1 / 16

Improved Method for Measuring the Satellite-to-Satellite TEC in the Ionosphere by S. Syndergaard

Improved Method for Measuring the Satellite-to-Satellite TEC in the Ionosphere by S. Syndergaard H.-H. Benzon G. B. Larsen M. B. Sørensen P. Høeg Atmosphere Ionosphere Remote Sensing Division Danish Meteorological Institute. Setting the scene: Ionosphere occultation principle.

vidal
Download Presentation

Improved Method for Measuring the Satellite-to-Satellite TEC in the Ionosphere by S. Syndergaard

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Improved Method for Measuring the Satellite-to-Satellite TEC in the Ionosphere by S. Syndergaard H.-H. Benzon G. B. Larsen M. B. Sørensen P. Høeg Atmosphere Ionosphere Remote Sensing Division Danish Meteorological Institute

  2. Setting the scene: Ionosphere occultation principle

  3. Ionosphere tomography combining ground and space measurements Convenient to assume straight lines

  4. GPS observables and traditional TEC measure Disregarding troposphere, clocks & ambiguity bias: • On occultation links the traditional measure is not exactly the straight line TEC • Discrepancy becomes appreciable for large electron density gradients

  5. Occultation geometry

  6. S-S TEC with first order dispersion correction (“major” term) (“minor” term) • Mainly proportional to the square of vertical TEC gradients • Accuracy depends on validity of spherical symmetry assumption

  7. Simulated TEC residuals, double Chapman layers E-layer: Max. dens.: 2·1011 m-3 Scale height: 5 km F-layer: Max. dens.: 3·1012 m-3 Scale height: 60 km

  8. GPS/MET ionosphere profile, occ. 641, Feb 20 1997 Local time: 12:30 Latitude: 36 N Longitude: 144 E Solar flux: 73

  9. GPS/MET TEC profile, occ. 641, Feb 20 1997 Local time: 12:30 Latitude: 36 N Longitude: 144 E Solar flux: 73

  10. GPS/MET estimated TEC residuals, occ. 641, Feb 20 1997

  11. Ørsted ionosphere profile, April 18 1999 Local time: 14:45 Latitude: 33 S Longitude: 13 W Solar flux: 113

  12. Ørsted TEC profile, April 18 1999 Local time: 14:45 Latitude: 33 S Longitude: 13 W Solar flux: 113

  13. Ørsted estimated TEC residuals, April 18 1999

  14. Alternative estimate of straight line S-S TEC ) ( traditional combination for comparison • Corrects for first order dispersion effects • Not sensitive to spherical asymmetry • Drawback: clocks and POD needs to be solved (removed)

  15. Simulated TEC residuals, spherical asymmetry conditions

  16. Summary • Satellite-to-satellite TEC  L1 - L2 may give TEC errors • of order 10 TECU • Not a big problem at low solar activity or night time • (error < 1 TECU) • May be a problem at day time, solar maximum • Dispersion correction reduce errors depending on • spherical symmetry assumption • Alternative dual frequency combination can be applied, • but then one needs to solve for clocks and POD • Results can be used in ionosphere tomography to obtain more • accurate straight-line satellite-to-satellite TEC

More Related