170 likes | 293 Views
Investigating Gender Differences in HEDIS Measures Related to Heart Disease. Ann F. Chou, PhD, MPH Carol S. Weisman, PhD Rosaly Correa-de-Araujo, MD, PhD Sarah H. Scholle, DrPH, MPH. Background.
E N D
Investigating Gender Differences in HEDIS Measures Related to Heart Disease Ann F. Chou, PhD, MPH Carol S. Weisman, PhD Rosaly Correa-de-Araujo, MD, PhD Sarah H. Scholle, DrPH, MPH
Background • Substantial literature documents gender disparities in guideline-indicated preventive and treatment services related to cardiovascular disease (CVD). • Women may need more aggressive risk factor management than men due to differences in risk factors and symptom presentation.
CVD in Managed Care Population • A significant portion of the US population receives care through managed care organizations, where the quality of care may be more uniform. • Few studies that examined gender disparities in CVD-related care among managed care enrollees.
Study Objectives • To assess the reportability of CVD measures by gender (under existing specifications) • To determine whether gender disparities in performance were evident within health plans
CVD-related HEDIS Measures • Beta blocker treatment post acute myocardial infarction (AMI) • Persistence of beta blocker treatment post AMI • Controlling high blood pressure • Comprehensive diabetes care: • Cholesterol screening • LDL control <100 mg/dL • Cholesterol management after acute cardiovascular event: • Cholesterol screening • LDL control <100 mg/dL
NCQA Sample Recruitment • 289 Plans, varied by measure, that submit 2005 HEDIS performance data to NCQA were invited to participate in feasibility test. • The final sample included 46 commercial health Plans, representing a national sample.
Plans in Study Profit status For profit: 33 (73.3%) Not for profit: 12 (26.7%) Model type Group: 2 (4.4%) IPA/Network: 25 (54.4%) Mixed Model: 19 (41.3%) Size* <95,000 members: 16 (34.8%) 95,000+: 30 (65.2%) All Others Reporting HEDIS Profit status For profit: 169 (72.2%) Not for profit: 65 (27.8%) Model type Group: 10 (4.1%) IPA/Network: 114 (46.9%) Mixed Model: 119 (49.0%) Size <95,000 members: 141 (58.0%) 95,000+: 102 (42.0%) Participating Plan Characteristics
Comparing Performance of Plans in Study v. All Other HEDIS-reporting Plans
Descriptive statistics Calculation of disparities score (male-female difference) T- and chi-square tests to determine significance of the gender difference Methods
Conclusion • Reporting of CVD measures based on gender is feasible for most measures. • Differences in plan performance by gender were noted for 3 of the 7 CVD measures.
Discussion • The CVD measures demonstrated a large range in disparity score among plans. LDL control for those with a history of CVD ranged from 3.4 in favor of women to 31.8 in favor of men in commercial plans. • Denominator size limited adequate assessment for several CVD measures.
Implications • Consumers/patients • Providers • Health plans
Acknowledgements • The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the American Heart Association provided funding support for this research. • NCQA staff provided data management and administrative support.