1 / 8

The Encoding Complexity of Two Dimensional Range Minimum Data Structures

Assumption m ≤ n. Cost Space (bits) Query time Preprocessing time Models Indexing (input accessible ) Encoding (input not accessible ). The Encoding Complexity of Two Dimensional Range Minimum Data Structures. i 1. i 2. j 1. j 2. RMQ( i 1 , i 2 , j 1 , j 2 ) = (2,3)

viet
Download Presentation

The Encoding Complexity of Two Dimensional Range Minimum Data Structures

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Assumption m ≤ n Cost • Space (bits) • Query time • Preprocessing time Models • Indexing (input accessible) • Encoding (input not accessible) The Encoding Complexity of Two Dimensional Range Minimum Data Structures i1 i2 j1 j2 RMQ(i1, i2, j1, j2) = (2,3) = positionof min European Symposium on Algorithms, Inria, Sophia Antipolis, France, September 3, 2013

  2. Some (Trivial) Results

  3. Encoding m = 1 (Cartesiantree) RMQ(j1, j2) = NCA(j1,j2) To support RMQ queriesweneed... • treestructure (111101001100110000100100) • mappingbetween nodes and cells (inorder) 1 2 8 3 9 4 10 6 14 5 11 7 n j1 j2 1 min ?

  4. Some (Less Trivial) Results

  5. New Results • O(nm(log m+loglogn)) bits • treerepresentation • component decomposition • O(nmlogmlog* n)) bits • bootstrapping • O(nmlogm) bits • relative positions of roots • refined component construction

  6. TreeRepresentation Requirements • Cells leafs • Query Answer = rightmostleaf 12 10 8 6 7 2 1 12 10 8 11 9 6 7 5 4 3 2 Trivial solution • Sort leafs • Ω(mnlogn) bits 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

  7. Components  = 3 Construction • Consider elements in decreasingorder • Find connected components with size≥  • L-adjacency  |C1|≤ 4-3, |Ci|≤ 2m Representation O(mn + mn/log n + mnlogm + mnlog(m))  =log n  O(mn(log m+loglogn)) L 1 L-adjacency 12 10 8 11 9 6 7 5 4 3 2 C2 C3 C1 1 Spanningtreestructures Spanningtreeedges Local leafranks in components Component rootpositions 12 10 8 11 9 6 7 5 4 3 2

  8. Results better upper or lower bound ? Thank you

More Related