730 likes | 921 Views
Data Analysis Retreat: May 19-21, 2010. School of Education Campbellsville University. Why? Standard 2: Assessment System and Unit Evaluation. The unit has an assessment system that collects and analyzes data on applicant qualifications, candidate performance, graduate performance and
E N D
Data AnalysisRetreat: May 19-21, 2010 School of Education Campbellsville University
Why? Standard 2: Assessment System and Unit Evaluation The unit has an assessment system that collects and analyzes data on applicant qualifications, candidate performance, graduate performance and unit operations Purpose to evaluate and improve the performance of candidates, the unit and its programs.
Why? NCATE Standard 2b: Candidate assessment data are regularly and systematically collected, compiled, aggregated, summarized and analyzed to Improve candidate performance Improve program quality Improve unit operations
Why? NCATE Standard 2c The unit regularly and systematically uses data, including candidate and graduate performance information to evaluate the efficacy of its Courses Programs Clinical experiences
Why? NCATE Standard 2c The unit analyzes program evaluation and performance data to initiate changes in Programs Unit operations
Overview • Data for 2009 • Compared to 2006-2008 • Undergraduate Programs • CAPs 1, 2, 3, 4 • Praxis II • Diversity Proficiencies • Graduate Programs: MAE/SED/Rank I • CAPs 5, 6 and 7 • Faculty/Course Evaluations
CAP 1: Admission to TE 2009 • Number Admitted Sp09: 27 F09: 22 2009 Total: 49 Analysis: 9-14 < previous three years • GPA Sp09 3.46 F09 3.44 09 Av. 3.45 06-08 Av. 3.40 > previous three years
CAP 1 Dispositions 2009 • Average 2009 4.36 • Average 2006-2009 4.17 • Sp 09 4.35 ; F 09 4.37 • Highest(4) Honest/Ethical 4.53 (1) Caring 4.40 • Lowest(3) Values Ind. Differences 4.27 (5) Responsible Class. Behavior 4.27
CAP 1: Diversity 2009 • Age: most common range—16-25, 83/91% • Gender 76% females ; 24% males • Ethnicity 96/91% white; Black 4%; Hispanic 2% • Exceptionality 26% < previous 21% GT; .5% LD; 1% visual; .5 ADD; 76% unidentified • 2nd Language 15% 7% Spanish • Religion Baptist- 59%; Christian-26%; Catholic-7%; Methodist-4%
CAP 1: Diversity 2009 • Live at home: 13%, < all previous • Work: 30%, < all previous • Income: 80% Blank 2% 25,401-42,802 9% 42,803-67,326 More did not answer. • Father High school: 65%; College: 11%; Graduate: 11% • Mother: High school: 54 %; College: 22%; Graduate: 13%
CAP 2: Continuation in TE 2009 • 39 Approved • Overall GPA: • 3.40/3.29 3.36 average • < all previous and 06-09 average • Professional GPA: • 3.75/3.70 3.73 average • < all previous • Field Hours: 40, > previous • PPD Hours: 11, > previous
CAP 3: 2009Admission to Student Teaching • Total 2009: 47 • GPA: • Overall GPA: 3.39 • Major GPA: 3.42 • Prof. GPA: 3.77 • Dispositions: • Overall: 4.59 • Education Professor: 4.24 • Cooperating Teacher: 4.77 • Self Evaluation: 4.53 • Instrument changed fall, 2006
CAP 3: Field/PPD Hours 2009 • Total:Field hours-130.35; PPD-32.57 • Type: • Assisting 96%, consistently high • Instructing 91%, consistently high • Observing 96%, consistently high • Research 55%, comparable to previous • Tutoring 64%, < f08 • Participating in education related community events • Interacting with families of students • Attending school board meetings • Diversity: • Ethnicity 92%, comparable to 06 & 08 • Exceptionality 89%, < previous years • Gender 89% • Linguistic * 55%, < previous • Race 81%, < 07, 08 • Religious 62% • Socio-econ. 87%
CAP 3: Portfolios 2009 • Portfolio Mean Holistic Score2.49 < fall, 2008 2.70 • Changeover to KTS in fall 2008 • 2009 Highlights • Highest • KTS 3 Climate 2.90 • KTS 1 Content 2.78 • Lowest • KTS 5 Assessment 2.44 • KTS 7 Reflection 2.46 • KTS 8 Collaboration 2.54
NTS-Spring, 2008 Highest NTS 4 Assessment 2.73 NTS 2 Climate 2.68 Lowest NTS 5 Reflection 2.54 NTS 6 Collaboration 2.46 NTS 3 Implement 2.42 KTS Fall, 2008 Highest KTS 3 Climate 2.91 KTS 10 Leadership 2.85 Lowest KTS 5 Assessment 2.51 CAP 3 Portfolios Holistic Scores: Past
CAP 3: Portfolios by Majors- 2009 • Comparisons: • P-5: • Highest KTS 3 Climate; Lowest KTS 4 Design • 5-9 • Highest KTS 3 Climate; Lowest KTS 6 Technology, KTS 5 Assessment • 8-12: • Highest KTS 3 Climate; Lowest KTS 5 Assessment KTS 7 Reflection • P-12: • Highest KTS 3 Climate; Lowest KTS 8 Collaboration KTS 5 Assessment
CAP 3 Growth Areas 2009 • KTS 5 Assessment • Communicating learning results 2.14 • Allows student self assessment 2.20 • KTS 7 Reflection • Uses data to reflect and identify areas for professional growth 2.26
CAP 4: 2009 • 63 Approved Spring/Fall Represents a steady increase over last four years • Cumulative GPA: 3.55 > than previous • Major GPA: 3.62 (3.70/3.49) Overall > than last four years; f09 is <last two years • Professional GPA: 3.76 Comparable to previous
CAP 4 Clinical Experiences 2009 • Diversity • Ethnicity 97% >08, 07 • Exceptionality 95% • Language 67% (59/81%) < • Race92% < 08, 07 • Religion: 76% > • Socioeconomic: 98% > • Gender: 98% > than previous
CAP 4 Clinical Experiences 2009 • Assisting: 100% > last 2 • Instructing: 100% = to previous • Observing: 98% > 08, 06 • Research: 75% < 06, 07 • Tutoring: 79% < previous • Attend school board meetings • Interacting with families • Participate in education related community events
CAP 4 Dispositions 2009 Univ. Supv. Self • #1 Caring 4.62 4.87 • #2 Respects others 4.63 4.90 • #3 Values indiv. Diff.* 4.52 4.76 • #5 Honest/ethical 4.78 4.92 • #6 Responsible 4.57 4.77 classroom behavior*
CAP 4: Portfolios by Major, 2009 Portfolio Scores: KTS P-5 2.95 < 5-9 3.00 8-12 • Biology • English 2.33 < • Math 3.00 • Soc. St. 2.75 < P-12 • Art 3.00 • Music 2.82 < • PE 3.00
CAP 4 Portfolio Growth Areas 2009 • KTS 5 • Lowest is ‘Communicates learning results’ • Next lowest are ‘Describes, analyzes and evaluates performance data’ & ‘Allows student self assessment’ • KTS 7 • Lowest: ‘Uses data to reflect on and identify areas for professional growth’
CAP 4: Praxis Data--2009 • PLT: Passing Score of 161 • P-5: 0522 177.58 < 06, 08 • 5-9: 0523 • English-168; Math-180; Science; 176; Soc. St. 181 • Soc. St/English-185; Math/Soc.St.-180 • 8-12: 0524 • English-158; Biology-179; Soc. St.-176; Math-184 • P-12 (Choice) • Music 169 • Art 169 • PE/Health 174
CAP 4: Praxis II Data 2009 • Level Passing Mean • P-5 148 168.42 • 5-9 • English 158 159 • Math 148 166 • Science 144 148 • Social St. 149 154 • SocSt/Eng 149/158 160/192 • Math/SocSt 148/149 166/168
Praxis II Data 2009 Passing Mean • Biology 146 185 • English 160/155 181/158 • Math 125/141 139/161 • SocSt. 151/159 163/165 • Art 154/158 160/161 • Music 145/154 148/161 • PE/Hlth 147/151/630 152/158/677
CAP 1 IECE: Fall 2009 • Approved: 29 all locations • Overall GPA: 3.37 • ACT: 22.13 • PPST: 176.25 Reading 172.75 Mathematics 174.50 Writing Note: IECE programs began in Fall 2009. Data for IECE are presented separately from other data; the IECE data will also be disaggregated by location.
CAP 2: IECE Fall, 2009 • Number approved: 6 • Grade point average: 3.40 • Foundations courses: 3.77 • Field Hours: 177.50 • PPD Hours: 20.25
Age: 42% 26-35 38% 16-25% Gender: 100% F Exceptionality: 97% no 2nd language: 100% No Father: 12% College Mother: 27% College Religion: 42% Christian 24% Baptist 15% Catholic 9% Methodist IECE: Diversity Data 2009
IECE Disposition Data: Fall, 2009 Prof. Prof. Prof. Self Overall • Caring: 4.0 4.83 4.85 4.63 4.76 • Respects: 4.0 4.50* 4.85 4.69 4.63 • Values: 4.0 4.71 4.62* 4.56* 4.63 • Honest: 5.0 4.92 4.85 4.88 4.89 • ProfResp. 5.0 4.46 4.83 4.63 4.60*
MAE: CAP 5 Admission 2009 • 2009: 2 (13-2008) <from previous • GPA: 3.69 > all previous years • Dispositions Mean: 5.00 > all previous