1 / 4

LDP Extensions for Multi Topology draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-multi-topology-11

LDP Extensions for Multi Topology draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-multi-topology-11. Luyuan Fang Microsoft Lianyuan Li Quintin China Mobile Dan iel King Old Dog Consulting . Quintin Zhao Huawei Technology Kamran Raza Chao Zhao Cisco Systems . IETF 89 - London.

vianca
Download Presentation

LDP Extensions for Multi Topology draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-multi-topology-11

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. LDP Extensions for Multi Topologydraft-ietf-mpls-ldp-multi-topology-11 • Luyuan Fang Microsoft Lianyuan Li Quintin China Mobile Daniel KingOld Dog Consulting • Quintin ZhaoHuawei TechnologyKamran Raza Chao Zhao Cisco Systems IETF 89 - London

  2. draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-multi-topology-09 • Post Last Call (November 2013) • A number of comments were received from: • GenART， Joel Halpern • IANA • SEC-DIR， Kathleen Moriarty • RTG-DIR， Adrian Farrel IETF 89 - London

  3. Changes in the latest version (v10/v11) • Made MT Capability a global capability, and not per topology capability. • Fixed the use of Typed Wildcard FEC when sent in a MT Capability TLV. • Clarification of the Procedures: What to do if Dynamical Announcement Capability is not supported. • Proposed MPLS Registry (instead of LDP one) to track MT IDs. • Clarified that MIB extensions are beyond this I-D scope. • Removed mLDP MT FEC as it is now covered in a separate document. IETF 89 - London

  4. Progressing I-D • Authors submitted new version in February 14, 2014. • Update highlighting changes sent to list. • GenART, SEC-DIR, RTG-DIR, emailed with update and clarification text/response. • Authors would like move the I-D forward. - Can we progress? - Is a short WG Last Call required? IETF 89 - London

More Related