250 likes | 538 Views
Consolidated Supervision: Managing the Risks in a Diversified Financial Services Industry Barbara Baldwin June 2001. Banking Groups. Two or more legal entities Linked through common ownership or control Providing financial services (e.g., banking, securities, insurance)
E N D
Consolidated Supervision: Managing the Risks in a Diversified Financial Services IndustryBarbara BaldwinJune 2001
Banking Groups • Two or more legal entities • Linked through common ownership or control • Providing financial services (e.g., banking, securities, insurance) • Including at least one bank • Cross-Sector and/or Cross-Border
Prudential Concerns • Contagion (within and between groups) • Intra-group transactions and exposures(e.g. cross shareholdings, inter-affiliate lending) • Loss of Confidence • Extension of official safety net to nonbank group affiliates may lead to moral hazard
Prudential Concerns • Transparency and Regulatory Arbitrage • Complex corporate structures: • Complicate a supervisor’s assessment of group risk exposure • May be used to circumvent regulatory requirements or to facilitate fraudulent activities • May be used to exploit differences in regulatory requirements across sectors and/or jurisdictions • Conflicts of Interest
Supervisory Implications • “Solo” approach of supervising individual group entities, absent contact with other financial sector supervisors, is no longer adequate • “Solo supervision” must be complemented with “consolidated supervision”
Consolidated Supervision • The Components: • Consolidation of Accounts • Consolidated Regulation (Quantitative) • Consolidated Supervision (Qualitative) • Based on qualitative and quantitative information about the group • Allows financial sector supervisors to: • Understand the relationships among the legal entities • Assess and monitor how effectively the group identifies, manages and controls risks • Recognize insipient problems
Consolidated Supervision • Objectives and Principles • Promotion of systemic financial soundness • Capture all members of the financial group in the supervisory program • Formally • Informally • Making consolidated supervision operational in practice
Consolidated Supervision • Preconditions for Effective CS • The legal framework • Independence of the supervisory agency • Degree of commitment to the process
Consolidated Accounting • What is it? • Why do it? • Which accounting standards apply? • What is the scope of consolidation?
Consolidated Accounting • Methods of Consolidation • Full line-by-line • Equity method • Proportional Consolidation • Relevant IAS • IAS 27: Subsidiaries • IAS 28: Associates • IAS 31: Joint Ventures • IAS 25: Investments • The impact of IAS 39: Financial Instruments
Quantitative Consolidated Supervision • Prudential Requirements • Capital Adequacy, Large Exposures,Connected Lending • Many potential risks cannot be quantified in financial ratios • Determination of how group relationships may impact any regulated entities
Quantitative Consolidated Supervision • Takes wider account of the risks posed by group entities, should they have a material impact on the reputation or financial soundness of a bank
Qualitative Consolidated Supervision • Focuses on: • Group-wide business plans and strategies • Consolidated internal controls and risk management • Management and organizational structure • Degree of operational, legal, strategic and reputational risks
Qualitative Consolidated Supervision • Requires: • Availability of significant information about the consolidated group on a routine basis • Frequent communications between supervisors and group management • Supervisors must understand how the group is managed in practice, not just on paper
Designing the CS program • Large groups will require continual supervision from a systemic risk perspective • An analyst or group of analysts should be appointed to oversee each financial group • An annual supervisory program should be designed for each group • Supervisory resources should be allocated based upon the relative risk profiles
Supervisory Cooperation and Coordination • Basic principles for cross-border supervision: • No foreign establishment should escape supervision • Supervision should be adequate
Minimum Standards • All international banking groups should be supervised by a home country authority that capably performs consolidated supervision • The creation of a cross-border establishment should receive the prior consent of both host and home country supervisors
Minimum Standards • The home country supervisor should possess the right to gather information from the cross-border establishments of the banking groups they supervise • If these minimum standards are not met, the host country could impose restrictive measures necessary to satisfy its prudential concerns (including denial of an application)
Cooperation Between Home and Host Supervisors • Allows them to discharge their supervisory responsibilities • Ensures that the supervisory strategy for the group is comprehensive • Facilitates detection and deterrence of cross-border misconduct
Authorization Stage • Considerations for Host Supervisor • assess the home supervisor’s ability to “capably” perform CS • If CS is inadequate, or the parent is not a regulated entity in the home country: • Insist that certain conditions be fulfilled, or • Refuse the application • Considerations for Home Supervisor • Assess the host’s supervisory standards • If inadequate, or impediments to information transfer exist: • Insist that certain conditions be fulfilled, or • Refuse consent for the banking group to establish foreign operations
Authorization StageEstablishing a Strategy for Ongoing Supervision • Home and host supervisors become familiar with each other’s objectives and approaches • Allocation of responsibilities for supervision of foreign establishment agreed • Information needs established • Information sharing mechanisms agreed Formal information sharing mechanisms do not ensure, and should not be viewed as a prerequisite for, supervisory cooperation
Supervisory Cooperation • Establishing Effective Supervisory Cooperation • The freedom to exchange prudential information is a prerequisite for effective supervisory cooperation • National bank secrecy legislation is a major impediment for effective cross-border supervision • National bank secrecy laws should be modified to ensure adequate supervisory information sharing
Supervisory Cooperation • Safeguards for Information Exchange • Recipient should use the information only for supervisory purposes • Recipient should ensure confidentiality of information received • Provider should not limit recipient’s use of information in carrying out supervisory duties
Conclusions • Diversified financial groups are becoming the dominant institutional structure in the financial services industry • Effective consolidated supervision is integral to the maintenance of systemic financial stability
Conclusions • Making it work will require an unprecedented level of supervisory cooperation • Supervisory agencies will encounter a number of policy and practical issues in developing an effective framework for consolidated supervision