes: $43,936.55 Affected property

  16. Juvenile Court Building

  17. BUILDING PLAN

  18. As Vacant Assemblage parcel for parking and/or future development $9.00/SF of land area based on commercial development and/or parking sales range of $6.05 to $11.47, with average of $8.47/SF of land area As Improved Existing use of the property for juvenile court facility Build-to-suit rents courthouse facility rents range from $24.23 to $32.50, with average of $29.77/SF of leased building area Highest and Best Use Before

  19. As Vacant Assemblage parcel for parking and/or future development As Improved Use of the property for commercial/industrial use Comparable sales range from $31.74 to $50.97, with average of $40.61/SF of building area Rents range from $3.39 to $6.75/SF, with 10% vacancy, 7.5% expense ratio and cap rates 9% to 12% Requires $180,420 or $10.00/SF for demolition and removal of existing tenant improvement to return the space to market standard Highest and Best Use After

  20. Before and After Method $2,900,000 (Large Parcel) (Less) - $541,000 (Remainder) $2,359,000 (Value Difference) Value of Portion Acquired = $162,000 VALUE OF DAMAGES

  21. Move or Not to Move ?

  22. Importance of an in-depth BEFORE and AFTER Highest and Best Use Analysis Outcome of the analysis may affect the Agency’s project plan Proper planning may include advising agency of changes in use - proactive and may allow time for exploring other design alternatives Take away

  23. Janet Cruppi, SR/WA, R/W-RAC Michelle Colby, SR/WA, R/W-RAC, R/W- NAC Moderators Concept correlation

  24. This same concept is used in relocation planning • A thorough Non-residential Occupancy Interview is critical to establish the BEFORE • The AFTER - What is the effect of the partial acquisition on the business’s: • Access • Deliveries • Parking • Circulation • Ability to operate in a similar manner correlation

  25. Partial acquisition from a cattle ranch, Thermopolis, Wyoming Partial acquisition from a restaurant in Homer, Alaska Partial acquisition from a custom truck building facility in Anchorage, Alaska Real life scenarios

  26. Rick Etter Airports Acquisition Specialist Federal Aviation Administration Faa perspective

  27. Relocate on Airport? Not a displacement for Airfield Users, e.g. Airlines, other support services. • Relocate Off Airport? On airport business leased property needed for project, nowhere to move on airport. Typically displaced. • Off airport service business. Project need several years in future. Option not to be displaced. May leaseback acquired property long term. • Closed Airport. Tenant aviation business. Not displaced, no obligation in lease to continue operations. AIRPORT TENANTS & BUSINESSES

  28. Airfield (AOA) Tenant Leases Not Displaced by Airport Development (Works/Support for On-airport Operations) Example: Airline Hangar to be Removed for Airfield Construction • Airfield Lease is Re-negotiated with Airport • New Hangar Location Developed by Airport • As applicable credit unamortized value of Improvements/Moving Expense Other Issues with Airfield Leases: • Subtenants? Subject to Airfield Lease Relocate on Airport - Airfield Users

  29. Example: On-airport Rental Car • Airport Lease must be broken to use land for project (poor planning) • No on-airport location available, so displaced for project • Eligible for Relocation Assistance and Payments on Airport tenant – works on & off airport

  30. Example: Off Airport Parking, displaced business owner desires to stay on property as long as possible. Continued Occupancy offers: Full relocation assistance and payment eligibility must be offered and available now when property purchased. Or; Leaseback property pending project development in 5 years. • Subject to an 18 month lease, with three 12 month renewal options (extends a maximum of 60 months) • If tenant terminates lease within initial 18 month period, eligible for offered relocation eligibility. Off airport service business – airport customers & business

  31. Marshall Wainright Lead Realty Specialist FHWA Resource Center Federal Highway Administration FHWa perspective

  32. Janet Cruppi, SR/WA, R/W-RAC Michelle Colby, SR/WA, R/W-RAC, R/W- NAC Moderators Creative solutions

  33. Acquired 1 Ac from 3.8 ac site

  34. Site concept plan

  35. after configuration

  36. THANK YOU FOR ATTENDING questions

More Related