1 / 34

The Strategic Action Programme for The Sustainable Management of Lake Tanganyika

The Strategic Action Programme for The Sustainable Management of Lake Tanganyika. By Nick HODGSON Facilitator, SAP. Ultimate Objective “…control pollution and to prevent the loss of the exceptional diversity of Lake Tanganyika’s International Waters.” Immediate Objective 1

villette
Download Presentation

The Strategic Action Programme for The Sustainable Management of Lake Tanganyika

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Strategic Action Programmefor The Sustainable Management ofLake Tanganyika By Nick HODGSON Facilitator, SAP

  2. Ultimate Objective “…control pollution and to prevent the loss of the exceptional diversity of Lake Tanganyika’s International Waters.” Immediate Objective 1 “…establish a regional long-term management plan for pollution control, conservation and maintenance of biodiversity in Lake Tanganyika.” Project Objectives

  3. The Concept What is a SAP The Consultation How the SAP was developed The Conclusions What are the priority actions addressed in the SAP The Strategic Action ProgrammeThe SAP

  4. The Concept

  5. Management of the lake is a continuing activity. Research, monitoring and evaluation are continuing activities supporting management. Management Plans need to be revised in response to changes in threats and opportunities, and information. The Strategic Action Programme defines an agreed framework within which management programmes are developed and revised, and the steps needed to achieve this framework. From a Management Plan toa Strategic Action Programme

  6. Management of the Lake Resources... DraftSAP AgreedSAP RevisedSAP RevisedSAP PrioritisedManagementInterventionsFunded+Monitoring &Evaluation + Further Research RevisedManagementInterventionsFunded+Monitoring &Evaluation + Further Research Strategic Action Programmes Evolve

  7. The GEF ApproachThe Corner Stones of the SAP Transboundary Diagnostic Analysiscarried out by participating countries, identifying priority concerns threatening shared lake resources. Strategic Action Programmeprepared by participating countries, committing them to the prioritised programme of actions Regional Convention, signed by participating countries, formalising national obligations to support the SAP

  8. “The centerpiece of the GEF strategy... is the concept of “strategic joint fact finding” as a means of arriving at a consensus on what actions are needed to address threats... collaborating states establish technical teams that work to establish a common baseline of facts and analysis of the problem in the form of a transboundary diagnostic analysis (TDA), which is then used to set (national) priorities for actions to address threats to international waters in the form of the SAP.” The Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis Study of GEF’s Overall Performance ; GEF 1998

  9. The SAP should establish clear priorities that are endorsed at the highest levels of government and widely disseminated. Priority transboundary concerns should be identified, as well as sectoral interventions (policy changes, program development, regulatory reform, capacity-building investments, and so on) needed to resolve the transboundary problems as well as regional and national institutional mechanisms for implementing elements of the SAP.” Strategic Action Programme Operational Strategy of the GEF; GEF 1996

  10. “... a balanced programme of preventive and remedial actions, support both investment and capacity-building, and identify key activities in the following areas: Priority preventive and remedial actions Cross-cutting issues and linkages to other focal areas Institutional strengthening and capacity-building needs Stakeholder involvement and public awareness activities Program monitoring and evaluation Institutional mechanisms for implementation.” Strategic Action Programme

  11. A regional programme establishing: agreed principles and objectives for managing the shared resource of the Lake; an initial prioritisation of management interventions and institutional development. A tool to: direct national investments towards priorities; “leverage” finance from donor agencies for National and Regional Programmes. How the SAP Helps Management

  12. The Consultation Process

  13. January 1996, Baseline Reviews summarised available information March 1996, Inception Workshop identified priority concerns and proposes research priorities January 1998, Steering Committee endorsed a process of consultation for the SAP and the Convention led at national level by National Working Groups led at regional level by the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) SAP Planning Group. Initiating the Process of Consultation

  14. Seven Steps in Developing the SAP National Consultation Workshops - March to November 1998 Preliminary TDA Workshop - November 1998 SCM Endorses Preliminary TDA - May 1999 Draft SAP Workshop - January 2000 Final TDA Workshop - March 2000 Final SAP Workshop - May 2000 SCM adopt the Final SAP - July 2000

  15. SAP 1 National Consultation 2 Regional Problem Analysis and Prioritisation 3 Draft SAP incorporating concepts from Draft Convention 4 SAP Signed Convention 1 National Consultation 2 Draft Convention presented to Regional Meetings 3 Convention incorporates concepts from signed SAP 4 SC Endorses Convention 5 Diplomatic Negotiation Linking the SAP and the Convention

  16. Special studies implemented with 125 scientists from the four countries National TDA/SAP consultations involving 80 institutions and 160 individuals Regional TAC/SAP planning team involving 18 institutions and 30 individuals 16 National Meetings and 16 National Workshops 4 Regional Workshops and 3 SCM Discussions Consultation A E Mayawalla Tanzania; A Kabeleka Zambia; A Lugome Tanzania; A Madete Tanzania; A Mphande Zambia; A Muvwende Zambia; Agapit Kabwa Burundi; AJ Mkama Tanzania; Andrew Menz PCU; Antoine Kiyuku Burundi; B Lukama Zambia; B N Marwa Tanzania; Baluku Bajope DR Congo; Benoit Bihamiriza Burundi; Benoit Nzigidahera Burundi; Bitijula DR Congo; Boniface Nyakageni Burundi; Bungisabo DR Congo; C Akashambatwa Zambia; C Kabumbu Zambia; C Kangero Tanzania; C Makundi Tanzania; C Mung’ong’o Tanzania; C Phiri Zambia; C Rumisha Tanzania; C Swai Tanzania; Catherine Msigwa Tanzania; Cécile Gakima Burundi; Célestin Burundi; D B R Chitamwebwa Tanzania; D Mhalu Tanzania; Damien Nindorera Burundi; Denis Barandemaje Burundi; Didace Nimpagaritse Burundi; E Bwalya Zambia; E Lenganasa Tanzania; E Makwaia Tanzania; Eddie Allison Biodiversity SS; Elongo Buedi DR Congo; Elysée Ntiranyibagira Burundi; F Mukome Tanzania; F Nyirenda Zambia; F Stolla Tanzania; Faustin Masanja Tanzania; Francis Chale Tanzania; François Nkurunziza Burundi; G Chikwama Zambia; G Chilukusha Zambia; G Makinda Tanzania; G Mpango Tanzania; G Mudenda Zambia; G Muwowo Zambia; G Strunden Tanzania; Gabriel Hakizimana Burundi; Gaspard Niragira Burundi; Gaspard Ntakimazi Burundi; Gayo DR Congo; George Hanek FAO; George M Chitalu Zambia; Georgina Zulu Zambia; Gerard Cougny GEF; Gérard Ntungumburanye Burundi; Golama DR Congo; Gombo Eunda Matunga DR Congo; Graeme Patterson Sediment and Pollution SS; H M Mohamed Tanzania; H Mollel Tanzania; H N Kachechele Tanzania; Henry Sichingabula Zambia; Hidaya M M Faraji Tanzania; Hudson Nkotagu Tanzania; I Aboud Tanzania; Ignace Bandandaza Burundi; J Mwilwa Zambia; J Phiri Zambia; J Shilungushela Tanzania; J Uronu Tanzania; James Phiri Zambia; JB M S Gilbert Tanzania; Jean Berchmans Manirakiza Burundi; Jean Paul Ledant NRI; Jean-Marie Bukuru Burundi; Jerome Dukuduku Tanzania; Jerome Karimumuryango Burundi; John Dorr Fishing Practices, SS; K Mazingaliwa Zambia; K Mungule Zambia; K Siame Zambia; Kalambayi DR Congo; Karen Zwick SS Facilitators; Kayega Tanzania; Kelly West PCU; Kihurnwa Tanzania; Kinezero, Mathias Burundi; Kinomvyi, Antoine Burundi; Kirit Vaitha Tanzania; Kitungano DR Congo; Kumbu di Mbemba DR Congo; L Mawele Zambia; L Nzali Tanzania; L Rwebembera Tanzania; Leonard Mwape Zambia; Lukonge Tanzania; M M Shirima Tanzania; M Mbijima Tanzania; M Musaba Zambia; M Nagahusedi DR Congo; M Nsomi Zambia; M Pearce PCU; M Phiri Zambia; M T Looboki Tanzania; Mady Amule DR Congo; Mandgi DR Congo; Marcelin Burundi; ME Bashige DR Congo; ME Mbombo DR Congo; Mino-Kahozi Kalibu DR Congo; Misana Tanzania; Mohamed Bahari Tanzania; Msemi Tanzania; Mudherwa Nshombo CRH-Uvira; Mulimbwa CRH-Uvira; Mulimbwa Nsibula DR Congo; Mwenyi Kaningingi DR Congo; Nakizimana, Gabriel Burundi; Ndimbo Tanzania; Ndizeye, Pascal Burundi; Nicholas Hodgson NRIe; Niels Henrik Ipsen GEF; Nshombo Mudherwa DR Congo; O Kalumiana Zambia; O Lungu Zambia; Olivier Drieu SS Facilitator; P Banda Zambia; P Chipungu Zambia; P Chisara Tanzania; P Kimena Zambia; P Nnyiti Tanzania; Palata Kabudi DR Congo; Pierre Bakevya Burundi; R Chiti Zambia; R Sinyinza Zambia; Rawson Yonazi Tanzania; Richard Paley SS Facilitators; Robert Lindley SS Facilitators; Roger Kanyaru Burundi; S Capper Tanzania; S Chisamga Zambia; S Kisinto Tanzania; S Mayeye Tanzania; S Nkondokaya Tanzania; S Siachoono Zambia; Salvator Ruzima Burundi; Shadreck Nsongela Zambia; Stanislas Nzabimana Burundi; Swedi DR Congo; T Killenga Tanzania; T Mwaijande Tanzania; Takoy Lomema DR Congo; Tharcisse Songore Burundi; Tindyembwa Tanzania; V Lyimo Tanzania; V Macha Tanzania; W Daniel Tanzania; W Malambo Zambia; W N Sarunday Tanzania; W Y Haule Tanzania; Z Kittina Tanzania; Z Mshanga Tanzania;

  17. National Consultation ReportsCompleted October 1998

  18. Preliminary TDA Endorsed May 1999

  19. Preliminary SAP Completed February 2000

  20. Final Draft TDACompleted May 2000

  21. Final Draft SAPPresented May 2000

  22. The ConclusionsA Programme of Priority Actions

  23. National Workshops identified national concerns and proposed national actions to counteract threats or maximise opportunities Regional Workshops - the TAC SAP Planning Team of planners and scientists - reviewed national concerns and regional concerns within a regional perspective Based on best available scientific and management knowledge - with specific support from the special studies The TDA Reviewed National and Regional Concerns

  24. The TDA provided a General Framework for Action

  25. The TDA Defined a Three Level Analytical Framework

  26. Prioritised on a combination of three criteria: The severity of the problem threatening biodiversity The feasibility of a management solution The benefits to sustainable development Gave a high, medium or low priority rating The TDA Listed and Prioritised Specific Groups of Actions

  27. For the high priority regional specific actions identified relevant national concerns Prepared a detailed matrix which: Identified stakeholders, uncertainties and detailed breakdown of proposed actions Reviewed possible timing of actions, key agency responsibility and availability of resources The TDA Proposed Priority National Actions within a Regional Priority Framework

  28. With immediate responsibilities: To promote the signing of convention and the establishment of functioning management bodies required in the convention To develop detailed budgeted proposals and source funding for priority regional actions within the SAP To coordinate and support national development of priority budgeted proposals and facilitate funding To maintain an information resource The SAP Defines an Interim Lake Tanganyika Management Body

  29. Identifying cross-cutting themes from within the proposed actions Information management; socio-economic development; institutional reform and capacity building; environmental education; baseline monitoring Defining national priority actions within the regional framework Development of a sustainable fisheries; pollution control; sediment management; habitat conservation The SAP Defines an Agreed Programme of Priority Actions Based on the TDA

  30. Excessive fishing effort in the littoral zone Excessive fishing pressure; lack of quota on licenses; co-management of fisheries Excessive fishing effort in the pelagic zone Linking to the LTR proposals “Regional Framework Planning for lake Tanganyika Fisheries Management”; including artisanal and industrial fishing Excessive or uncontrolled extraction of ornamental fish Excessive extraction of targeted species With Actions Addressing the Development of a Sustainable Fisheries

  31. Urban and Industrial pollution domestic effluents; untreated sewage; waste from institutions; solid waste treatment; factories; power stations; tanneries Harbour Pollution spillage of oil and other cargoes; waste from boats; storage Future mining and oil exploration toxic wastes; EIA procedures Marine accidents risk assessment and contingency planning With Actions Addressing Pollution Control

  32. Promotion of sustainable agriculture focused on critical lakeshore and medium scale catchments; erosion control; extensive agriculture; stream bank cultivation Deforestation gazetted protection forests; fuelwood and charcoal; replanting and rehabilitation of critical areas; community forest management With Actions Addressing Sediment Management

  33. Support of parks management existing parks areas cover much of the widespread species diversity; pressure on parks resources from adjacent communities; definition of aquatic boundaries Protection of key habitats degradation of sensitive coastal areas; protection of spawning and nursery grounds; wetlands areas With Actions Addressing Habitat Conservation

  34. Identification of support mechanisms for an interim period to: Promote the finalisation and subsequent signing of the Convention Finalise regional and national detailed, budgeted project proposals for the priority actions identified in the SAP Negotiate country commitment and incremental support to implement priority regional and national actions The Next Steps

More Related