1 / 19

Rural Science Education: Aligning Purposes, Policies, Programs, and Practices

Rural Science Education: Aligning Purposes, Policies, Programs, and Practices. John R. Staver Professor of Science Education and Chemistry Co-Director, CRESME. Schwab’s Commonplaces. Teachers-Teaching Learners-Learning Context-Setting Subject Matter

vian
Download Presentation

Rural Science Education: Aligning Purposes, Policies, Programs, and Practices

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Rural Science Education: Aligning Purposes, Policies, Programs, and Practices John R. Staver Professor of Science Education and Chemistry Co-Director, CRESME

  2. Schwab’s Commonplaces Teachers-Teaching Learners-Learning Context-Setting Subject Matter “Scholars, as such, are incompetent to translate scholarly material into curriculum” (Schwab, J.J. (1973). The Practical 3: Translation into Curriculum. School Review 81, 510-522.

  3. Today’s Problem in Education Establishing coalitions, collaborations, teams, and partnerships among all groups that hold a stake in public K-12 education to align: • Purposes • Policies • Programs • Practices

  4. Align To bring the various elements or parts of a system into a state of consistency or coherence with each other (e.g., purposes, policies, programs, and practices)

  5. Purposes of U.S. Public K-12 Education • College preparation • Workforce preparation • Higher levels of science literacy

  6. Guiding Vision for Science Education Higher Levels of Science Literacy • National Science Education Standards (NRC, 1996) • Benchmarks for Science Literacy (AAAS, 1993)

  7. Policies How consistent with national science standards are: • No Child Left Behind? • State assessments of science achievement? • State adoption lists of approved science curricula?

  8. Programs How consistent with national science standards are elementary, middle level, and high school science curricula?

  9. Practices How consistent with national science standards is science instruction? • To what extent have we deemphasized teaching science as reading about science and as a rhetoric of its conclusions? • To what extent are we teaching science via guided inquiry (e.g. 5-E Model)?

  10. Limitations of Educational Research on Decisions about Purposes, Policies, and Programs • Cannot determine goals or standards, which are primarily a reflection of values • Cannot prescribe a curriculum or pedagogical approach for all students at all times

  11. Contributions of Educational Research • Inform decisions based on the probabilities that specific outcomes will result • Prevent mistakes • Show what is possible and what looks promising

  12. Emerging Formula for Raising Student Achievement at School and District Levels • Teachers - most important infrastructure • Form school - university - ESC - community partnerships that benefit all members (e.g., PDS) • Adopt & use standards-based curricula with support from administration • Continuing (years) professional development See Journal of Educational Research, 100(4). March/April 2007.

  13. Guided Inquiry Instructional Example Black Boxes

  14. Teaching Evolution National standards say yes! Many Americans say no! How can teachers of science honor national standards and decrease students’ and parents’ perceived conflicts with evolution?

  15. “Hot-Button” Words True Believe

  16. Alternative Language - True Evolutionary theory works: • As problem solving tool to explain and predict • To derive benefits (e.g., medicine, agriculture, industry) • If/when better problem solving tool is developed, scientists will use it Scharmann, L.C. (2005). A proactive strategy for teaching evolution. The American Biology Teacher 67(1), 12-16.

  17. Alternative Language - Believe Scientists accept evolutionary theory based on: • Several independent lines of evidence • Its ability to explain and predict • If/when contradictory evidence builds, ability to explain and predict decreases, and suitable contending theory appears, scientists will use it. Scharmann, L.C. (2005). A proactive strategy for teaching evolution. The American Biology Teacher 67(1), 12-16. NAS & IE (2007). Science, evolution, and creationism. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

  18. Interacting with Parents Outside Science Class Use analogies, for example: • Evolution or Intelligent Design • Is science atheistic? • It’s only fair to teach ID

  19. Annenberg/CPB Math and Science Project (1996). NSTA Awareness Kit for The National Sciece Education Standards. Armonk, NY: The Learning Team, Inc.

More Related