180 likes | 336 Views
IEEE 802.11-IETF Liaison Report. Authors:. Date: 2012-11-11. Abstract. This presentation contains the IEEE 802.11 – IETF liaison report for November 2012. Follow-up from IETF- IEEE 802 Liaison Activity. Joint IETF/IEEE 802 Meeting held 25 July 2012
E N D
IEEE 802.11-IETF Liaison Report Authors: Date:2012-11-11 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks
Abstract This presentation contains the IEEE 802.11 – IETF liaison report for November 2012. Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks
Follow-up from IETF- IEEE 802 Liaison Activity • Joint IETF/IEEE 802 Meeting held 25 July 2012 • Agenda is here: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IEEE802andIETFleaders • Jon Rosdahl (head of delegation), Dorothy Stanley, Dave Halasz, Mark Hamilton, Gabor Bajko, Andrew Myles, Donald Eastlake • Notes and meeting materials available here: http://www.ietf.org/iesg/ieee/ • Teleconference meeting held 5 Sept 2012 • Notes, including action items • Teleconference held 29 Oct 2012 • Notes, including action items • IEEE 802.11 items • RFC4441bis update, see http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-dawkins-iab-rfc4441rev-00.txt (posted) and revision (see inserted object file) in progress,comments welcome Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks
About RFC 4441 & IETF liaisons • Reference document: RFC 4441 • 2006 document, but still relevant: “The IEEE 802/IETF Relationship”, see http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4441 • Liaison info: http://www.ietf.org/liaison/managers.html. IETF has a liaison manager FROM IETF to IEEE SA and IEEE 802.1, not to 802.11. • The IETF has a limited number of liaison relationships with other organizations. Liaisons are appointed by the IAB when the IAB feels that conditions warrant appointing a specific person to such a task. Note that such appointments are rare as the best way for organizations to work with the IETF is to do so within the working groups • Liaison statements are here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/ Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks
RADEXT WG • See http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/radext/ • RADIUS Extensions • The RADIUS Extensions Working Group will focus on extensions to theRADIUS protocol required to define extensions to the standardattribute space as well as to address cryptographic algorithmagility and use over new transports. • In addition, RADEXT will work on RADIUS Design Guidelines and define new attributes forparticular applications of authentication, authorization andaccounting such as NAS management and local area network (LAN) usage. • Updates [November 2012] • Of interest: RADIUS Attributes for IEEE 802 Networks, see http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext/ • Discuss this draft in San Antonio ARC session, Wednesday Nov 14 - PM2 to determine ifany comments should be sent by the IEEE 802.11 WG Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks
Diffie-Hellman Group Repository Liaison Request • Liaison request from July 2012 meeting • See https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/12/11-12-0977-00-0000-liaison-to-ietf-group-repository.doc • Liaison was discussed at IETF July Vancouver meeting, at Security Area Directorate • Agreed way forward • Registry update by IANA is “RFC required” • RFC being written to define requested updates • IKE Group Registry update RFC – Draft available: • https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-harkins-brainpool-ike-groups/ • Expect document approval early 2013 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks
Protocol to Access White Space database (paws) WG • paws Working Group was formed June 2011, see http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/paws/ • Charter and problem statement documents: • Charter, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/paws/charter/ • Problem Statement, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-patil-paws-problem-stmt/ • Goals and Milestones • Aug 2012 - Submit 'Use Cases and Requirements for Accessing a Radio White Space Database' to the IESG for publication as Informational • April 2013 - Submit 'Accessing a Radio White Space Database' to the IESG for publication as Proposed Standard • Updates [Nov 2012] • Updated Use Cases and requirements, see http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts/ • Updated drafts: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-das-paws-protocol/ and http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-probasco-paws-discovery/ • Framework document, see http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wei-paws-framework/ • Security Considerations, see http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wu-paws-secutity/ Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks
Handover Keying (HOKEY) • Hokey Charter available at http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/hokey-charter.html • Extensions to current EAP key framework to facilitate inter-authenticator handover and roaming. • Published RFCs: • Handover Key Management and Re-authentication Problem Statement, see http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5169.txt • Specification for the Derivation of Root Keys from an Extended Master Session Key (EMSK), see http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5295.txt • EAP Extensions for EAP Re-authentication Protocol (ERP), see http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5296.txt • Distribution of EAP based keys for handover and re-authentication , see http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5749.txt[published March 2010] • Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Early Authentication Problem Statement, see http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5836 [published April 2010] • Updates [Nov 2012] • WG closed Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks
EAP Method Update (EMU) • Working Group website: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/emu-charter.html • RFC Documents - published • The EAP-TLS Authentication Protocol - http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc5216/ • Extensible Authentication Protocol - Generalized Pre-Shared Key (EAP-GPSK) Method- http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc5433/ • Channel-Binding Support for Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Methods http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6677/ • Requirements for a Tunnel-Based Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Method - http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6678/ • Updates [Nov 2012]: • Tunnel EAP Method (TEAP) Version 1 - http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-emu-eap-tunnel-method/ - Going to Working Group Last Call (analogous to Working Group Letter Ballot) Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks
IETF Geographic Location and Privacy (Geopriv) WG • See http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/geopriv-charter.html • Specific reference to WLANs: • Carrying Location Objects in RADIUS, see http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/66/IDs/draft-ietf-geopriv-radius-lo-08.txt • Documents referenced in 802.11 (TGv) • Geopriv Requirements, see http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3693.txt • Civic Address definitions, see http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4776.txt • July 2009 Liaison to IETF GEOPRIV • See https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/09/11-09-0718-01-000v-liaison-request-to-ietf-geopriv.doc • Updates [Nov 2012] • Relative Location, see http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-geopriv-relative-location/ draft to be submitted for publication • Agreed to have Working Group Last call on http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-geopriv-flow-identity/ • RFC 6753 published: A Location Dereference Protocol Using HTTP-Enabled Location Delivery (HELD), see http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6753/ • The geopriv group is finishing up the last few documents, and then will close – expect March 2013 as last (or no) meeting Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks
Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies (ECRIT) • Working Group website: http://www.ietf.org/dyn/wg/charter/ecrit-charter.html • Emergency Services • Framework for Emergency Calling using Internet Multimedia, see http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6443/ • Describing boundaries for Civic Addresses, see http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-ecrit-civic-boundary-02.txt • Updates [Nov 2012] • RFC 6739 published: Synchronizing Location-to-Service Translation (LoST) Protocol based Service Boundaries and Mapping Elements, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6739/ • Updated: Additional data related to an emergency call, see http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data/ • Updated: Out of Jurisdiction Emergency Routing, see http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-winterbottom-ecrit-priv-loc/ • Of interest: Extensions to the Emergency Services Architecture for dealing with Unauthenticated and Unauthorized Devices, see http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ecrit-unauthenticated-access/ Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks
Home Networking (homenet) WG • See https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/homenet/ • This working group focuses on the evolving networking technology within and among relatively small "residential home" networks • The task of the group is to produce an architecture document that outlines how to construct home networks involving multiple routers and subnets. • This document is expected to apply the IPv6 addressing architecture, prefix delegation, global and ULA addresses, source address selection rules and other existing components of the IPv6 architecture, as appropriate. • Updates [Nov 2012] • Updated: Home networking Architecture for IPv6, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-homenet-arch/ • New: IPv6 Home Network Front End Naming Delegation, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mglt-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation/ • New: Secret Gardens are Better than Walled Gardens, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-richardson-homenet-secret-gardens/ • New: BRDP for homenet, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-richardson-homenet-secret-gardens/ • New: Bootstrapping trust on a Homenet, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-behringer-homenet-trust-bootstrap/ • Updated: Grazed and Lightweight Open Protocol, see http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ruminski-homenet-galop-proto/ • Of Interest: Extended Multicast DNS: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lynn-homenet-site-mdns/ Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks
Dynamic Host Configuration (dhc) WG • See http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dhc/ • The DHC WG is responsible for reviewing DHCP options or other extensions (for both IPv4 and IPv6). • The DHC WG is expected to review all proposed extensions to DHCP to ensure that they are consistent with the DHCP specification and other option formats, that they do not duplicate existing mechanisms, etc. • Generally speaking, the DHC WG will not be responsible for evaluating the semantic content of proposed options. Similarly, the ownership of specifications typically belongs the relevant working group that needs more functionality from DHCP, not the DHC WG. The DHC WG coordinates reviews of the proposed options together with those working groups. It is required that those working groups have consensus to take on the work and that the work is within their charter. Exceptionally, with AD agreement, this same process can also be used for Individual Submissions originating outside WGs. • Updates [Nov 2012] • Of interest: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cao-dhc-anqp-option-01 also http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cao-dhc-anqp-option/history/ Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks
6LOWPAN Working Group • Working Group website: http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/6lowpan/charter/ • Focus: IPv6 over Low Power PAN: Adaption of IPv6 protocol to operate on constrained nodes and link layers • RFC 4944: adaption of IPv6 to 802.15.4 link layer • Improved header compression scheme, see http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc/ • RFC 6282, “Compression Format for IPv6 Datagrams over IEEE 802.15.4-Based Networks” published, see http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6282/ • Design and Application Spaces (Use Cases), see http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lowpan-usecases/ • RFC 6066 “Problem Statement and Requirements for IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Network (6LoWPAN) Routing” see http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6606/ • Updates [Nov 2012] • Published: “Neighbor Discovery Optimization for IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Networks (6LoWPANs)”, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6775/ • Submitted for publication: Transmission of IPv6 packets over Bluetooth Low Energy, see http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle/ • Updated: 6LoWPAN Roadmap and Implementation Guide http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bormann-6lowpan-roadmap/ • Updated: Definition of Managed Objects for IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Networks (6LoWPANs), see https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schoenw-6lowpan-mib/ Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks
ROLL Working Group • Working Group website: http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/ • Focus: Routing over Low Power and Lossy Networks • Routing Objectives, see http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6552/ • Routing protocol for efficient operation in low-power, lossy networks, see http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6550/ • Updates [Nov 2012] • Published: RFC 6719, “The Minimum Rank with Hysteresis Objective Function“, see http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6719/ • New: A Security Threat Analysis for Routing over Low Power and Lossy Networks, see http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-security-threats/ • Updated: A Mechanism to Measure the Quality of a Point-to-point Route in a Low Power and Lossy Network, see http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-p2p-measurement/ • Updated: Multicast Protocol for Low power and Lossy Networks (MPL), see http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-security-threats/ • Updated: Reactive Discovery of Point-to-Point Routes in Low Power and Lossy Networks, see http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl/ • Updated: Recommendations for Efficient Implementation of RPL: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gnawali-roll-rpl-recommendations/ • New: Use of the IPv6 Flow Label within an LLN , see http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thubert-roll-flow-label/ • Updated: Lightweight Key Establishment and Management Protocol in Dynamic Sensor Networks (KEMP), see http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-qiu-roll-kemp/ Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks
CORE Working Group • CORE (Constrained RESTful Environments) Working Group website: http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/core/ • Focus: framework for resource-oriented applications intended to run on constrained IP networks. • Constrained networks can occur as part of home and building automation, energy management, and the Internet of Things. • RFC 6690, Constrained RESTful Environments (CoRE) Link Format, see http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6690/ • Updates [Nov 2012] • Updated: Constrained Application Protocol, see http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-coap/ • Updated: Group Communication for CoAP:, see http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-groupcomm/ • Updated: Blockwise transfers in CoAP, see http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-block/ • Of interest: Security Bootstrapping of Resource-Constrained Devices, see http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sarikaya-core-sbootstrapping/ Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks
IETF Meetings • Meetings: • March 10-15, 2013 – Orlando • July 28 – August 2, 2013 – Berlin • November 3-8, 2013 – Vancouver • March 2-5, 2014 – London • July 20-25, 2014 – Toronto • November 9-14, 2014 - Honolulu • http://www.ietf.org Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks
References • RFC 4017 - IEEE 802.11 Requirements on EAP Methods • Jan 2012 report (PAWS, Homenet details), https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/12/11-12-0122-01-0000-january-2012-liaison-to-ietf.ppt Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks