1 / 48

So, How Did You Do?

So, How Did You Do?. MCI Triage:. 2006 Advanced Practice Centers for Preparedness Training Conference. Why Am I Here?. In a disaster, needs exceed resources More patients than providers Difficult choices must be made Who receives care now? Who does not? How do I decide?

viho
Download Presentation

So, How Did You Do?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. So, How Did You Do? NACCHO 02-2006

  2. MCI Triage: 2006 Advanced Practice Centers for Preparedness Training Conference NACCHO 02-2006

  3. Why Am I Here? • In a disaster, needs exceed resources • More patients than providers • Difficult choices must be made • Who receives care now? • Who does not? • How do I decide? • ...TRIAGE NACCHO 02-2006

  4. Triage and Public Health Competencies CDC & CUSN-CHP (2002). Bioterrorism & Emergency Readiness: Competencies for All Public Health Workers, p. 12 NACCHO 02-2006

  5. Objectives • Define “Triage” • Identify goals of MCI triage • Implement “MASS” Triage • Classify MCI victims by “ID-me” categories NACCHO 02-2006

  6. In a Perfect World... • First responders respond to scene • Patients are triaged in the field • HazMat handles decon in the field • Sickest patients arrive with EMS: • Already sorted and tagged • Already decontaminated • Already partially treated • All “we” have to do is take care of them! NACCHO 02-2006

  7. What REALLY Happens... • “Chaotic” phase: 15-25 min • No EMS, no scene leader • 80% of minimally injured self-transport • They arrive at closest hospitals: • NO TRIAGE • NO DECONTAMINATION • NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION NACCHO 02-2006

  8. Another Awful Thought... • Hospital as “Hot Zone” • Or.... • It’s your “off “day • Or… • Flu Pandemic, Bioterrorism… NACCHO 02-2006

  9. Triage: Definition • Sorting of patients by seriousness of condition and likelihood of survival NACCHO 02-2006

  10. Triage: Goals • Primary Goal: • Greatest good for the greatest number of possible survivors • Secondary Goal: • Relief of suffering • Depend on available resources NACCHO 02-2006

  11. Triage Systems • Multiple triage systems in use • Various methods using tags, categories, colors,symbols • Familiarize yourself with your agency’s system and PRACTICE it • IDEAL = one uniform system used by all agencies in the field & at hospitals NACCHO 02-2006

  12. “M.A.S.S.”Triage M – Move A – Assess S – Sort S – Send NACCHO 02-2006

  13. “M.A.S.S.” Triage • Developed by the military • Tested & used by the military • Adapted for civilian disasters • It works! • Fast • Accurate (70%) • Can handle large numbers of victims NACCHO 02-2006

  14. “M.A.S.S.”Triage • GROUP victims first... then.... • ...ASSESS individual victims NACCHO 02-2006

  15. Basis of “M.A.S.S.”Triage • Ability to MOVE best predicts survival • Head Injury patients • Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) NACCHO 02-2006

  16. “M.A.S.S.” Triage “MOVE”: STEP 1 • Goal: • Group - Victims who can WALK • Action: • “Everyone who can hear me and who can walk, please move to the area with the green flag.” MINIMAL NACCHO 02-2006

  17. Why Bother With Them FIRST? • MINIMAL group: major vital functions intact • Assess last, after more critical groups • However, actively managing this group may: • Facilitate scene management • Conserve scene resources • Reduce self-transports & overburdening of nearest hospital ERs • Caveats: • No individual assessment, yet • Worsening conditions NACCHO 02-2006

  18. “M.A.S.S.” Triage “MOVE”: STEP 2 • Goal: • Group – Victims who can’t walk, but who can MOVE • Action: • Ask the remaining victims “Everyone who can hear me and needs help, please raise an arm or leg so we can come help you.” DELAYED NACCHO 02-2006

  19. “M.A.S.S.” Triage “ASSESS”: • Goal: • Group – Identify who is left, victims unable to walk & unable to follow simple commands to move • Action: • Go immediately to these patients for life-saving interventions (if medically trained) NACCHO 02-2006

  20. “M.A.S.S.” Triage “ASSESS” IMMEDIATE patients: • Goal: • Accurate count of IMMEDIATE patients • Action: • Rapidly Assess ABCs • If not or already DEAD • Correct immediate life threats… EXPECTANT NACCHO 02-2006

  21. “M.A.S.S.” Triage “ASSESS” IMMEDIATE patients: • Open Airway • Stop Bleeding • Give Chemical antidote www.rk19-bielefeld-mitte.de www.tpub.com www.meridianmeds.com NACCHO 02-2006

  22. “M.A.S.S.” Triage “ASSESS” IMMEDIATE patients: • Open Airway • Stop Bleeding • Give Chemical antidote Pressure Points Whatever it takes! Be creative! Tourniquets NACCHO 02-2006

  23. “M.A.S.S.” Triage “ASSESS” IMMEDIATE patients: • Question: • Is transport available? • Move on! NACCHO 02-2006

  24. Victim Group Summary NACCHO 02-2006

  25. ONLY NOW Do We Assess Individuals • Having grouped victims according to their ability to move... • ...The next phase entails more detailed individual assessment. NACCHO 02-2006

  26. “M.A.S.S.” Triage “SORT”: • Goal: • Sort patients based upon INDIVIDUAL assessment • Actions: • Assign to “ID-me” Categories: • IMMEDIATE, DELAYED, MINIMAL, • Continue treatment EXPECTANT NACCHO 02-2006

  27. “M.A.S.S.” Triage “SORT”: • Start with those who could MOVE • Unless sufficient personnel for all groups • Ideal: trained medical personnel • May not be available • Tag immediately upon triage • Including dead victims NACCHO 02-2006

  28. There Are Many Different Patient Assessment Tools www.usmc.mil/marinelink/mcn2000 CERT L.A. 2003 NACCHO 02-2006

  29. START Triage “R” “P” “M” NACCHO 02-2006

  30. “ID-me” Categories • I - IMMEDIATE • D - DELAYED • M - MINIMAL EXPECTANT LETHAL INJURY E - EXPECTANT NACCHO 02-2006

  31. “M.A.S.S.” Triage “SORT” – IMMEDIATE: • Life- or Limb-threatening injury • Airway, Breathing or Circulation Problem • Unconscious • Examples: • Unresponsive, altered level of consciousness, severe breathing difficulty, uncontrollable bleeding, amputations above elbow or knee, blue skin color, rapid or weak pulse, open abdominal wounds, etc. NACCHO 02-2006

  32. “M.A.S.S.” Triage “SORT” – DELAYED: • Need definitive medical care, but should not worsen rapidly, if initial care is delayed • Examples: • Deep cuts or open fractures with controlled bleeding and strong pulses, finger amputations, abdominal injuries with stable vital signs, closed head injuries without altered LOC, etc. NACCHO 02-2006

  33. “M.A.S.S.” Triage “SORT” – MINIMAL: • “Walking wounded” • Group, sort & facilitate transport from scene • Volunteer help? Risk vs. Benefit • Examples: • Scrapes, bruises, minor cuts, no apparent injuries NACCHO 02-2006

  34. “M.A.S.S.” Triage “SORT” – : • Most severely injured with little chance of survival • They are “expected” to die soon • In a perfect world, they would receive the most care, even though chance of survival is low • In an MCI.... EXPECTANT NACCHO 02-2006

  35. “M.A.S.S.” Triage “SORT” – : • Care resources NOT utilized initially • Comfort care as available • Death could be hours or days away! • Reassessment & transport • Transport those still alive after all IMMEDIATE victims evacuated • Resuscitate & treat as resources allow EXPECTANT NACCHO 02-2006

  36. “M.A.S.S.” Triage “SORT” – : • Examples: • Near 100 % burns • Fatal radiation doses • Absent pulse or breathing • Especially if multiple injuries • Severe open brain injury • Death “imminent” • “Judgment call” EXPECTANT NACCHO 02-2006

  37. Triage Caveats • OVER-TRIAGE: • Tendency to classify all victims as IMMEDIATE • Defeats the purpose! • Ruptured eardrums, chronic hearing loss, language barrier, developmental handicaps, etc. • Cannot respond to “MASS” commands NACCHO 02-2006

  38. Other Triage Caveats • UNDER-TRIAGE: • Initial grouping ≠ individual assessment • Worsening patient conditions: • Internal or external bleeding, shock • Closed head injury • Blast injury to lung, gut, brain • Airway swelling • Delayed chemical exposure symptom onset • Etc. NACCHO 02-2006

  39. “M.A.S.S.” Triage • “SORT” process isdynamic: • Resources change • Patient conditions change • Frequent reassessment • All categories • may become IMMEDIATE • “Most serious” injury present demands “immediate” attention! EXPECTANT NACCHO 02-2006

  40. Triage Tags • Tag immediately after sorting • Tie triage tag directlyto patient • May need to improvise tags (tape, exam gloves, cloth) • May need to write on patient (lipstick, marker) NACCHO 02-2006

  41. Wrapping up the SORT... • When all patients have been triaged and tagged: • Count all IMMEDIATES • Advise incident commander or transport officer of number • Take all IMMEDIATES to collection point for urgent transport NACCHO 02-2006

  42. “M.A.S.S.” Triage “SEND”: • Objective: • Transport or release ALL livingpatients ASAP • Traditional sequence: • IMMEDIATE • DELAYED • MINIMAL EXPECTANT NACCHO 02-2006

  43. “M.A.S.S.” Triage “SEND”: • Be mission-focused: • Send MINIMALSor DELAYEDS with each IMMEDIATE, if space allows • Be resourceful: • Secondary treatment facilities for MINIMALS • Be creative: • Buses, taxis, trains, boats, etc. NACCHO 02-2006

  44. What About The DEAD? • Should NOTbe moved or sent • 1 EXCEPTION? • Medical examiner / coroner: • Identification of remains • Disposition of remains • Crime scene investigation: • Evidence must be preserved • Apprehend perpetrators and prevent future attacks NACCHO 02-2006

  45. The Need To Drill • Regardless of which triage system your agency favors... • ...Practice, practice, practice! • “TRIAGE TAG TUESDAY” • Preparation will promote more efficient triage in an actual MCI NACCHO 02-2006

  46. When All Is Said and Done... • MCI Triage is NOT “business as usual” • Difficult decisions must be made • Fatalities and suffering are likely • “Gut check” for healthcare providers • “Non-medical” people can participate NACCHO 02-2006

  47. Summary: Now you can • Define “Triage” • Identify goals of MCI triage • Implement “MASS” Triage • Classify MCI victims by “ID-me” categories NACCHO 02-2006

  48. Thank You!Questions? NACCHO 02-2006

More Related