180 likes | 318 Views
The Potential for Improved Tropical Cyclone Forecasts from High-Resolution Global Modeling – Results from the HFIP 2009 Summer Experiment. Mike Fiorino Global Systems Division michael.fiorino@noaa.gov Jeff Whitaker and Tom Hamill Physical Sciences Division Earth System Research Laboratory
E N D
The Potential for Improved Tropical Cyclone Forecasts from High-Resolution Global Modeling –Results from the HFIP 2009 Summer Experiment Mike Fiorino Global Systems Division michael.fiorino@noaa.gov Jeff Whitaker and Tom Hamill Physical Sciences Division Earth System Research Laboratory Boulder, CO 3 March 2010
Hi-Res Global Modeling for HFIP 2009 • TACC supercomputer – yes we can! run hi-res global model (> ECMWF) in near real time in the USA • FIM – Flow-following Icosahedral Model (fim.noaa.gov) (IC = GFS GSI) • (fim8, f8em) G8 – 30 km; 00Z/12 • (fim9, f9em) G9 – 15 km; 00/12Z • (f0em) G9.5 – 10 km; 00Z only • (f8XX) G8 – 39 km; 21-member ensemble • GFS (T382 ~ 45 km) • 60-member EnKF – highest-ever global EnKF • 21-member ensemble with EnKF
Mean Forecast Error for Hi-Res Models > 72 h : 8-14 cases @ 48h : EnKF lower error, no clear benefit from hi res
Intensity Bias/Error for Hi-Res Models improved Vmax error with hi-res assimilate central pressure in EnKF IC : lower bias (-30 -15 kt)
Ensembles for my :: what the 2tell me… • ensembles attempt to ‘sample’ the model error space • how well ensembles sample/forecast error depends on the ratio of ‘spread’ to ‘error’; ideal is 1:1 or spread ~ error • potential for accurate ‘guidance on the guidance’ or ‘forecast of forecast error’ • ‘error’ = track forecast error
21-member GFS(T382) Ensemble using ESRL EnKF03L.2009 aka BILL 2009081700 “spread” = mean of the distance between each member and the ensemble mean position initial spread ~ 25 nm
The Bob Gall Plot – depict intensity in the ensembles…03L.2009 aka BILL 2009081700 colorize track segment based on difference between member intensity and mean intensity – which members are intensifying v weakening
Spread v Error haloes… spread ~ error (good)03L.2009 aka BILL 2009081700 add verifying track and the forecast error halo desired relationship – error ~ spread
Spread v Error for ECMWF EPS(T399)03L.2009 aka BILL 2009081700 EPS under dispersive – spread << error
Some takeaways… • HFIP summer 2009 test demonstrated that models with res ≥ ECMWF can be run in near real-time on USA computers… • hi-res, however, is not a sufficient condition…for track/intensity skill, i.e., we can’t compute our way to improved TC forecasting with more CPUs… modeling challenge is still physics as Δx 10 km • hi-res global ensembles showed both good track forecast skill and spread/error ratios ~ 1 potential for forecasting the forecast error,but all systems under dispersive
resources:FIM: http://fim.noaa.govCurrent TC EPS graphics: http://ruc.noaa.gov/hfip/tcepsCurrent TC EPS tracks (google map): http://ruc.noaa.gov/tracksPython S/W to analyze/display ATCF data:http://sourceforge.net/projects/wxmap2/