1 / 32

Immigration Goes Nationwide Recent immigrant dispersal has created national policy interest

Immigration Goes Nationwide Recent immigrant dispersal has created national policy interest. William H. Frey The University of Michigan and the Brookings Institution Briefing,”Immigration Policy: Federal Debates and Local Realities”, US Capitol Building, March 24, 2006.

vine
Download Presentation

Immigration Goes Nationwide Recent immigrant dispersal has created national policy interest

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Immigration Goes NationwideRecent immigrant dispersal has created national policy interest William H. Frey The University of Michigan and the Brookings Institution Briefing,”Immigration Policy: Federal Debates and Local Realities”, US Capitol Building, March 24, 2006

  2. Immigrants in the US, 1900 - 2005 in millions Source: US Census sources

  3. Immigrant Share of US Population Source: US Census sources

  4. Big Six States: Share of Immigrant Gains 1990-2000 2000-2005 Source: William H. Frey

  5. Immigration Spreads Beyond Traditional Magnet States 35.1 m 19.7 m Source: William H. Frey

  6. Fast Growing "New Immigrant" Destinations 1990-2005 Source: William H.Frey

  7. 200% or more growth Btn 100% and 199% growth Traditional immigrant gateway All other states State Immigrant Growth, 1990-2005 Source: William H. Frey

  8. States with at least 5% Immigrants Source: William H. Frey

  9. 15% or more 10-14% 5-9% Less than 5% Immigrant Concentrations in States 1990 2005 Source: William H. Frey

  10. States with Most Undocumented Immigrants ? ? Source: Jeffery Passel, Pew Hispanic Center

  11. Hispanics and AsiansRecent Immigrants vs Native Born 2005 Native Born Recent Immigrants Source: William H. Frey

  12. Hispanic and Asian Adults by Generation Asians Hispanics Source: William H. Frey

  13. Growth Rates , 2000-2010 Source: William H. Frey

  14. At Least 5% Hispanic Source: William H. Frey

  15. Source: William H. Frey

  16. STATES: Fastest Hispanic Growth 2000-04 • %Growth • 1. Arkansas 37.7 • 2. South Dakota 37.3 • 3. South Carolina 35.7 • 4. Georgia 35.7 • 5. North Carolina 35.0 • 6. Tennessee 33.4 • 7. Nevada 32.7 • 8. New Hampshire 32.7 • 9. Maine 32.0 Source: William H. Frey

  17. Metros: Fastest Hispanic Growth, 2000-04 • 1. Cape Coral-Ft Myers, FL 55.4 • 2. Charlotte 49.8 • 3. Raleigh 46.7 • 4. Nashville 44.9 • 5. Indianapolis 44.3 • 6. Atlanta 41.0 • 7. Naples, FL 38.7 • 8. Lakeland, FL 38.3 • 9. Sarasota, FL 38.0 • 10. Las Vegas 35.1 Source: William H. Frey

  18. States: Fastest Asian growth, 2000-04 • 1. Nevada 35.2 • 2. New Hampshire 32.5 • 3. Delaware 27.4 • 4. Georgia 26.8 • 5. Florida 24.4 • 6. Connecticut 24.4 • 7. North Carolina 24.2 • 8. Arizona 24.2 • 9. Arkansas 23.0 • 10. New Jersey 21.7 Source: William H. Frey

  19. Metros: Fastest Asian Growth, 2000-04 • 1. Las Vegas 38.5 • 2. Riverside 31.1 • 3. Orlando 30.2 • 4. Atlanta 28.5 • 5. Stockton, CA 28.4 • 6. Tampa-St.Pete 28.4 • 7. Austin 28.2 • 8. Phoenix 27.0 • 9. Sacramento 25.6 • 10. Dallas 24.8 Source: William H. Frey

  20. Suburban Co. Growth, 2000-04Hispanic and Asian Contributions 15% 20% 27% 37% 34% Source: William H. Frey

  21. Metro Growth, 2000-04Hispanic and Asian Contributions 53% 54% 56% 68% 72% Source: William H. Frey

  22. Central County Changes, 2000-04Race-Ethnic Contributions Source: William H. Frey

  23. Shares versus Growth Source: William H. Frey

  24. Year of Immigrant Arrival: Traditional Magnets versus New Destinations* 20% 31% *Traditional Magnets are California, New York, Florida, Texas, Illinois and New Jersey. New Destinations are North Carolina, Tennessee, Georgia, Nevada, Arizona, Iowa, Nebraska, and Colorado. Source: William H. Frey

  25. Hispanic and Asian Shares by Age Group California Georgia 3% 27% 6% 37% 12% 54% 12% 57% Source: William H. Frey

  26. Immigrants vs Natives: 2005 Source: William H. Frey

  27. Where Undocumented Dominate Foreign Born GT 40% Other Source: Jeffery Passel, Pew Hispanic Center

  28. Desired US Immigration Levels Source: William H. Frey analysis of CBS News Poll, July 29-Aug 2, 2005

  29. 3 Year Work Permits for Illegal Immigrants? Source: William H. Frey analysis of CBS News Poll, July 29-Aug 2, 2005

  30. Hispanics: 2004 Total vs Voter Shares Source: William H.Frey

  31. Useful Websites www.CensusScope.orgwww.frey-demographer.org Source: William H. Frey

More Related