1 / 52

Florida Developmental Disabilities Council, Inc. Transportation: Past, Present and Future

Florida Developmental Disabilities Council, Inc. Transportation: Past, Present and Future Presentation by Sheila Gritz-Swift, Deputy Director of Programs. 2011-2016. Culmination of Transportation Stakeholders’ Group

vidor
Download Presentation

Florida Developmental Disabilities Council, Inc. Transportation: Past, Present and Future

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Florida Developmental Disabilities Council, Inc. Transportation: Past, Present and Future Presentation by Sheila Gritz-Swift, Deputy Director of Programs

  2. 2011-2016 • Culmination of Transportation Stakeholders’ Group • Collaboration with Florida Department of Transportation on Transportation Voucher Pilots • Implementation of a Transportation Options Research Project

  3. 2017-2021 • State Plan Goal, Objectives and Activities • Culmination of 2011-16 initiatives in 2017 • Transportation Goal • Sustainable solutions • Infrastructure change • Increased access to safe and affordable transportation

  4. 2017-2021 • Transportation Goal Major Activities Tentatively Planned • Mobility Management • Travel Training • Data collection or database on unmet needs

  5. “Florida’s Transportation Voucher Pilot Program: A Model for 24-Hour Inclusive Community Transportation”

  6. Conceptual Idea • Transportation to employment, postsecondary education/training and the greater community • Vouchers for requesting rides • Sedans and paratransit with wheelchair lifts as needed • Seven days a week, including nights, weekends and holidays at no additional cost to rider

  7. Collaboration • Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) • Florida Developmental Disabilities Council, Inc. (FDDC) • Urban Model • Hillsborough Area Regional Transition Authority (HART) HARTPlus Customer Choice Voucher Pilot Project • Rural Model • Citizens for Improved Transportation (CIT)

  8. Awards and Implementation • Start-up Funding • Process/Procurement • Pricing • Quality Assurance • Issues Along the Way

  9. Outcomes and Impact… • HART • ¾ mile trips to 7.6 mile trips • 3 day notice to 24-hour transportation availability • Improved access to community • 27,813 trips at $16.00 a trip • Cost of $445,008 versus $1,001,268 • Total savings of $556,260 • 8% growth • Self-supporting after one year of funding

  10. …Outcomes and Impact… • CIT • Year 2 • 1,533 rides • Approximately $54,912.06 to date (Year 2) for paratransit, monthly bus passes and taxis • Employment, education and job training with majority for employment • Working on sustainability and more options for flexible schedules

  11. …Outcomes and Impact • CIT • Belle Glade, South Bay and Pahokee residents • $8.05 per hour to $16.00 per hour • Access for training and employment • Several riders unemployed and turning down jobs; now employed at $10.00 per hour • Access to employment

  12. Promising/Supporting Legislative Action 2017 • CS/HB 221 “Uber/Lyft Bill” • s. 627.748, F.S.   • Background checks • Insurance requirements

  13. Transportation Options Research Project

  14. Desired Outcomes • Identified evidence-based and promising practice programs and resources leading to new approaches that increase affordable and accessible transportation • Improved knowledge of key transportation stakeholders • Improved transportation services

  15. Key Objectives of Project • National research on affordable and accessible transportation options • Gaps analysis between Florida and states with successful programs • Recommendations for replication of successful practices

  16. Key Components of Project • Gap Analysis • Florida Transportation Analysis (FTA) • Florida Case Study (FCS) • National Research Synthesis (NRS) • Successful Practices/Recommendations • Five primary/crucial needs from FTA • Subordinate needs from FTA and FCS • Recommendations from FCS and NRS

  17. Persons with Disabilities and Caregivers Endorsed Needs… • No evening transportation 46 • No transportation for recreation 41 • Timeliness (e.g., late pickups or long waits) 41 • Frequency of rides during the day 40 • Availability of stops 39 • Not willing to cross county lines 37 • Routes not near critical services 36 • Unable to make multiple stops 36 • Knowledge of the area by drivers 34

  18. …Persons with Disabilities and Caregivers Endorsed Needs… • Driver friendliness and knowledge of people with disabilities 30 • Driver turnover 29 • Poor communication of routes 25 • Cost of ride 23 • Ease of scheduling a pickup 22 • Wi-Fi availability 18 • Inability to have caregivers on paratransit 18 • Passes difficult to obtain online 13

  19. …Persons with Disabilities and Caregivers Endorsed Needs • Language barrier with drivers 11 • Cleanliness 8 • Lack of understanding of AT needs 7 • Exact change needed 4 • Demeaning comments from passersby 3

  20. Critical Need Categories

  21. Five Critical Need Categories • Reliable and Adequate Funding • Access and Expansion of Transportation Services • Transportation Cost, Quality and Collaboration • Client (Rider) Awareness and Understanding • Other Accessibility Issues

  22. Five Critical Need Categories

  23. 1. Reliable and Adequate Funding • Invest in paratransit vehicles and maintenance • Improve uniformity in match/faster reimbursement • Invest in hiring and retaining qualified drivers

  24. 2. Access and Expansion Issues… • Availability in rural areas • Limited hours/schedules • Availability of specialized vehicles • Limited number or runs • On-time transportation • Insufficient or difficult to understand signage • Lack of audible stop announcements • Insufficient information on availability

  25. …2. Access and Expansion Issues • Barriers created by legislation or policy • Insufficient number of accessible vehicles/buses • Negative attitudes of transportation operators/employees • Poorly trained employees • Shops not being accessible from stops • Bus stop accessibility

  26. 3. Cost, Quality and Collaboration • Fixed route connectivity • Reliability, cleanliness and quality of vehicles • Travel times too long for comfort or guaranteeing on time arrival

  27. 4. Rider Awareness and Understanding • Online training options with easy access • Descriptions of services • Door-to-door • Assistance on ingress and egress • Languages spoken by driver • Wheelchair accessibility

  28. 5. Other Accessibility Issues • More sidewalks of better quality and accessible recreation trails • Improved transportation of community festivals and events • Improved training and support of airport and other mass transit security on understanding and interacting with persons with disabilities

  29. Strategies from Data Analysis

  30. Strategies from Data Analysis • Policy/Infrastructure • Safety • Funding, Fund Raising and Donations • Communication/Training • Flexibility/Adaptation to Community Needs • Equipment and Drivers

  31. Strategies from Data Analysis

  32. 1. Policy/Infrastructure • Expand paratransit eligibility and advertisements for services • Expand the fixed route system • Develop state-wide prepaid card system

  33. 2. Safety • Improve access with sidewalks • Improve access to bus stops • Require Level 2 background screening for paratransit drivers

  34. 3. Funding, Fund Raising and Donations • Improve number, quality and drivers of fleets • Increase numbers of trips • Increase hours of service • Improve geographic coverage • Leverage funding, including fund-raising • Improve identification of, access to, expertise in writing, and skills in managing grant funds and sustaining services • Create a flexible system for soliciting, receiving and processing donations

  35. 4. Communication/Training • Educating the public • Holding quarterly TD meetings • Investing time in community outreach

  36. 5. Flexibility/Adaptation to Community Needs • Flexibility • Hours and Routes • Quality and Efficiency

  37. 6. Equipment and Drivers • Understand the workforce and turnover • Create equity in wages • Assign routes and duties with equity • Minimize administrative tasks

  38. National Research

  39. National: Large/Urban Cities • Boston, Massachusetts • Denver, Colorado • Los Angeles, California • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania • Portland, Oregon • Seattle, Washington

  40. National: Mid-Sized Cities • Charleston, South Carolina • Providence, Rhode Island • New Haven, Connecticut • Salt Lake City, Utah • Syracuse, New York

  41. National: Rural Projects • The Arc, Connecticut • Ride Connection, Oregon • Jewish Council for Aging, Maryland • Lewis and Clark, Montana • Community Action Committee, Tennessee • TRIP, California • Mobility Outreach Project, Michigan

  42. National Research Components • Background • Costs and Revenues • Identified Gaps and Obstacles • Strategies to Address Gaps and Obstacles • Innovations/Adaptions • Projects/Programs

  43. Florida Gap Analysis

  44. Florida Gap Analysis • Relevance • Degree the strategy would have the desired effect on improving transportation if implemented • Feasibility • Degree the strategy would be implemented with reasonable changes in state, regional or local transportation practice

  45. Case Study

  46. Case StudyNon-Institutionalized Persons with Disabilities (NIPD) High NIPD Counties Low NIPD Counties Alachua Leon Miami-Dade Palm Beach St. Johns • Bay • Charlotte • Citrus • Hernando • Putnam

  47. Recommendations

  48. Recommendations… • Need 1 • Establish and Support Reliable Funding and Support from Policy Makers • Need 2 • Improve Access, Collaboration and Expansion of Transportation Services • Need 3 • Improve Efficiency, Cost and Quality of Transportation Services

More Related